Medical Malpractice And Tort Reform

Improved Essays
Medical Malpractice and Tort Reform Medical Malpractice is becoming a major issue for healthcare providers. Certainly, there are legitimate concerns on each side of side of the debate. The cost of malpractice insurance and the threat of being sued influences doctors. This could be a reason why more and more doctors are becoming more cautious and performing tests and procedures that may not be necessary in the patients diagnose. But because of the fear of being sued they are being extra cautious and protecting themselves. Over the course of this paper the writer will discuss and define what is Medical Malpractice and Tort Reform are as well as, answer the following questions. What must the plaintiff prove to prevail in a claim of medical malpractice? …show more content…
Elements of Medical Malpractice Medical Malpractice being “Improper, unskilled or negligent treatment of a patient by a physician, dentist, nurse, pharmacist, or other health care professionals.” (legal dictionary, 2017) When a person has alleged medical malpractice must also prove the following four …show more content…
But, they are very different. Medical malpractice is a subcategory of negligence. Medical negligence is the lack of action by a healthcare provider, often without intent; negligence can be done with or without intent; and medical malpractice is done with the intent to harm. It’s important to understand the difference’s since, “In 2013, an article in the Journal of Patient Safety estimated that between 210,000 to 400,00 people die in every year in the U.S. from hospital medical errors.” (January 2014, PBS) The writer has personal experience when it comes to standard negligence. The writer was involved in a car accident, the accident was due to negligence on the part of the other driver. The weather conditions were snowy and slick roads. While the traffic was slow the other driver was distracted by the texting on her phone and ultimately rear ended the writer. Due to the negligence of the driver she was charged with careless driving. Because of this careless driving, it resulted in medical injuries to the writer. Whereas an example of the medical malpractice would be failure of proper diagnostics, failure to properly warn patients of potential risks of treatment that have serious risk factors or if the health care provider gives a wrongful

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Dorrough V. Wilkes (2002)

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages

    NUR 714 Legal Case Study Analysis Paper Dorrough v. Wilkes (2002) No 2001-CA-00117-SCT Jonathan R. Heshler California University of Pennsylvania NUR 714 Legal Case Study Analysis The purpose of this paper is to analyze and review the case of Dorrough v. Wilkes (2002). This civil case involved a female patient (Gwendolyn Wilkes) presenting to the emergency room at Boliver County Hospital, being misdiagnosed and discharged by Dr. Dorrough, dying the next day at another hospital after emergency surgery and the patients husband and son bringing a wrongful death medical malpractice action suit forth.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The failure to report child abuse is both illegal and unethical, and can lead to legal accountability for further injuries the child endures after going back to the harsh and dangerous environment. Malpractice is a form of negligence. Malpractice issues include professional wrongdoing, unethical behavior, irrational lack of skill or reliability in professional duties, or evil practice. The four categories of malpractice include: criminal malpractice which involves assault and battery or euthanasia, civil malpractice that involves carelessness, or perform below a practical standard, Ethical malpractice which involves abuse of professional ethics and breach of contract where the medical assistant is duty-bound to act only in the patient’s welfare, protect their life, and defend…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Oliver Vs Brock Case Study

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A civil suit is commonly derived from a private party or individual, who alleges damages from duty of care. Once a civil case begins, it is the duty of the plaintiff to prove, with evidence, duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and damages. Conversely, the defendant must prove their affirmative defense against documented allegations. The Oliver versus Brock case proves the importance of supporting evidence as opposed to hearsay statements, to prove the truth of the matter. In the Oliver versus Brock case, Cathy (Plaintiff) filed a lawsuit against Bryan Whitfield Memorial Hospital of Demopolis and the treating physicians Dr. F.S. Whitfield, Dr. Paul Ketcham and Dr. E.C. Brock (Defendant) for negligence of care.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Orr V. Bell Case Summary

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Exceptional care and professional responsibility is a standard form of practice the general public rely upon for their health care needs. But, what happens when codes of conduct, rules and codes of ethics are violated and physicians fail to provide adequate care and diagnostics? When circumstance like this arise, who becomes responsible for the negligence on behalf of the patient? In the case of Orr vs. Bell, due to the negligence on behalf of Dr. Bell, the patient Orr went misdiagnosed and eventually became paralyzed. The review of this case will document and prove due to Dr. Bell’s failure to follow nationally recognized Radiologic ethics and rules Dr. Bell failed to determine Orr’s medical issue and therefore was responsible for the outcome…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sometimes malpractice lawsuits are well warranted, however, sometimes they do not have legal merit. The conclusion of the article best summarizes the author’s advice to physicians faced with frivolous malpractice lawsuits when he states, “Doctors should hold the legal profession accountable when attorneys overstep. Give them a taste of their own medicine, and ask for damages. The number of frivolous cases has declined significantly since various tort reform measures have been enacted. If physicians are lucky, outrageous cases will be dismissed before too much expense is incurred.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There may be further time limits to learn about, and new obligations can be forced by the law in the upcoming time. As a consequence, because of such time limits on when a claimant may bring a court proceeding, it is of great importance to speak to a health care misconduct attorney whenever possible later than your injury takes place. Compensation…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Inouye alleges medical malpractice against Dr. Black. In order for malpractice to be warranted, there must be clear violation of duty, deviation from the standard of care, direct causation and damages. The plaintiff argued that Dr. Black violated his duty and deviated from the standard of care which was the direct cause of the resulting damages of the surgery. Identification of Ethical Issue…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pbins 401 Assignment

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The term negligence would apply in a situation where someone did not use the level of care or skills that another would ordinarily have used in a similar situation (Phillips, 2013). Alternatively, malpractice is considered the “careless performance of duty” and requires that the expected delivery of a level of care equal to educational capability, a deviation from that training occurred and someone was directly harmed by the action or inaction which was incongruent with training received to perform the duty (Phillips, 2013, p. 39). Moral Principles in Decision Making A way to guide our ethical practice is essential.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niles Case Study

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The injuries sustained in the Niles v City of San Rafael were foreseeable. The injuries resulted from the commission and the omission of act from the defendants. There was negligence in the city’s supervision of the school playground and medical malpractice at Mt. Zion Hospital. The medical negligence was nonfeasance meaning there was a failure to act when there is a duty to act as a reasonability to safeguard a person rights. The Plaintiff was an innocent party whom rights were violated by the defendants.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Book Review: The Malpractice Myth by Tom Baker Summary: The Malpractice Myth by Tom Baker exposes the problem of high-cost healthcare services by insurance companies due to legal liability, profit incentives, and market competition. Stereotypically, the problem of medical malpractice is often blamed on patient litigation and tort law, which is proven false in Baker’s (2007) analysis. Baker (2007) defines the two factors of (1) increased medical malpractice (with decreased lawsuits) and (2) healthcare rate hikes in the healthcare industry as the primary culprit for high healthcare costs. Discussion: Tom Baker’s (2007) motive for writing this book is to debunk the myth of legal mitigation for medical malpractice as the primary reason for the failure of insurance companies to provide affordable and effective healthcare services.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Three Strikes Law

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lesson 4 Essay Medical Malpractice can be defined as the negligent or irresponsible medical treatment of a doctor, nurse or other medical practitioner that results in injury or death of a patient in their care (McMillen Law Firm, 2013). One of the unique qualities about Florida is its exercise of the ‘Three Strikes Law’. The relatively recent amendment to the Florida Constitution would automatically revoke the medical license of any doctor hit with three malpractice judgments which makes Florida one of the most hostile states for physicians. In my opinion, when it comes to protecting patients and physicians alike, there should be limitations set in place for each party.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tort claim cost so much money to the healthcare organizations. Healthcare organizations like hospitals are making less profit because of the money they have to spend to pay for those claims. In addition, they have to provide malpractice insurance to their physicians. Moreover, tort claim would harm a healthcare organization reputation. Consequently, claims will decrease the demand for medical care causing patients to go to a different hospital or practice to seek for better…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the unfortunate case of Canterbury versus Spence, had the patient believed he was properly informed about the procedure, there likely would not have been a suit. Not only do patients suffer when they are ill informed of the procedure they will undergo, but doctors face many consequences when the information provided is lacking or misunderstood. Doctors are constantly made to fear that the patient will seek legal retribution when outcomes are unexpected; the threat of a malpractice or negligence suit is constantly looming about. “Failure by a doctor to properly provide the…

    • 1882 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tort Reform

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A bill was passed in Texas in 2003 capping damages for pain and suffering from malpractice claims at $250,000. Another bill issued in California limit’s plaintiffs’ leverage by initiating a Malpractice and Injury Compensation Reform Act, which limits “pain and suffering” damages to $250,000 as well. Although private teaching hospitals are shielded from malpractice claims through “sovereign immunity” they capped their damages at $300,000 per incident in Florida. While granting these limits, the plaintiffs are still receiving a large amount of money. Additionally this helps lower income level families to not suffer in the process.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Long V Nursing Home

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages

    When Alcoy, was decided in 2006, it appears as though that case was the first instance where Virginia courts endeavored to make a nuanced distinction between medical malpractice and ordinary negligence committed by a medical provider. Prior to that case, in 1994, the Supreme Court of Virginia endeavored to interpret a provision of the Medical Malpractice Act that requires an expert to testify as to the relevant standard of care in a Medical Malpractice case without first determining whether the case was, in fact, a medical malpractice case. Beverly Enter.-Va. v. Nicholes, 441 S.E.2d 1, 1 (1994) (“The primary issue we consider in this medical malpractice action is . . . (emphasis added)).…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays