Mcculloch Vs. Maryland Case Study

Improved Essays
The first case that has established the power of the federal government by Supreme Court is McCulloch Vs Maryland. In 1816 Congress created a bank in the state of Maryland. Two years later Maryland Assembly passed a law to impose taxes on the bank. McCulloch was a cashier at the bank and refused to pay the tax. The Constitutional questions that were being asked Did Congress have the authority to establish the bank? Did the Maryland law unconstitutionally interfere with congressional powers? During the case Mr. Chief Justice said “Although, among the enumerated power of government, we do not find the word “bank” or “incorporation” we find the great powers to lay and collect taxes; to borrow money; to regulate commerce …”. Chief Justice Marshall

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Furlow, 04-CV-5887 Our File No. 5-987 Statement of Facts: John Brown sued his dentist, Dr. Thomas Furlow, claiming he was injured as a result of Dr. Furlow’s failure to extract an infected tooth on August 3. John Brown ignored Dr. Furlow’s recommendation to return because his tooth was infected. Mr. Brown then went on vacation and while on vacation he passed out due to infection, pain, and the infection spreading. Mr. Brown incurred medical expense and loss of wages. Furlow was served with a complaint on March 1.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Concerning the power of Congress to charter a bank, the Court turned to the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8, which expressly grants Congress the power to pass laws "necessary and proper" for the execution of its "enumerated powers." Maryland was unconstitutionally undermining the superior laws and institutions of the United States. Also Maryland 's tax violated constitutional sovereignty because it acted as a levy against all the people in the United States by a state accountable to only some of the…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case, Brady v. Maryland 373 U.S. 83, Certiorari was granted to a decision of the Court of Appeals of Maryland to consider whether petitioner was denied a federal right when the appeals court restricted its grant of a new murder trial to the question of punishment, leaving the determination of guilt undisturbed. The appeals court granted a retrial after holding that suppression of evidence by the state violated petitioner's rights under the Due Process Clause, U.S. Constitutional Amendment XIV (Law School Case Briefs, 2013). Furthermore, there was a judgement that had granted the petitioner a new murder trial that was solely based on the issue of his punishment. Since the petitioner was convicted of murder and then sentenced to death in his first trail with the Maryland Court, the petitioner was then informed that the Maryland Courts had withheld a statement that indicated that another individual had admitted that exact homicide. What the Supreme Court had concluded from this case was that, because of the suppression of the evidence was in favorable to an accused upon the request that violated the Due Process Clause required the court to a…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    McCulloch vs. Maryland is the court case that brought attention to expansion of federal power to the United States of America. The two main questions on why this case was brought to the Supreme court were…Did Congress have the power to establish the Second Bank of the United States of America? Did Maryland have the power to tax the bank? This case confirmed that Congress did have the power to establish the Bank, and Maryland did not have the power to tax the Bank. The Supreme Court ruled Congress had the power to establish the Bank in Article One, Section Eight of the Constitution using the elastic clause, stating Congress has the power to “make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution.”…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Mcculloch

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 18 of the United Sates Constitution, or the elastic clause, Congress does in fact possess the power and ability to establish a bank within the United States. 2. We further find that Maryland’s power of taxation violates the Constitution’s Section 8 of Article, within both Clause 18, and 1, in that Congress is specifically given the power to tax. Even more so, we found that Maryland’s power to tax is an interference of Congressional duty, and thus…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first question was answered when Marshall claimed that Marbury had a right for the writ of mandamus because he was appointed and followed procedures. The second answer was that the Supreme Court should provide a solution to Marbury’s inconveniences. Marshall also believed that the United States’ courts were at liberty to protect their citizens, no matter the situation. The third answer addressed judicial review because the “Court could not grant the writ because Section 13 of the Judicial Act of 1789… was unconstitutional insofar as it extended cases of original jurisdiction” (McBride). Marbury had rejected this act which inclined the Supreme Court to deny his position.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Court had the right to review acts of Congress and the actions of the President. If a law was found unconstitutional, the court could overrule it. Marshall wrote, “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” He argued the constitution is the Supreme law of the land and it has the final say over the meaning of the…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mcculloch V. Maryland

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Marshall court had a meaningful impact on the governmental government developed A lot. The court of mc McCulloch v Maryland was very serious. The cases the severe issue is if the court has the power to affirm a constant check on the other branches of the…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the case of Florida Bar v. McAliley, it is my position that it is a meritorious case. This case is about a male that used his status in the legal system to get what he wanted. It was found that McAliley filed frivolous motions in order to have a different outcome of the case between him and his ex-wife. McAliley did not want to pay child support there for he utilized numerous lawyers to file motions that were found to be a waste of the courts time. It was found that McAliley was held in contempt of court, suspended from his legal duties as well as requested that he get a mental evaluation to see if he was able to practice law.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A typical example was when Marshall used the Supreme Court to extend the power of the Federal government in McCulloch v. Maryland in 1819, Maryland enacted a law that requires all banks without a charter from the state to pay a tax and they are prohibited to print money without stamped paper from the state. The Chief Justice ruled that the Constitution allowed the national opportunity to establish a national bank. McCulloch v. Maryland was an important decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, which maintained the authority of Congress to create the Bank of the United States. In McCulloch case, Marshall simultaneously explained the jurisdiction of the court to interpret the constitution, the nature of the relationship the federal-state inherent in a federal system of government, and nature democratization of both the US government and its…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Opinion of the Court: McCullen v. Coakley The Eleanor McCullen against Martha Coakley, Attorney General of Massachusetts was a Supreme Court Issue in 2013. In 2000 Massachusetts Legislature created the Massachusetts Reproductive Health Care Facilities Act which stated that a buffer zone will be enforced around abortion clinics to prevent interference between those who are pro-life and pro-choice advocates. The final ruling from the Supreme Court was that the buffer zones did violate the First Amendment.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Madigan V. Avery, 50, of Bartlett, New Hampshire made her last joke about the Hamilton soundtrack before dying from Hamilton fans hitting her with Paintball guns on September 15, 2051. Madigan was shopping when one of her friends started playing Hamilton. She made a rather sarcastic joke about the Hamilton soundtrack which triggered Hamilton fan’s at the store. An hour later at approximately 3:45 p.m., fans surrounded her and began to attack her with paintballs. The people who attacked her are not to be named at this time because the attack is still under investigation.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Justices Scalia and Thomas. Scalia stated that “We have no power to decide this case. And even if we did, we have no power under the Constitution to invalidate the democratically adopted legislation.” Additionally, Scalia believed that the Supreme Court did not have the jurisdiction to review and decide the case. Both Justices believed that this case was about power.…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the word “federalism” was to be broken down, then the term itself must has something to deal with the federal government, or the US government as a whole. However, this terminology has a whole opposite concept of the word itself, literally. Federalism is an idea of government powers that are divided by the national government and the states’ governments. National government is the one that is in charge of mailing and sending troops to wars,while states governments are the ones handing the licensing of occupations or licenses like driver licenses. With all this being said, federalism varies depending on which time era you are in.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial Dbq Analysis

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Although a majority of documents convey the impression, to be against the Supreme Court having the power to question the constitutionality of federal laws; but the amount of documents that agree, have more solid evidence in their argument. The Supreme Court should have the power to overturn unconstitutional federal laws. Federalist No. 78, the Marbury v. Madison decision, Article III of the Constitution and the Judiciary Act of 1789 are prime examples to prove that the judicial branch has the authority to do so. First of all, in Federalist No. 78, written by Alexander Hamilton in 1788; declares that, “[The] courts were designed to be an intermediate body between the people and the legislature...”(Doc D).…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays