Liebeck V. Mcdonald's Restaurants Case Study

Improved Essays
Case Study of Liebeck v. McDonald’s Restaurants, P.T.S., Inc.
[New Mexico District Court, Bernalillo County, New Mexico, 1994]
Executive Summary The Liebeck v. McDonald’s Restaurants case, also known as the hot coffee lawsuit, was a controversial case that happened in 1994, sparking debates across the United States over tort reform . The plaintiff of the case, a woman in her late 70s named Stella Liebeck, was awarded 2.86 million dollars after suffering horrendous third degree burns across her pelvic region. The burns were caused by coffee that was served at over 80°C, scalding Liebeck’s skin in mere seconds after the drink was spilled. In this case study, the facts will be laid out and the court’s decision analyzed. Opinions will then be made based on our members’ impressions.
Details of the case
…show more content…
There, Liebeck purchased a simple cup of coffee from the drive through window. Contrary to popular belief, she wasn’t driving the car when she made the purchase; she was in the passenger’s seat of her grandson’s, Chris’s, car. Chris had parked the car somewhere so that her grandmother could add cream and sugar to her cup of coffee. As the car, a 1989 Ford Probe, did not have cup holders, Liebeck placed the cup of coffee between her knees and attempted to remove the lid of the coffee cup. As a result, the cup of coffee was spilled and the plaintiff’s cotton-based sweatpants quickly absorbed the burning coffee, holding it against her skin. She was quickly rushed to the hospital, though her injuries were serious enough to necessitate hospitalization for over a week and the usage of skin grafts. Even after the hospital stay, Liebeck required additional care for 3 weeks, tended by her

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo I. Introduction a. I picked the Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo case as my topic for my research paper. In this paper I will focus on the fundamental changes during the beginning to end of the case. I will also analyze the important facts that plaintiff and defendant used to testify during the trial. b, Peg Bouaphakeo and several former and current employees of Tyson Foods, Inc. sued the company's meat processing facilities in Storm Lake, Iowa.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A California Highway Patrol officer on Monday said he interviewed a woman that claimed Marci Kitchen admitted to her that she’d run over her own daughter her daughter’s friend on July 12, 2016, during a fatal collision in Fortuna. Testifying during a preliminary hearing in the Humboldt county courthouse, CHP officer William Adams said Marci Kitchen had asked a woman by the name of Ronda Rex to remove seven pounds of marijuana and a separate amount of alcohol from her jeep when she confessed. “I did it. I hit the girls,” Adams said recounting what Rex told him Marci Kitchen had said to her.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Durham v. McDonald’s Restaurants of Oklahoma, Inc. FACTS Camran Durham filed an intentional infliction of emotional distress lawsuit against his former employer, McDonald’s in Oklahoma. As he was denied three requests by McDonald’s manager which was his supervisor to take his prescription anti-seizure medication. After the denial of the last request the manager called him “f…ing retard”. Durham alleged that the refusals by the manager caused him to fear that he would suffer a seizure which made leave the work and not return. The federal court determined that the manager’s behavior was “not severe.”…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Now with the background of the case it will discuss how it relates to the final paper for the course, as well as why it is important and what problems may come from using this case as a primary…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everyone knows it’s not acceptable to look like the man at the tattoo parlor who has his whole body covered in tattoos and piercings while you are at work. What about small tattoos; are those acceptable? And what about a small piercings, such as nose or lip? Tattoos and piercings in the workplace create difficult situations resulting in court cases, job endangerment, business judgement, or resulting in concealing the body modification.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Baker V. Carr Case Study

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Q1 The main inquiry in Baker v. Carr was in the case of redistricting was a legitimate issue the courts could deliver proactively to revise manhandle or a political issue. The state contended that it was a political issue, so the courts had no purview. The case demonstrated a standout amongst the most debilitating in the Supreme Court's history, with the choice held over for re-contention on the grounds that the court couldn't achieve a lion's share choice. Equity Charles Evans Whittaker was so resentful about the case, he at long last recused himself from the choice, and the worry over the choice may have added to his initial retirement from the Court.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Burwell v. Hobby Lobby was a case between Sylvia Burwell, the secretary of Health and Human Services, and Hobby Lobby’s owners and founders. This case dealt with the issue of should Hobby Lobby be able to deny employees contraceptives on the health care provided for the workers by the business. This case was a case between workers’ healthcare and religious rights. This case gains attention and the Supreme Courts elect to hear it. They come to the decision that Hobby Lobby should be left their religious freedoms.…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The above context gave explanation to the courts of why the company made the decisions they did; what was presented in both cases displays both strengths and weaknesses. We the legal team believes that with the details of each case and the laws that provides assistance the final judgment will be favorable for Greene 's…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many people believe that contraceptives should be required in employment based health care. In the Burwell vs. Hobby Lobby supreme court case, this is highlighted. This case is an important part of what’s going on in the U.S. today. This case gives people more freedom of religion, but takes away contraceptives that some people that need a job may not be able to afford. The most important points in this case are the background info, court process, and the Supreme Court Decision.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Burger King Case Study

    • 5506 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Court of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County. NADEL et al., Appellants, v. BURGER KING CORPORATION et al., Appellees. No. C-960489. -- May 21, 1997 Edward J. Felson and Stephen R. Felson, Cincinnati, for appellants. Jonathan P. Saxton, Cincinnati, for appellee Burger King Corporation.…

    • 5506 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme case McDonald v. Chicago was about several suites that were filed against Chicago and Oak Park in Illinois challenging their gun bans after the Supreme Court issued its opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller. Specifically In 1982 the City of Chicago adopted a handgun ban to combat crime and minimize handgun related deaths and injuries. Chicago’s law required anyone who wanted to own a handgun to register it. The registration process was complex. In practice, most Chicago residents were banned from possessing handguns.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    McDonald vs Chicago is a five-to-four win for proponents of Second Amendment rights. This is the first case in over forty years to address the issue of whether the Bill of Rights is incorporated against the states. It's so important because it incorporates the Second Amendment right of individual gun ownership into the Fourteenth Amendment so that right will apply against the states. It will lead to legal challenges to other state and firearms regulations. And also confines judicially enforceable constitutional rights to only those rights that are deeply rooted in history and…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For decades, public health officials have advocated for dietary changes and increased exercise to combat obesity; however, since obesity was declared a public health crisis in the late 1990s, many different groups have preached their own solutions as well. One of these groups includes lawyers, who have made numerous arguments in front of courts attacking fast food companies as the source of obesity. However, Elizabeth M. Williams, an attorney who is also the president of the Southern Food and Beverage Museum, opposes this form of “obesity law” in her article published in Gastronomica magazine, “The Sixth Deadly Sin.” In “The Sixth Deadly Sin,” Williams uses critical descriptions, variations in syntax, and rhetorical questions to refute obesity…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commision was heard by the US Supreme Court December 5, 2017 and will be decided in 2018. The owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop, Jack Phillips, is a christian man that designs cakes in the store. David Mullins and Charlie Craig are a same sex couple that went to Masterpiece Cakeshop with the intent of buying a wedding cake. David and Charlie asked to order a cake for their wedding, but Phillips told them that he would not make the wedding cake because it denied his religious beliefs. Phillips still offered to serve them, but he refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex marriage.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Burwell v, Hobby Lobby is a court case that resulted from an issue which addresses the necessity of closely held corporations supplying birth control to its employees. The argument of this case is regarding the mandatory requirement to supply coverage for birth control. Hobby Lobby feels the mandate will also cover birth control options that also includes the abortion pill. Hobby Lobby opposed to this idea and due to their religious beliefs. they believe that they should not be required to supply such coverage for birth control under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the Free Exercise Clause.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays