The issue in the case of Donald B. Farmer v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Farmer claims that since there was another man already charged and convicted of these crimes, the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States prohibits the Commonwealth from prosecuting Farmer under inconsistent theories regarding the identity of P.F.’s rapist and also, that the evidence was insufficient to sustain Farmer’s convictions. In 2011, Donald Farmer was convicted and sentenced a 125 year sentence for the rape of P.F, statutory burglary, robbery, and the murder of Eathel Fraenzel. In 1987, Farmer and his friend Williams both knocked on the door of Eathel and P.F and attempted to rob them and ended up murdering Eathel…
I thoroughly enjoyed reading the article, "Franchise Hostages: Fast Food, God, and Politics" by Robert W. Emerson and Jason R. Parnell. Prior to reading this article, I never thought about the possible negative effects that the freedom of speech has on a company. It made me realize that leaders of companies have to be cautious when speaking about politics. This highlights the fine line of free speech and politics. The examples given in this article show that when leaders of companies speak publicly about politics, there are likely negative consequences.…
As England began to take interest in the "New World", colonization by Englishmen began to spread drastically in the 1600's. English colonies took place on the eastern coast of the United States. Two early settlements established were in the New England and Chesapeake region. Although both were settled largely by people of English origin, by 1700 these two regions had evolved into two distinct societies, due mainly to reasons involving the reasons for settlement, geographical differences leading to different economics, religion and politics.…
The Union would have been at a disadvantage if Indian Territory (now Oklahoma) joined them. Texas to the south and west, Arkansas to the east were Confederate. Kansas to the north was part of the Union, but very few people settled there. It provided very little, if any, protection for the Indian tribes.…
There were three main colonial areas: The Northern Colonies, Middle Colonies, and the Southern Colonies; each one had different geography that caused separation between each identity. For example. The Northern, Middle, and Southern colonies, all because of their geography, were extremely different in terms of economy, food, and the way of life. The geography of the different colonies of British North America influenced the separation from them and Great Britain by 1730. Not only were the colonies separating of each other into individual identities, but as a whole emerging from Britain into their own while growing harsh feelings toward their mother country; there were many causes for the hatred at the mother country, but the main factor was…
Cahokia Mounds Thousands of years ago, known as the Mississippians today, begin to settle down. The built houses, burial mounds, ritual mounds and the center or all mound were called Cahokia. For their daily nutritional requirement, they used different resources. As earlier people, they grew squash, sunflower, wild berries and many other seed bearing plants, but the main fuel for their enterprise was agriculture.…
The book Cheap Meat by Deborah Gewertz and Frederick Errington is an analysis of culture in pacific islands, specifically Papua New Guinea. Flaps are a cut of meat from sheep that are especially fatty. This meat is undesirable to the white community and is often fed to their dogs. .For many within the lower socioeconomic status bracket, the only meat that is affordable is flaps.…
People should move to the Southern Colonies. The climate in the South is humid. In the summer months, the temperature ranges from 70 to 80 degrees fahrenheit. The winter months the temperature ranges from 40 to 50 degrees fahrenheit. The climate is good for farming, which is why farming is common in the Southern Colonies.…
Madeline Kirk U.S. History 1301 December 1, 2014 The Tariff of 1828 The Tariff of 1828, also known as the Tariff of Abominations, was the cause of major controversy in the United States. The increasingly powerful government required higher revenues and higher duties, which led to the Tariff of 1828 (Carnes and Garraty p. 193). This tariff was passed on May 19, 1828 with the goal of protecting industries in the north that were being hurt by low-priced imported goods (Tariff of 1828).…
Thus, this increase in food led to a major increase in population. Diamond then explains that this increase in population led to two phenomena: the increased spread of disease and sociocultural inequalities. With the establishment of agriculture, people became settled down permanently, and as human populations grew, people clumped together to form cities. All these people living in close quarters with one another, with often ill methods of disposing of human waste, promoted the spread of parasites and infectious disease within the population more easily. In addition, in settling down and forming communities built on agriculture, there came the need for someone to supervise the logistics of the community, such as overseeing irrigation construction, storing surplus crops, and distributing land to people.…
The exchange of crops was seen as a positive effect but, crops were not the only things that were…
To this day, America’s food culture remains to be its pride and joy, yet interestingly enough, what is understood by many to be the traditional food culture of America actually varies greatly from one part of the North American Continent to the other. However, of the vastly differentiating cultures found throughout America, one cannot deny that there is one region in particular who’s culinary culture is well defined, and easily recognizable. Actually, the entire region’s identity is nearly dependent on its distinct food culture; the American South. The south’s distinct and flavorful cuisine is admired throughout the nation and has become an important part of the average american’s diet. According to the HPBA, over 15,000,000 grills were sold…
Should the Government Have a Right to Regulate Food? Today in America, more and more people are becoming overweight and obese. Obesity is becoming a major problem in the United States. According to Melissa Abramotivs, the author of “Obesity” more than fifty million people in the United States weigh over one fifth of their body’s ideal weight (Abramotivs 2).…
Every year, thousands of Americans go to stores, buy the bad foods, and get into a bad health that they might not be able to fix on their own. Without help, they can continue to be at a health they don’t want to be. In order to set people up to get a good health, it is important to make healthier foods easier to get. A way to do this is to have a junk food tax. While some people may say this will work, others might be against it saying that what we need is to educate people on healthy food choices.…
In consideration of a junk food tax, investigation of potential impact on the individual is of particular significance. It is imperative not only in aiding assessment without oversight of the direct nature of the impact such policy would ultimately have on Australians, but also in recognition that the overall outcome is composed of the sum of individual effect. Support for the tax is driven by the goal to lower the extent of many individuals’ consumption of foods not conducive to achieving and maintaining body mass indices (BMI) in the healthy range. As those with BMIs beyond the healthy range are known to be at major risk for health conditions such as diabetes, sleep apnea, cardiovascular disease, and degenerative musculoskeletal disorders…