Knights Vs Samurai

Knights Vs. Samurai: Who Would Win?
By Seng, Sydney

During the medieval period, both Europe and Japan had their own specific warriors. One was the knight who represented Europe, and the other was the Samurai that represented Japan. Both had their own culture and beliefs that existed solely in their part of the world at the time. Though the two groups of warriors were extremely similar, samurai would win a battle due to their expanse of armor, strict code, and rigorous training. The first way samurai have an advantage over knights in battle is through their armor. In document D written by Terry Bennett, it states, “Samurai did not wear their armor on their right arm so they could easily draw their bow…” This was an advantage for the samurai. Easy access to their bow was necessary to attack. Although it seems like a disadvantage to be exposed, quick and stealthy attacks in battle may result in victory for their side. Another piece of evidence that supports the claim is also from document D. It states, “...small iron scales were tied together, lacquered, and then bound into armor plates with silk or leather cords.” This armor seemed to be lighter and more versatile than the knights heavy metal armor. It allowed them to move without as much weight on their backs, making them quicker. There are still many reasons to why a samurai …show more content…
In document C, adapted from Japan: Memoirs of a Secret Empire, it states “The rigorous training of samurai began when they were children.” Samurai started their training as children, allowing them to have years of experience until finally being granted access to battle. It also states in the same document that, “Samurai were expected to live according to Bushido…” Samurai were heavily influenced by their code and based most of their decisions as a warrior on it, as it was hardwired into their brain for studying it so long. Their training assured that they were loyal