Case 1:
The main issue that some one was smoking marijuana in the class, professor locked the door of the class until the perpetrator inbeing identified. The student began to get anxious. Tyler grabbed the professor by her arm and shook her. Ron grabbed a piece of the door to hit the professor with it, the piece of the door instead hit Diana causing her an injury in her leg.
In this case Tyler physically strikes a professor and her put her in fear of immediate harm. He seized her and shook her that is assault and battery. Same time Ron by throwing a piece of the door but instead hit Diana. Both may face assault and battery plus Ron is responsible to what happened to Diana.
Aggravated assault and battery what both will face in the court of …show more content…
She and her friends drove back home from a party while all been drunk. She hit Kurt’s car, which he was driving on the wrong side of the two-way road. Katie who was not wearing a seatbelt fell and hurt herself.
Alexis is responsible in somehow. Driving under influence usually .08% the law presume that anyone could not go over. Alexis is being negligent by escorting them to the car. As well Katie is being negligence, she knew that need to wear seatbelt but did not. Ana is not responsible for her injuries that all fall on Katie. Both Ana and Kurt were liable to each other but each one can defend the situation by many reform law in the civil tort system.
In here Ana is committed aggravated DUI, she could pay between $500 to $ 1000, jail time and suspended driver license. Katie can sue both Ana and Kurt, but Ana can use Contributory negligence showing that Katie knows that Ana was drunk and still ride with her. Kurt could defend himself by using the assumption of risk that Katie knows Ana is driving while under alcohol and took the risk to ride with her …show more content…
He went to Kim yard and went up in her house’s roof to get the duck. At this moment he saw Kim and her friend singing and dancing. He took picture and uploaded them in the net.
Rich did not asked Kim a admission to step up in her yard, neither to climb her roof to get the duck. In all of this he took pictures of her and her friend and violate the privacy she has in her property.
Common law trespass is a crime when a person or the objectif of an individual intentionally get in the land of a different person without a lawful excuse. Taking picture or print or internet broadcast: libel is defamatory statement. Under Florida Law Fla. Stat.836.01(2005) any individual who publishes a libel is a first degree misdemeanor.
The right to a privacy is protected in the bill of right. He violated that right by taking pictures and uploaded them in YouTube. Rich is not supposing to get in Kim land until she knows or give him access.
The court need to rule in a favor of Kim and her friend of libel. The court also need to rule in a favor of Kim by the act of Rich trespassing her land without a legal
The main issue that some one was smoking marijuana in the class, professor locked the door of the class until the perpetrator inbeing identified. The student began to get anxious. Tyler grabbed the professor by her arm and shook her. Ron grabbed a piece of the door to hit the professor with it, the piece of the door instead hit Diana causing her an injury in her leg.
In this case Tyler physically strikes a professor and her put her in fear of immediate harm. He seized her and shook her that is assault and battery. Same time Ron by throwing a piece of the door but instead hit Diana. Both may face assault and battery plus Ron is responsible to what happened to Diana.
Aggravated assault and battery what both will face in the court of …show more content…
She and her friends drove back home from a party while all been drunk. She hit Kurt’s car, which he was driving on the wrong side of the two-way road. Katie who was not wearing a seatbelt fell and hurt herself.
Alexis is responsible in somehow. Driving under influence usually .08% the law presume that anyone could not go over. Alexis is being negligent by escorting them to the car. As well Katie is being negligence, she knew that need to wear seatbelt but did not. Ana is not responsible for her injuries that all fall on Katie. Both Ana and Kurt were liable to each other but each one can defend the situation by many reform law in the civil tort system.
In here Ana is committed aggravated DUI, she could pay between $500 to $ 1000, jail time and suspended driver license. Katie can sue both Ana and Kurt, but Ana can use Contributory negligence showing that Katie knows that Ana was drunk and still ride with her. Kurt could defend himself by using the assumption of risk that Katie knows Ana is driving while under alcohol and took the risk to ride with her …show more content…
He went to Kim yard and went up in her house’s roof to get the duck. At this moment he saw Kim and her friend singing and dancing. He took picture and uploaded them in the net.
Rich did not asked Kim a admission to step up in her yard, neither to climb her roof to get the duck. In all of this he took pictures of her and her friend and violate the privacy she has in her property.
Common law trespass is a crime when a person or the objectif of an individual intentionally get in the land of a different person without a lawful excuse. Taking picture or print or internet broadcast: libel is defamatory statement. Under Florida Law Fla. Stat.836.01(2005) any individual who publishes a libel is a first degree misdemeanor.
The right to a privacy is protected in the bill of right. He violated that right by taking pictures and uploaded them in YouTube. Rich is not supposing to get in Kim land until she knows or give him access.
The court need to rule in a favor of Kim and her friend of libel. The court also need to rule in a favor of Kim by the act of Rich trespassing her land without a legal