Civil Rights Vs. Civil Liberties

Superior Essays
Byerly 5
Ben Byerly Professor Sharifian 9/30/17 Govt 2305 Civil rights v. Civil Liberties Since the foundation of America, many people who lived in the new country struggled to obtain the basic civil rights and liberties that were necessary for a republic. Whether men were treated differently because of the color of their skin, gender, or ethnicity, the equality that was desired for Americans was not granted till the fourteenth amendment was passed. Unlike civil rights, civil liberties are constantly changing as terms are defined and the supreme court determines the correct ruling on cases. These two important topics are what protect and allows Americans to live luxurious lives compared to other nations. Civil rights and Civil liberties are
…show more content…
In today’s society, many people living in the United States of America do not know the difference between civil rights and civil liberties. 1 People often consider civil rights to be civil liberties. Civil liberties are individual rights that have been protected by the bill of rights against the state and local government actions through the process called selective incorporation. Selective incorporation is a process where the rights listed in the bill of rights are incorporated into the due process clause of the 14th amendment to protect them from state action. 2 The basic Civil liberties are found in the first ten amendments of the constitution, the bill of rights. Some of these include the right to a jury trial, freedom of religion, bear arms, be free from self-incrimination, etc. These liberties are legal guarantees while civil rights are not. Civil rights are the rights of the people to be treated equally no matter one’s religion, race, ethnicity, color, or gender. The basic Civil Rights of the people is stated in the 14th Amendment stating in section one, “No state shall. 3 deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. ” The term ‘due process’ requires states and governments to take the necessary precautions and safeguards when it comes to civil rights, but if necessary they can be taken, while Civil liberties …show more content…
The ACLU fought against these counties saying, “the displays violated the first amendments establishment clause, which prohibits the government from passing laws respecting an establishment of religion.” (OYEZ- ACLU v. McCreary County.) The supreme court agreed that it did violate the establishment clause by a 5-4 vote, by presenting biblical passages on walls as well as them in isolation. The ACLU v. McCreary County case is an example of a Civil Liberties case.
Civil rights and liberties are not understood by many but affect all. One must be willing to know their rights and liberties to successfully live a happy life in this great nation. Civil rights and liberties define who and what one will become.
6 Works Cited- "Schenck v. 7 United States." Oyez, 1 Oct. 7 2017, www.oyez.org/cases/1900-1940/249us47.
"McCreary County v. 1 American Civil Liberties Union of Ky." Oyez, 1 Oct. 2017, www.oyez.org/cases/2004/03-1693.
Scheneck v. 7 United States.” OYEZ, www.oyez.org/cases/1900-1940/249us47.
Staff, LII. 8 “14th Amendment.” LII / Legal Information Institute, 12 Nov. 2009, www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxiv.
Schenck v. United States.” LII / Legal Information Institute,

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    3. First Amendment: Van Orden v. Perry case is about Orden suing Texas about a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of the state capital building. The question is does a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of a state capitol building violate the First Amendment’s establishment clause. The decision was it does not.…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    4.2 Establishment Clause Does the display of the Ten Commandments in the counties' courthouses violate the Establishment Clause? Yes, the display of Ten Commandments in the McCreary and Pulaski counties courthouses violates the Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution because the clause prohibits federal, state, and local governments form establishing a government-sponsored religion or promoting one religion. In this case, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Kentucky, were aware that it was necessary to have a preliminary injunction, ordering the removal of the Ten comments from both courthouses because it was offensive and discriminatory for those people who are not Christians to be judge by a courthouse who are promoting this particular religion.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Boy Scouts of America v. Dale is a Supreme Court case that occurred in 2000. The question of the case was whether or not the application of New Jersey’s public accommodations law violated the Boy Scouts’ First Amendment right of expressive association to bar homosexuals from serving as troop leaders. Prior to the case, James Dale was the assistant scoutmaster of Troop 73. He had been an Eagle Scout, and after reaching the age limit at which he could be a member of the Boy Scouts, joined the adult division as an assistant. Around the time he joined the adults in Boy Scouts, he also left home to attend Rutgers University.…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    New York, which stated that “freedoms of speech and the press were fundamental rights that were protected under the due process clause.” (Curtis 71) This interpretation was used to “protect other rights against state infringement.” (Atherton…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Preamble Museum We The People Indian Removal Act The United States government wanted to expand more and they needed to force Native Americans out to do so. “By persuasion and force they have been made to retire from river to river and from mountain to mountain ... ... this fate surely awaits them if they remain within the limits of the states does not admit of a doubt.”…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Titcomb-Morales Mrs. Holt Legal Systems 4 October 2017 The 14 amendment is that no judge or any government official can take away you rights as a person such as someone’s: life, liberty, or property. This amendment has been used many times in history as a way to back up someone’s case. There are two famous cases that has occurred over time: Plessy vs. Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    April 14, 1873, the Supreme Court decided on a case centered around a state-created monopoly in the Louisiana slaughtering business. Competing companies in the business were arguing that the monopoly given to one company was unlawfully contradicting their “privileges and immunities”, and denying “equal protection of the law” (Finkelman, 1032). When the court delivered their decision, they dismissed all claims of 14th Amendment violation, and most importantly, they interpreted the context of the Privileges and Immunities Clause to apply to national citizenship, not state citizenship (“Slaughter-House Cases”). “The net effect of this ruling was that the Privileges and Immunities Clause could not serve as the vehicle to extend the Bill of Rights to the states” (Hudson). The court essentially gutted the clause and any of its potential with the precedent set in the Slaughter-House Cases, leaving the door open for the creation of Jim Crow laws and delaying selective incorporation until years into the…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During and after the Reconstruction Era, the US Supreme Court needed to interpret a substantive meaning of the 14th Amendment in a response to legal arguments brought by women and laborers. The US Supreme Court’s interpretation of the amendment’s Sec. 1 affected women’s legal rights in both positive and negative ways. The Sec. 1’s privileges and immunities clause undermined women’s legal rights in Bradwell vs. Illinois (1873) and Minor vs. Happersett (1875) by the US Supreme Court’s narrow interpretation and judges’ sexist attitude, but with progressive reformers’ efforts, the Sec. 1’s equal protection clause strengthened women’s legal rights in Muller vs. Oregon (1908). Muller went far to extend state protection over male laborers with Bunting…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The concept of racial injustice has been debated throughout American history; it has been especially evident in America’s legal system. No matter the decade, African-Americans have continually been wrongfully convicted for crimes they never committed. From Brown versus Mississippi (1934) to the case of Brian Banks (2002), one stands out amongst the others: the Scottsboro Trial. This case can be considered the epitome of injustice as the role of racism in the trial was extremely evident in the fact many of the boys’ rights were taken away and crucial evidence was ignored by jurors.…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Civil Rights

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Civil rights are rules that govern who can/cannot take part in the political process and regulations regarding how the government can treat its citizens. However, under the Fourteenth Amendment, the equal protection clause does not demand that everyone be treated equally. It is the state and federal courts that decide equality based on activity. States set drinking ages, driving ages, voting rights, etc. Also, states construct classifications permitting certain individuals to enlist in certain occupations.…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis Project: The Future Generation is Over Controlled Civil liberties, or personal freedoms are personal freedoms of thought, behavior, or expression that any authorities cannot abridge by law or by judicial interpret ion without due process. As one of the universal applications, personal freedom-a human right-should not be interpreted culturally or contextually(Franck, 593). For example, China’s Fundamental Rights and Duties of Citizens claims to protect many civil liberties. The U.S. constitution, especially the Fourteenth Amendment, protects civil rights by introducing a series of clauses. Hence, ideally, citizens should enjoy freedom from forced disappearance, freedom from torture, and also the right to security, privacy…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil rights are the rights for individuals to receive equal treatment in different settings such as education, employment, housing... Etc people seem to misunderstand civil rights with civil liberties the difference is that "Civil Rights" has revolved around the basic right to be free from unequal based on characteristics (race, gender, disability, etc.) While "civil Liberties" are more broad based and freedoms that are based at federal…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Liberties Assignment “Civil liberties concern basic rights and freedomes that are guaranteed – either explicity identified in the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, or interpreted through the years by courts and lawmakers.” It includes freedome of speech or the rights to be secure agaisnt unreasonable searches and seizures, which is also written in the Fourth Amendment, and more. The Fourth Amendment states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil liberties are fundamental human rights that the government cannot control and provides people protection from the government. On the other hand, civil rights are obligations required by civil society for civil participation to be achieved and require the government to be a part of in order to function properly. The difference between a civil liberty and a civil right is a civil liberty is a protection from the government and is considered to be natural privilege, however, a civil right involves the government to work with the people and is a civil duty. An example of a civil liberty would be the freedom of religion which means the government cannot control what religion is practiced by society protecting the people from the government controlling the people.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charter Of Rights

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Charter of Rights and Freedoms, created by late Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau in 1982, has strongly benefited Canada in a number of favourable ways. Prior to this Charter, Canada had a Bill of Rights. This Bill was inadequate since it did not apply to any of the provinces and it did little for the Federal Government on a constitutional bases. Due to the inadequacies of this Bill, it was confirmed that more effective constitutional framework needed to be adopted. As a result, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was created as a part of the Canadian constitution in 1982.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays