Karl Marx And Adam Smith: Most Influential People In The Modern Age

Improved Essays
Both Karl Marx and Adam Smith are considerably two of the most influential people in the modern age. While the theory of Marxism might be superior on paper, in reality it is impossible; unlike Smith’s theory of capitalism is more suited for the real world. Although, both had wanted to create the perfect society where everyone is happy. Adam Smith, who was born in Scotland in 1723, had the idea of achieving a perfect society through a capitalistic approach. Karl Marx, who was born in 1818 and the creator of Marxism, criticized capitalism and believed in individual freedom. They differed in their views on human nature, human work and the best state. Smith believed that many people acted out on their own self-interests, and when allowed to do what interested them it produced a market, which manufactures perfect liberty. In Smith’s theory of human nature, Smith suggests that human nature will turn the generosity of the rich to the poor out of sympathy for their condition. Marx did not agree with Smith’s view of human nature. Marx said that, because it was always in the economic interest of capita to take advantage of workers, nothing could persuade capitalists to change their ways. He thought peaceful progress towards equality and social …show more content…
Marx, known the be the founder of communism, suggested revolution against the state in order to create a more evenhanded society; while Smith preferred stability and peace instead. Smith’s ideal society didn’t get rid of the different wealth levels between different society classes. Marx’s ideal society would produce and distribute according to the need of the public; he wanted to get rid of economic class distinction. It is evident that both men are two of the most influential men throughout history with very different theories they believe are best for benefiting

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    All in all, Marx and Carriage had two very distinct approaches in how society should function, but Carnegie better is more rational because it excludes the possibility of a revolution. One topic that Carnegie and Marx disagree with is class relations. Carnegie believed that people who worked hard deserved to have a successful life, however, he does suggest that affluent should deal diminishing the gap between the rich and poor. He states “The best minds will thus have reached a stage of development of the race in which it is clearly seen that no mode of disposing of surplus wealth creditable to thoughtful and earnest men into whose hands it flows save by using it year by year for the general good.”(372).…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Smith was apart of the Scottish enlightenment and was very worried about the wealth of the nation. Also he worried about the social consequences of the divisions of labor. Smith thought that people would bet better off if they were more interested in personal gain. Smith believed that the divisions of labour would make people’s person gain peck. If people were not able to advance it would have a negative affect on society.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the many centuries and decades that have passed us by there were many great philosophers. These brilliant minds created theories, examples, and opinions on topics that are still controversial in our time today. The two that I’d like to draw attention to are Andrew Carnegie and Karl Marx. Although, their opinions are similar they have different standpoints on the ways our economies would become more efficient. In the Gospel of Wealth, Carnegie’s views were open-minded.…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx believed that a violent overthrow of capitalism would lead to international socialism based on common ownership of land and capital. This would transform into an ideal state of communism, which is a worker-governed society based on the guiding concept “from each according to ability, and to each according to need” (Bolotta, Hawkes, Mahoney, Piper, 2002, pg. 58). This theory influenced many revolutions that would take place in the world. For example, the Russian Revolution in 1917, led by Lenin who said he has the philosophical heir to Marx (Schaff, 2009). Both Marx and Lenin are considered to be the two most important figures in the development of communism in the Soviet Union.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since, Karl Marx and Adam Smith has voiced their ideas in an economic society, there has been changes to social class and labor. Much of Marx teaching has developed a dark side to him, however his theories are held within the economy today. Adam Smith had many advantages because he had positive ideals on how to work with the citizens. Much of the importance of economics has to do with consumers and their choices and Adam Smith has proved to make an economy better than Karl…

    • 1112 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism The Crucible

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Imagine living in a world where no human oppresses another. Imagine living in a world where no one is poor and no one is rich. Imagine living in a world where the social class system is non-existent. Karl Marx, a 19th century philosopher, foresaw the image of this apparent communist utopia forming in every society; he expected the maltreated working classes to fight back against those who have immense, misused power. He believed that material possessions have a powerful enough influence on our lives to be considered the sole reason of historical change.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adam Smith was an economist from the mid-late 1700’s and he was able to explain the knowledge of Capitalism; elaborating on how to make money from the free markets that was influential to survival at that time. He wrote a book, An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, which describes the origins of Capitalism in great details with petty examples of this logic set in motion. On the other side of the spectrum, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels both produce a collaborative piece called The Communist Manifesto which heavily criticizes the bourgeoisie, and pushes for a lifestyle in which all property is government owned; eliminating the class system and having all people of the nation work for the same salary. There is a stark…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adam Smith vs. Karl Marx In the most recent election, an actual socialist ran. This raised many questions and Bernie Sanders has fooled millions of people into thinking about the viability of a socialistic government in the United States. Derrick Wilburn in his article, “Is capitalism really better than socialism or communism?” makes a case for American capitalism and attempts to convince those on the fence that socialism and communism are “the height of human arrogance.” Wilburn argues in his article that despite people’s best intentions, socialism and communism is a set up for an era of governmental rule and the slow diminishment of individual freedoms.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, Mill does not believe it is in the nature of people of backward society or in the nature of children to be free because these are the types of people who needs to be educated first before they have the opportunity and chance to be free or else it will be futile for them to improve and progress at this stage as humans. Marx on the other hand, believes that the Socialist revolution can only happen in industrialized country. It is not that the nature of the people in the country are of a better natures than others, but because the country themselves has the capital necessary to sustain the people. This is refuting Marx’s optimistic belief on human nature and his claim that people are inherently good to maintain and sustain a society through their moral and work ethics that they do not need the government’s help to maintain their communities. Marx probably view that by taking down the bourgeoisie and capitalists, the ruling class now will be the working class in which the society can still sustain itself because the government still can support the people through the capital the government has an the industries and commerce that are still producing goods to sell.…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marx Vs America Essay

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages

    While Carnegie thinks a society should be run by the hands of the few businessmen, Marx thinks that the government should be the central of distribution. They both agree that the changes in history is because of inequality, although Carnegie welcomes inequality and argues it is needed in society. Marx on the other hand, thinks a large gap of inequality is bad for a society, because people would not be entitled with same opportunities. In order to build a society, both seem to reason that money needs to be distributed into society. While Marx believes that every capital should be divided equally, Carnegie still thinks people have the right to the capital they earn.…

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever wondered where all the ideal ideas for American government came from. ”The Age of Enlightenment” or “The Age of Reason” was the age when people gave new bright ideas towards the government. A lot of the ideas for American government came from the Enlightenment period. Philosophers from the 17th and the 18th century a lot of ideas of great ideas on the topics of religious,social,economic,and political freedoms. Adam Smith believed that people were free and they can pursue whatever they wanted.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Conflicting Views of Adam Smith and Karl Marx on the Division of Labor and the Role of Money in Exchange In their works, Adam Smith and Karl Marx prove to have differing opinions on money and the division of labor. Although they understand money as a representation of value and as a medium of exchange, they arrive at different conclusions about the role of money in social life. Smith sees the division of labor as a constructive system and a means of furthering exchange, leading to the use of money. Marx, on the other hand, finds labor to turn human beings into alienated workers, and the division of labor to spread and increase this concept.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carl Marx was, and currently remains one of the most influential philosophers in the modern world. Marx was a revolutionary communist whose works boasted great influence in the formation of the modern world through inspiring the foundation of many communist regimes in the twentieth century; perhaps most notably, the Soviet Union. Among the many facets of life Marx philosophized, he placed a great sum of interest and influence on the very concept of private property ownership on behalf of a nations citizens on account of his moral opposition to the notion of materialism. Marx emphasized the great divide in society in which is rooted in the ability for common citizens the ability to maintain authority over one another through wealth, and according…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The True Utopian Society

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Adam Smith states that the advantages and disadvantages of each job should counterbalance each other, thus becoming equal in nature. From the perspective of a laborer with light or easy work, a communistic society would offer him the ideal employment and pay for his job while someone with heavy tasks, such as a miner, would find the society to be unfair against him. Implications can be made that the previous communistic societies have failed due to the uprisings that occurred due…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The teachings of Karl Marx and Marxism has always been my favorite theoretical perspective because it has been misunderstood over time. One of the best things about Marxism is that it stressed the importance of social equality and the issues that the system of capitalism created in society. Marx argued that capitalism was hindrance to freedom because only those who have money can really enjoy freedom. The Marxist theory in the simplest perspective is that “Marxism emphasizes the idea that social life is based upon "conflicts of interest".…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays