Keystone Pipeline Benefits

Improved Essays
After evaluating both the environmental impacts of the Keystone XL Pipeline as well as the economic benefits it would ensure, our group opposes its completion. As previously mentioned, although the pipeline would allow Canada to achieve economic success and provide energy security for the United States, these benefits do not outweigh the costs. According to Dr. Jerald L. Schnoor, a distinguished professor of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Iowa, the EPA has been developing new regulations to promote fuel efficiency that would save people thousands of dollars in fuel costs, which would decrease the demand for oil (Schnoor, 3943). Rather than focusing on the potential economic success of the pipeline, we should assess …show more content…
("Keystone XL Pipeline: Why Is It so Disputed?" BBC News). The completed, operating pipeline would allow our society to not only continue our negative ecological consumer habits, it would encourage us to expand and amplify these practices. In the article, BBC News stated that the pipeline has received immense opposition from various community members and groups because of the risk of spillage that could create health hazards for residents in the surrounding area ("Keystone XL Pipeline: Why Is It so Disputed?" BBC News). Another negative effect of the pipeline is that it violates treaty agreements between the First nations people in Northern Alberta and the Canadian federal government. BBC News states, “First Nations groups...have even gone so far as to sue the provincial and federal government for damages from 15 years of oil sands development they were not consulted on” ("Keystone XL Pipeline: Why Is It so Disputed?" BBC News ). The damages caused by this pipeline ultimately serve as an example of the continued marginalization of indigenous people and the exploitation their homelands by large corporations and governments who are supposed to protect

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Also in the article Should the United States Authorize the Keystone XL Pipeline to Import Tar Sand Oil from Canada, it talks about how, "Indigenous peoples (known as First Nations) in Canada are taking the lead to stop the largest industrial project on Mother Earth: the Tar Sands Gig project. Northern Alberta is ground zero with over 20 corporations operating in the tar sands sacrifice zone, with expanded developments being planned. The cultural heritage, land, ecosystems and human health of First Nation communities... are being sacrificed for oil money in what has been termed a 'slow industrial genocide'. Infrastructure projects linked to the tar sands expansion such as... the Keystone XL pipeline, threaten First Nation communities in British…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though there are many reasons to support why Keystone XL pipeline will be a very good idea, there are also many reasons that support that the oppositions gave the reasons why this Keystone XL Pipeline will be a problem to society. A lot of people opposite this idea of building the Keystone XL pipeline, because they consider this pipeline will not create as many jobs as it is promised. “Energy and Commerce Ranking Member Henry Waxman (D-CA) went as far as to argue that pipeline jobs are not "real jobs" - a stance that several labor unions representing millions of American workers might be surprised to hear. After all, organized labor has lined up in support of this pipeline because of the jobs it would provide for union workers” (Energy).…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The largest argument against the pipeline is that it will run directly through the Lakota Sioux tribe’s burial ground and sacred sites (Reuters, 2016). Environmentalists also worry that the pipeline will break. If the pipeline breaks, the Lakota will no longer have clean drinking water, and the surrounding area will be devastated. In the Lakota Tribe, there is a prophecy that a “black snake” slithers above the ground, and when it goes underground, it will devastate the earth.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Standing Rock protesters VS Army Corps of Engineers. A group of 200 Native Americans stood among the Standing Rock Indian Reservation on April 1st, 2016 to protest against the 3.7 billion Dakota Access oil pipeline. The Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) is a pipeline that transfers 470,000 barrels of unpurified oil from Bakken North Dakota to a terminus near Patoka, Illinois (Epstien, 2016). On July 26th, 2016, The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approved the final word for the land easement and water crossing to allow the pipeline to move forward.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The protesters argue that the pipe with harm the environment and burial grounds. Thankfully the pipeline can not be constructed until the easement is granted. Sadly the easement is supposed to be given to the project's sponsor Energy Transfer Partners at the latest this Wednesday afternoon.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Keystone XL Pipeline is one of the most controversial policy issues in the last few years. Hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent on not only physical pipeline building but also on lobbyist movements to either approve or vote down the proposed pipeline. With potentially massive environmental effects looming, the battle between an environmentally conscious president and an opposing Congress has grown into an international dispute. Legislation for the pipeline was first introduced in 2008 when TransCanada “began construction the Keystone Pipeline after the United States issued a Presidential Permit authorizing the construction, maintenance, of the pipeline along the border of the United States and Canada” (O’Rourke) Despite Canadian…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Keystone Pipeline

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Bill McKibben’s article, “Why Dakota Is the New Keystone,” expresses how Native Americans want to live peacefully without their history and culture in danger of this pipeline. The United States Army verses Native Americans is a big point in this article. McKibben clearly states how this battle has gone on for a while now and has caused a tremendous amount of damage. “The shocking images of the National Guard destroying tepees and sweat lodges and arresting elders”.…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    South Dakotan Native Americans who own property on the Lakota reservation engaged in non-violent protest “to protect their sacred water and other natural resources” as one tribal elder remarked that “there is no way for Native people to say no – there never has been (Hotakainen).” Claims of eminent domain, which have historically been used to justify encroachment on tribal property and function centrally in the legal reasoning behind the Keystone XL proposal, almost always work in the interest of Whites and at the expense of Indian property rights, even though they claim to be race-blind. Property rights of Native Americans are under unique attack: It is inconceivable, for example, that the federal government would use eminent domain to justify the construction of an intrusive pipeline in Fairfax, Virginia. The very nature of eminent domain prevents non-political minorities from effectively representing their interests because they are forced to take the position of defending property rights against a formidable (if false) construction of the public’s best interest. As a result, proposals such as the Keystone XL pipeline turn public opinion against Native American groups and reduce the legitimacy of their claims to exclusive property on…

    • 1793 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perhaps one of the most widely debated topics, in recent years, is the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline. The completion of the project has been done in multiple phases and one of the last phases scheduled to be completed is the phase 4 extension. This extension would create a pipeline that would trek, around 2000 miles, from Alberta Canada to the gulf coast of Texas (Friends of the Earth). Since the pipeline would cross international borders, approval from congress would be necessary in order to begin construction (NPR). The two main issue points on the topic are the economic gains that could incur from the development of the pipeline and the overall impression on the environment that would ensue from extraction, transportation, and refining of the oil.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dakota Access Pipeline does not necessarily have a ‘finite amount of resources’ to be dealt with, rather it focuses on the possibility of harming or ruining a large resource that would have a large impact on many people, particularly the Standing Rock Sioux. According to Time Magazine, “The pipeline would travel underneath the Missouri River, the primary drinking water source for the Standing Rock Sioux, a tribe of around 10,000 with…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The history of Native Americans is entirely made up of violence since then, as the hostile government policies of today and demolition of cultural identities further strip what were problems since the 1830s and beyond. The Standing Rock Sioux fear the pipeline will pollute their drinking water, and claim that it will disturb ancient burial grounds and has violated the terms of a prior 1851…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Past Relationship The relationship between the government of Canada and Indigenous people has been a struggle to say the least. In 2012 bill C-45 was proposed, bill C-45 challenged Indigenous sovereignty and Indigenous philosophy involving mother earth. Indigenous people believe that knowledge is rooted in the land because it contains languages, stories and histories of the people (King, 218). The land also provides all the basic needs for survival, food water and shelter but most importantly the land is home (King, 218).…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ken Winston, a member of the Nebraskan Sierra Club—an environmental group—boldly opposes the pipeline stating it will be one of the most, “environmentally destructive activities on the planet”(as cited in Sachs, 2014). This statement shows that environmentalists have no desire in seeing the pipeline built. They also have concern regarding the use of the pipeline—if it is built. A major concern is that “TransCanada forecasted the pipeline would leak no more than 1.4 times a decade. In reality, it spilled 14 times in its first year alone”(Wieners, 2014).…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States’ has been using oil to fuel the needs of people and businesses for an extensive period of time. The country’s reliance on oil is a huge factor in maintaining the stability of the country. Though many advocate as to why the Keystone XL Pipeline will leave a positive impact on the country through economic prosperity and secured borders, many are consumed by the thoughts of potential damages and…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Keystone Pipeline is a Legitimate Issue and Should Not Be Approved The controversy surrounding the Keystone XL Pipeline proposal steams from very legitimate concerns. While the issue has attracted support from some parties, it is apparent that many, including environmental activists, civilians and politician have strongly opposed the move, but the big question is, what are the specific reasons is in all this? According to Natural Resource Defense Council, NADR a New York based natural environment gives a comprehensive account why the move will be disastrous not only to natural environment but also to people (NADR). In addition, other non- partisan organizations like the Friends of Earth have also voiced their opposition to…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays