In the following paper will be drawing on an idea of Leibniz, the principle of reason then further discussed and critiqued on Heidegger’s idea on the principle of sufficient reason, also will be discussing Husserl’s Crisis of European Science.
Sufficient reason is always a question that people and philosopher like to ask.
Generally, reasoning is a thing that can improve knowledge, make better decisions for people. This is a question itself occupies a special position in science, technology and also daily life.
Leibniz stated sufficient reason is one of the basic laws of traditional logic of logicians. Human reasoning is based on two principles, first- Contradiction. Second, is sufficient reason.
Heidegger draw an example from Leibniz had …show more content…
Why does the “Rose” being rose and without a reason?
But rose does have causes in the ordinary sense. To predicate that everything have a reason to being here, “Being” here is a reason; being is being. Reason is following explanation of why it being here.
For human, to include a “Sufficient reason” in the field of science is a must. It is a first principle to provide the correction, these shows how important that “Sufficient reason” in science field is. If the reason is not exist, so people can not define that is truth or fantasy. As discussed at the beginning, the existence of “Sufficient reason” has a meaning to being here for to be a “Reason”.
Moreover, there is limitation of people exploring the “reason”. Human, is part of the planet, it is just one of the role who are playing in this situation. Human can not provide a reason why human is here, only “God” can.
The rose is without why; rose did not explain why “She” is here but human do. Roses and human have a reason to exist, except roses do not ask the reason of why they are …show more content…
What is basis? Where is the basis? He leaded the next generation to small space to think of the principle of reason. For people who have their own thought have to draw on his ideas of the principle of sufficient reason and further explain the basis of sufficient reason.
Can we not find a reason to being human and why human need to be human?
Pretended there is God exists, and god intended to create a World which is now we called planet or earth. First, how many world god did created? Is it just this world? Or there is World B? If there is World B, why god created two worlds instead of just this world human living in? Or pretend god only created this world, why isn’t god creating other world instead of this one?
So if the principle of sufficient reason is necessary, is every fact necessary?
These is those question human do not need to know, there is no doubt to say.
To pretend that human knew the answer of how many world existed in the universe, does it matter? Maybe the UFO is the other World that God has created. The world is big, the nature of condition human still can not be control, how can they find out if there is another world exist( this is just a
Sufficient reason is always a question that people and philosopher like to ask.
Generally, reasoning is a thing that can improve knowledge, make better decisions for people. This is a question itself occupies a special position in science, technology and also daily life.
Leibniz stated sufficient reason is one of the basic laws of traditional logic of logicians. Human reasoning is based on two principles, first- Contradiction. Second, is sufficient reason.
Heidegger draw an example from Leibniz had …show more content…
Why does the “Rose” being rose and without a reason?
But rose does have causes in the ordinary sense. To predicate that everything have a reason to being here, “Being” here is a reason; being is being. Reason is following explanation of why it being here.
For human, to include a “Sufficient reason” in the field of science is a must. It is a first principle to provide the correction, these shows how important that “Sufficient reason” in science field is. If the reason is not exist, so people can not define that is truth or fantasy. As discussed at the beginning, the existence of “Sufficient reason” has a meaning to being here for to be a “Reason”.
Moreover, there is limitation of people exploring the “reason”. Human, is part of the planet, it is just one of the role who are playing in this situation. Human can not provide a reason why human is here, only “God” can.
The rose is without why; rose did not explain why “She” is here but human do. Roses and human have a reason to exist, except roses do not ask the reason of why they are …show more content…
What is basis? Where is the basis? He leaded the next generation to small space to think of the principle of reason. For people who have their own thought have to draw on his ideas of the principle of sufficient reason and further explain the basis of sufficient reason.
Can we not find a reason to being human and why human need to be human?
Pretended there is God exists, and god intended to create a World which is now we called planet or earth. First, how many world god did created? Is it just this world? Or there is World B? If there is World B, why god created two worlds instead of just this world human living in? Or pretend god only created this world, why isn’t god creating other world instead of this one?
So if the principle of sufficient reason is necessary, is every fact necessary?
These is those question human do not need to know, there is no doubt to say.
To pretend that human knew the answer of how many world existed in the universe, does it matter? Maybe the UFO is the other World that God has created. The world is big, the nature of condition human still can not be control, how can they find out if there is another world exist( this is just a