Machiavelli's Influence On Politics And Power

Improved Essays
The Renaissance was a period in which politics was in shambles. The Pope had military control, and even went to war with other Italian cities. Cities were divided with one another, fighting for power over one another. Other countries like France and Spain were not helping either, also engaging in wars for power and control over the cities. Basically, people were often fighting, invading, overthrowing their governments, things were in chaos. No government was as stable or powerful as the other, those who held power quickly fell. These events led to some drastic political changes, but it has also helped create some of the greatest political work ever. Men like Machiavelli and Castiglione have influenced politics that can still be considered …show more content…
The ideas of Castiglione and Machiavelli seem to differ when it comes to politics and power. Both considered to be a very influential men of the Renaissance. They both speak on similar topics, but they also have very different political …show more content…
A ruler must make a balance between hatred and fear, to avoid being overthrown by his people. Machiavelli also emphasizes the importance of staying independent as a leader. Machiavelli believes that depending on others can damage ones hold on power, especially if that person in power is influenced by his nobles. Machiavelli also understood political power by studying ancient political thinkers and those who ruled during his time. An example is an ancient historical figure called Agathocles. Machiavelli uses Agathocles as an example because of his use of violence as a way to gain power. Agathocles was a citizen and criminal who decided to join the military. Nevertheless, the man was devoted to the military and rose through the ranks quickly. He soon became military commander of Syracuse. Agathocles had ambitions to become a ruler, and to become a ruler, he used violent tactics to achieve just that. Agathocles committed many crimes and used brutal methods to reach his goal. Agathocles gathered the senate and other leaders to a meeting. Here, Agathocles became prince by killing the senate and other leaders. Machiavelli point Agathocles out because of his effective use of violence to become prince, but Machiavelli believed that such conduct

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the Italian cities, there was much conflict and arguments amongst the Borgia family who were focused on trying to seize and maintain power. Machiavelli in response, devised a text, The Prince, which illustrates how to run an effectual government. In The Prince, he also describes how the good and effective rulers have to learn “not to be good,” and that they have to be prepared and willing to put aside ethical concerns of justice and kindness, in order to preserve the balance of the state. This logic was atrocious to peers around him, for they were used to the old medieval ideas of ruling where the king was chosen by God to serve as someone on earth, who manages the law. They also saw that the ruler/king was an all-powerful human being with…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Instead, Machiavelli synchronizes the elites and the people. In chapter 26, there’s hard evidence that Machiavelli pushes anyone who has the virtu and fortuna(capable elites) to grab the opportunity and lead the people properly to have stable county that benefits both elites and the people. Machiavelli had enough of the past rulers always benefitting from Italy and not giving back to the people. Machiavelli is tired of seeing a country be rob, and see a great country being oppressed to reach its full potential. Then, to maintain in power, the support of the people are needed.…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He raises the question of whether it is better for a leader to be loved or feared by the public. He answers with the statement, “The reply is, that one ought to be both feared and loved, but as it is difficult for the two to go together, it is much safer to be feared than loved, if one of the two has to be wanting” (69). Machiavelli backs up this statement by saying that a leader who is feared can make decisions and execute orders much more effectively. He thinks a prince should be trusting to a certain degree, but should always be prepared for disaster, saying, “And the prince who has relied solely on their words, without making other preparations, is ruined…” (69). Machiavelli’s thought initially seems negative, as he lacks faith in the public to remain loyal to their prince.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli and Alvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca went through different experiences that led them to have their own perspectives in human nature and create their ideals for good governance. The simple fact that Cabeza de Vaca was unfortunate enough to have a hard time throughout the expedition made him more open minded about human nature, while Machiavelli had a set idea of what human nature was and how it ties to good governance. Machiavelli's view on human nature is the same as what is a good governance a good leader and a good human being is someone who knows how to be respected and feared without being hated and how that leads to have the people the Prince governs happy and on his side. Cabeza de Vaca has a more down to earth view on human nature but that differs…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Purpose of Government and if It Fails Machiavelli thinks that the most important feature of the government is to provide prosperity and stability, while Locke thinks it is the preservation of the property and the property rights, which go beyond the protection of the physical properties. Both men start from the same assumption that the government is able to provide its people with a possibility of coexistence and mutual respect for the future. Both men agree that, although coming from different angle, a government has a purpose, and if it fails to uphold the purpose, the subjects or the people can reconstitute the government. Machiavelli theorizes that the people in the state of nature (he thinks it as an individualistic setting "like…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Soon after the Medici family defeated the Republic of Florence armed forces’, the government dwindled. Once the regime changed, Niccolo Machiavelli, the Second Chancellor of the Republic of Florence, fell under serious false accusations of conspiring…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tyrant Archetype Essay

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This is a great example because as a tyrant, he started out wanting good for him and his society but realized he could do so much more with his power that he gained from his followers which lead him to do…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli and The Prince Introduction Niccolo Machiavelli is a famous statesman, thinker and one of the founders of modern political science. He was born in the year 1469 at Florence. That is the age of political chaos. The whole country was separated to city governments。In this case, he wrote his masterpiece, The Price, which to be as much praised as blamed. Machiavelli used terse and forceful words elaborate his argument, which had a profound influence in history.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For hundreds of years, civilizations have depended on rulers to manage the people and prevent anarchy from erupting. While some leaders execute these actions with ease, others fail to do so and often lose their states to opposing rulers or forces. Niccoló Machiavelli, an Italian philosopher who lived from 1469 to 1527, describes in his book, The Prince, the characteristics he deems necessary in a strong ruler. Throughout the book, Machiavelli uses leaders of his time, like Cesare Borgia and King Louis XII, as examples of what a person should or should not do in order to maintain or improve his state. However, a more recent leader who exemplifies the qualities outlined by Machiavelli is King Louis XIV of France, as he was content with being…

    • 1107 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli spent a large majority of his aristocratic platform defaming the many intrinsic characteristics of human emotion and experience. He consciously ignored the essential acts of care and compassion while promoting a message of fear and hate. His teachings offered detailed instructions on the succession and maintenance of a fear-abiding society encapsulated by submission. His philosophy stated that the best interest of the general public was to irrefutably follow the rule of law. To Machiavelli, a human life could be explained as an expendable resource, awaiting its designated task to serve the ruling class.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli’s Prince seeks to recruit and educate a ruler in the art of ruling. His ideal rulers are founders, men who created a fatherland and were not afraid to sacrifice lives and their self-interests for the common good. Machiavelli stresses that a ruler needs to appear virtuous while using vices when necessary to achieve positive results. Machiavelli teaches the ruler to divide his self. “It is essential, therefore, for a Prince […] to have learned how to be other than good, and to use or not use his goodness as necessity requires” (Machiavelli, 40).…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his book, Machiavelli believes that a ruler should educate himself by reading the history of the past rulers so that the ruler will have knowledge on how to go about wars. Glerberzon states, “ a prince should learn from records of practical or real experience”. Machiavelli’s theory is based on experience to gain knowledge, whereas Locke believes that society should look at reason and the rule of law rather than state of nature. Machiavelli believes that in order to be a good ruler, they have to be willing to be amoral. Glerberzon states, “a Prince must do whatever he has do [good or evil] to retain power, while always maintaining “the appearance of virtue” .…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I. Introduction: topic and each political theorist Throughout history many political thinkers have quoted the words of Niccolo Machiavelli. Founding father, John Adams and philosopher John Locke claimed to be students of Machiavelli (Viroli Intro). Machiavelli is considered a founder of political philosophy, but his work is not without opponents. Leo Strauss, a political philosopher, argued that Machiavelli was a “teacher of evil” in his book Thoughts on Machiavelli, written in 1958, in which he discusses his interpretation of Machiavelli’s work.…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In many political philosopher’s eyes, there is a special relationship between the ideas of moral goodness and legitimate authority. Some of these political philosophers believed that the use of political power was only morally correct if it was exercised under a ruler who had virtuous morals. These rulers who had virtuous morals were then told that in order to be successful, they needed to make decisions in accordance with the standards of ethical goodness. This moralistic view of authority is what Machiavelli criticizes in his work “The Prince.” In Machiavelli’s book, “The Prince,” the readers are introduced to political values that do not necessarily give full recognition to morality or religion.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He disregards the well being of the people, and instead focuses on the will of the prince. This is evident through his reasoning when providing options for rulers who had just acquired a nation in which the people have lived under liberty and freedom. Machiavelli’s first option is to simply destroy them, citing the Roman’s destruction of Capua, Carthage, and Numantia in their successful endeavor to control a free society. Machiavelli’s disregard for human life, coupled by the fact that he provides methods for ruling without seeking a means of good for the people, allows one to understand his definition of…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays