Life Without Parole Essay

Great Essays
Life Sentence, Thanks Consequences
Introduction
In a life full of choices, freedom can be overwhelming. Individuals have the choice to do as they please and live life without restraint. With that being considered, it’s incredibly easy to neglect that freedom and do bad with it rather than actual good. Here is where consequences come into play. For those juveniles that have been sentenced to life without parole, this is where consequences end that neglected freedom. Life without parole in juvenile delinquents has been a highly controversial topic for many years. In 2012, the official decision from the Supreme Court declared that life without parole (LWOP) should be banned for all juveniles. Life without parole should be seriously evaluated on its effectiveness by first looking at the history, then discussing how life without parole is a controversial sentencing, before lastly ending on where we stand now with LWOP and what can be done to make it better.
Literature Review
When regarding life without parole, it’s essential to examine the history of it and how life without parole became so controversial. Currently, the United States is the only country that sentences juveniles to life without parole (Rovner, 2016). This causes severe skepticism from other countries around the world. Within the last twenty years, we as a country have seen significant change regarding life without parole. This can be seen through incredibly critical court cases that changed history regarding life without parole. The first instance would be the court case Roper v. Simmons. In 2005, Roper v. Simmons banned execution of those who committed murder before age eighteen. The Supreme Court ruled that juveniles should not be sentenced to death, and that immaturity within juvenile time periods prohibits their sense of guilt (Life without Parole, 2012). The court went on to state that the death sentence for those younger than eighteen was seen as cruel and unusual punishment, a violation of the 8th amendment. The Roper ruling affected seventy-two juveniles that were currently on death row in twelve separate states. During the nearly three decades of legalized death penalty sentences for juveniles, starting in 1976 and ending in 2005 after the Roper decision, twenty-two individuals who had been charged has juveniles were put to death (Rovner, 2016). This sentencing impacted the juvenile justice system in a massive way. Now that the death penalty for juveniles was off of the table, life without parole became the most serious punishment. Overall, this case had both benefits and incredibly negative effects. The major overall benefit is that juveniles were no longer being put to death. At the time, Justice Kennedy stated that “children are constitutionally different from adults in their level of culpability (Rovner, 2016).” This is an accurate statement because children function differently from adults and don’t have the competency to assess situations like adults can. Therefore, children shouldn’t be put to death for bad actions because they don’t comprehend it to the same degree as adults. With that said, Roper v. Simmons also opened the door for some big issues that would soon be seen in other cases. Since the death penalty for juveniles was no longer available, the best option for the “harshest punishment” was that of life without parole. When a severe case came into the court room, life without parole was definitely on the table for punishment. So while this case was effective in the fact that children were no longer being put to death, it created other large problems that would soon be seen across the country. With life without parole being recognized as the harshest
…show more content…
For some, it may be seen as effective, whereas overall, life without parole is ineffective. Overall, it has come to the attention of some that life without parole is indeed bad. As stated previously, life without parole for juveniles is cruel and unusual. Juveniles can’t fully grasp what is happening because their brains haven’t fully developed to understand the full extent of the crime they may commit. Juveniles are young and at a stage in life where their moral views are developing and adapting (Brown & Birkenes, 2012). By sentencing a juvenile to life without parole, it strips the rights from juveniles to ever be rehabilitated and return to society to live a semi-normal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Sentencing wasn’t the only thing that ultimately affected these juveniles lives. Being young and locked away as a prisoner, is frightening, no support, and sometimes years of nothingness essentially leads many of these individuals to miss out on life, and…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hence, juveniles should not be sentenced to life without parole as they can also redeem themselves during their time of…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the reasons juveniles should not receive life sentences without parole is because juvenile brains are not fully developed until adulthood. According to Paul Thompson a USC neurologist researcher, “In terms of cognitive development, as research on the human brain [of juveniles] is far from adulthood” (Thompson). Adults need to understand that juveniles are still juveniles. When juveniles are charged with a heinous crime, like murder, they need to not overlook the fact that a juveniles brain is undeveloped.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For four years, America engaged in the most deadliest and effecting war known to history- World War II. Throughout this time period, more lives had been lost on and off the battlefield than any other war. In the beginning, the United States had hoped to be like a ghost, unseen as a part of the war and it was not until tragic struck the people of America until Roosevelt chose to join in. On December 7, 1941 -the attack on Pearl Harbor forced America to partake in the war. After this attack, over 100,000 lives would be changed within just a few months.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Alabama 567 U.S 460 (2012) instituted the penalizing of youths to “life without the possibility of parole” as unconstitutional. It was ruled that not allowing youths to be able to be released violated of the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution. This amendment states that punishments to those convicted of crimes should be fair and this sentencing of life was not (Oyez. 2012). In Colorado, the sentencing of automatic life without parole for juveniles was ended in 2006.…

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    All eyes were glued to the judge as he said the words that would change the juvenile’s life forever. He was being sentenced to life in prison as a part of a crime he committed with his friends. Many young adolescents some as young as 9 , are being forced to go to prison for long periods of time on an almost daily basis. Minor’s should not be allowed to be tried as adults and to be sentenced to life in prison, as an adult environment would be to brutal for them to cope with. In addition, most kids are very susceptible to peer pressure and often act on impulse in large groups.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Kids Get Life Essay

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The film When Kids Get Life presents the cases of five juveniles sentenced in Colorado to life in prison without the possibility of parole. This film explores whether juveniles should receive the types of sentences where there is no possibility of letting them out even if they changed or try to make up for anything they might’ve done. In the movie there are two major sides to this argument, one side being that they are the worst of the worst and they deserve what they got according to the family of the victims. The other side argues that the punishment is too harsh and that doesn't really represent what the defendants did but represents the revenge the victim’s family have. I agree with both arguments, but I lean more towards the argument of…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juveniles as young as 14 are being positioned in prisons with adults from minimum to maximum prisons. A minimum prison would house offenders who have committed a minor offense such as theft, while a maximum prison house felonies who have engaged in activities such as rape or murder. In 2005, the Supreme Court banned the death penalty ruling “people under 18 are immature, irresponsible, susceptible to peer-pressure and often capable of change (Scott, 2012).” Although, the court recognizes juveniles are immature, irresponsible, and susceptible to peer-pressure yet juveniles remain housed with adults. “For instance, several studies have reported a greater probability of recidivism for juveniles processed in the adult justice system compared with…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Horrendous crimes have to be committed in order to be sentenced without parole. There are currently many countries in the world that punish underage criminals without ever giving them the opportunity to be free again, such as the United States, where around 2000 young criminals are imprisoned. Athough some crimes are too atrocious to be ever forgiven, it is of fundamental importance to take into consideration that children and teenagers are not fully mentally, physically, and emotionally developed, and they should not, therefore, be treated as adults while tried. It can be argued that crimes such as rape, murder, and kidnapping are so horrible that the criminal individuals deserve not to be ever given an opportunity to be reintegrated into society again. These individuals have committed such terrible actions that it would be unfair as well as dangerous to give them a second chance.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    An estimated 250,000 youth are tried, sentenced, or incarcerated every year across the United States (campaign for youth justice). There is large controversy regarding whether or not children and young adults should be required to be sentenced as adults, regardless of their age and circumstance. This is believed to be the most logical way of approaching this matter because every case should undergo the same consequences despite the criminal’s circumstances. An opposing view would argue that it is necessary to take into consideration the situation of each criminal case before deciding on the punishment. They would also claim that children specifically, should be given another chance due to their lack of maturity.…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Allowing teenagers to receive the harshest sentence is not shared among all states. For, juveniles a mandatory life sentence without the possibility of parole is unconstitutional. The United States stands on sentences that give juveniles life without parole. There are about two thousand juveniles without parole given the chance, to have their case heard in Supreme Court decisions. But, there are nineteen states that have banned possibility of parole for juveniles.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Juveniles should not be tried as adults for it is wrong to hold adolescents, under the legal age, to adult standards. If children do not even receive the same rights as adults in the first place, it makes no sense to try them in adult court. These juveniles should have the opportunity to be rehabilitated in a positive manner, for they tend to come from troubled households and violent neighborhoods. In over half of the cases these troubled kids don’t know any different way than a life of crime when surrounded by both social and environmental factors that influence their delinquent actions. One must commemorate that juveniles are mentally underdeveloped, and still have time to innovate if their issues are dealt with precisely and accurately.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juveniles and Life Sentences Do juveniles deserve mandatory life in prison for their crimes or should they have the opportunity to receive a second chance? In 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that mandatory life sentences for any crime are now illegal to give to juveniles meaning that juveniles are no longer allowed to serve mandatory life sentences in prison. This ruling is agreeable because juveniles are not fully developed, and it is unfair for juveniles to serve mandatory life sentences. Juveniles do not deserve life sentences because the teenage brain is not fully developed.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal Sentencing Essay

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The criminal justice system maintains different goals when attempting to correct deviant and illicit behavior. In accordance to the sentencing guidelines established by United States Sentencing Commission (2011), punitive sentences are to incorporate a purpose for the sentence. Criminal sentencing can be categorized into six areas with distinctive goals: general and specific deterrence, incapacitation, retributive, rehabilitative, and equity/restitution. The sentencing goals are not exclusive and at times overlap in achieving its purpose. Furthermore, one goal is not better than another, but rather one would be more applicable in certain situations than another.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal Justice Frontline’s video, “Second Chance Kids,” takes its viewers through a controversial topic: life in prison for those who committed crimes as teens. Before the mid 2000s, teenagers who murdered someone get sentenced to life without parole. The arguments that teenagers grow up and change convinced courts to reconsider giving parole to those who were convicted for their crimes made as a teen. In one case, Anthony Rolon was 17 years old when he committed a crime. He was helping his father with selling drugs but a party next doors got really loud.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays