Rawlsian Vs Libertarian

Improved Essays
"There is nothing to take a man 's freedom away from him, save other men. To be free, a man must be free of his brothers. That is freedom. That and nothing else." (Anthem). There are many different definitions of freedom and freedom means different things to every individual person. For that reason, I think that is why there are different groups, such as the Libertarian’s and Rawlsian. Both of these groups have principles that relate to freedom, but just like every individual they have the different looks on how freedom should be dispersed.
After reading the chapters about Libertarians and Rawlsian, I am able to see where the two groups have their differences about freedom. Libertarians believe that individuals should have the choice of freedom.
…show more content…
Just like the libertarians they have an idea or principle on what the nature of freedom should mean. Their idea is based around social contract. According to the novel social contract is “a hypothetical agreement in an original position of equality”. The bases between this concept or idea is two principles, the first principle is providing equal basic liberties for all citizens. For example, the book mentioned freedom of speech and religion. The next principle that goes with the concept of social contract is concerns about social and economic equality. The way that I interoperated this principle was relating it to money. The novel talks about the distribution of income and wealth and how to make equal for all citizens, along with allowing citizens to have the freedom to do what they want with their income and …show more content…
Although it is better for me then it was for them, it is still an issue that some women have to deal with. I feel that Rawls theory or idea on freedom is important because he finds equal opportunity for all an important issue. I think that sometimes people like to overlook that issue because for years it was sat on the back burner, and no one ever really brought it up. It has always been there but never brought up in a conversation. With Rawls theory this issue is being brought up and is a stepping stone for all individuals to have equal opportunity. There are many different examples that the idea of the importance of equal opportunity has a major positive effect. The example I shared is an example that I was able to relate the theory to my own life

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    I think it is important for the freedom not be restricted to one group or type of people but, rather, everyone, equally. This exact reasoning is why I believe that universal healthcare should definitely be a thing. Though, through Obama Care we are nearly there, the laws and regulations within that law are being threatened to be disbanded so I am now more than ever pushing for equal healthcare. Along with equal healthcare , I believe that everyone should have the equal opportunity to be successful in life and be able to graduate. I believe that we should work on closing the achievement gap in education.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, let's tare that quote apart, “to be free,” what is freedom? Being able to do what you want? Or is it knowing you can do anything, with no limits? To be free means that you have no limits to what you can do.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the novel, Anthem by Ayn Rand, it portrayed a lot of characteristics that relate to libertarianism. Looking back at old assignments, “Libertarianism is a theory of justice which claims that we owe to one another absolute respect for individual liberty rights. They proclaim a doctrine of self-ownership--i.e. the right to use one's body and resources as one sees fit so long as one does not interfere with the rights of others to do the same.” There are a lot of events that happened in the novel that show a libertarian way of life.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle argues that some people are just born to be slaves, it’s in their nature to be obedient. “Some people,” he said, “were born natural slaves. They differ from ordinary people in the same way that the body differs from the soul. Such people are by nature slaves, and it is better for them…to be ruled by a master. Just as are some are by nature free, so others are by nature slaves, and for these latter the condition of slavery is both essential and just”…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To be free, a man must be free of his brothers. That is freedom. That and nothing else” (Rand 101 ). He wants the freedom of being himself and an individual. This relates to our society because we support individualism of everyone.…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Karl Marx, John Rawls, and Robert Nozick are three prominent philosophers whose political theories have an important place in the modern political debate about the role of the state, how society should be structured and the concept of justice. Karl Marx was born 1818, his major work was The Communist Manifesto published in 1848. Marx advocated for a type of socialism called communism where the dominant goals are the abolition of private property and class antagonisms through a revolution of the proletariat or working class. John Rawls was born in 1921, his major work was A Theory of Justice published in 1971. Rawl’s defended social liberalism, egalitarianism, and the welfare state in the form of distributive justice.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In analyzing the Wealth Inequality in America, there are three political approaches that can be used. All of the three approaches are categorized under political liberalism which emphasizes individualism. The first approach is libertarianism, the second approach is free market conservatism, and the third approached is liberal contractarianism. Libertarianism is a laissez fair approach to political liberalism that advocates minimal government intervention within the lives of its citizens.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues that a person's liberty is what is most important and should be a priority. The second principle is called the “Difference Principle” which requires social and economic inequalities to be modified so that they can produce an outcome that is fair and equal to all. Rawls’ notion of justice as fairness demands that distribution of the goods of society should be consciously structured in order to provide a fair distribution. His last argument ensures that no one is advantaged or disadvantaged in society, this is called the social contract theory. The “original position” is the main component on Rawls’ social contract account of justice, it allows us to figure out what principle of justice people in society would agree to if we lived in a society of total freedom.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Injustices of Mass Incarceration of African Americans Since 1980, the United States has seen an unprecedented rise in incarceration rates. The United States is only 5% of the world population, yet it has 25% of the world’s prisoners. Currently, the US is the world’s leader in incarceration with 2.3 million people currently in jail and prisons. That is a 500 percent increase over the last forty years. These incarceration rates, mostly which runs independent of crime rates, are suggested to be the result of policy changes over the last 30 to 35 years.…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom is helping others when it is needed. Helping when not only our allies but others who have troubled times. If we can not help many people that are poor then why bother helping a few of the rich. Being free is helping those who need it poor or rich, enemy or allie. Both Kennedy and Roosevelt have a very good way of viewing what freedom means to…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Licensing and Laissez Faire” a case that talks about the pros and cons about the regulations that there are in many professions for a person to practice today. It is shown that many professions have too many requirements, which causes many people to abandon the desire to pursuit these careers. Milton Friedman, was a Nobel Prize-winning economist at the University of Chicago that criticize licensure due to the lack of freedom that it gave people. Friedman had a different point of view when it came to this topic. The example that is use in this case is the medical care profession.…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Rawls in his book Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (2001) characterizes how idealized reasoners, reason in order to validate the two “principles of justice” (42) in a “basic structure” (10) leading to a “well-ordered society” (8). The idealized reasoners do some kind of calculation. With the “original position” (14) and the “veil of ignorance” (15) idealized reasoners can understand the “difference principle” (61). This is an important element of creating a well-ordered society. Mills finds issue with how Rawls uses this ideal as something we should follow.…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Thomas Jefferson’s “Declaration of Independence” he explains freedom by writing “and that as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do” leading to the simple answer of; freedom is having the power to do as one pleases (344). In “Nature,” “Self-Reliance,” and “Walden,” Ralph Waldo Emerson and David Thoreau both utilize their writings to demonstrate similar themes about freedom that Jefferson explained. Emerson is an advocate for freedom for all people regardless of gender, age, social status, etc. Through “Nature” and “Self-Reliance” readers understand freedom can be reached through nature,…

    • 1062 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although both John Rawls and Martha Nussbaum are considered respected philosophers, their approaches to the theory of social justice differ immensely. In this paper, I will demonstrate the flaws and strong points of their approaches to social justice and determine which is more persuasive. More specifically, I will analyze Rawls’s social contract type approach to Nussbaum’s proposed “Capabilities Approach” and directly apply them to the issue of people with disabilities. Lastly, I intend to present a personal opinion on these two theories of social justice based on my ethical framework.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Earth is currently facing detrimental environmental issues. These issues have been evident for decades; however, many people have continuously denied them to be problematic or even their existence entirely. While these critics have managed to get away with the rejection of these problems for many years, it is no longer deniable that the issue of environmental degradation is very real and in need of immediate action. Much of the population has come to understand this, and have executed a variety of modest attempts to increase environmental sustainability. However, these efforts have demonstrated to be of minimal effect in solving the large-scale issues directly causing the degradation.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays