Macroevolution Research Paper

Evolution says that organisms would change their type by natural selection but this is only happened in microevolution. I will explain what is microevolution? Microevolution is about that the variation among the species. With environment changing, some species would change their type to adapt environment. But no matter how they change, they are still same species. This is microevolution. Evolutionist only can verify microevolution is true. However, can evolutionists prove that macroevolution is right? First, I will explain what is macroevolution. The species become the other species by natural selection is called macroevolution. The variation of macroevolution is cross over the range of species. Through Darwin's evolution can explain microevolution, evolutionist even can not prove macroevolution. …show more content…
Many people do not identify the difference of microevolution and macroevolution and think that Darwin's theory is suitable for all evolution. This is strange. The short monkey probably become the tall monkey. Does the monkey become the human? There has a good example to explain the difference of these two evolution. Microevolution can make the short giraffe become the tall giraffe. Macroevolution can make fishes become reptiles, make the new hands! Microevolution make the organs change their shape or size to adapt the environment and macroevolution make the organisms have new organs. How did the new organ pop up? Evolutionists can explain the organisms would change the type of organs to live in the environment but can not explain the origin of organs. Some people say new organs were produced by mutation but mutation sometimes occurs and often makes organisms die. Mutation is not a good way to explain the origin of new organs. If the origin of new organs can not be explained, macroevolution also can not be explained. Through evolution is a good hypothesis, it even can not prove macroevolution is