Kant's Categorical Imperative

Improved Essays
Finally, let us dissect the genius ideology that Sir Immanuel Kant wished everyone would use to have a more perfect system of government in what is now well known as the categorical imperative. Kant attentively elucidates the bases for the structure of metaphysics to morals. He presumed that there had to be a universal proposition that was “purely based on abstraction” that will direct us to the right set of principles we could use at any given time. (Kant,Cahn, 97) Characterizing two forms of imperatives (a mandate to act in a particular fashion), a categorical and hypothetical imperative, Kant has the means to setting up some groundwork of moral behavior we choose to act out on.The first of the two is is the hypothetical imperative that is merely the act of carrying out an …show more content…
This belief is premised upon not acting coercively to acquire an action or thing you may be preying upon. Absolutely nobody likes being used heinously to help someone for malicious reasons, so it should then be self-evident to not treat others as objects. Instead, all humans should strive to help any people who are in need of your help as an end. To refrain from acting like a numbskull could help prevent so many predicaments that come from not thinking. This method will force you to think before you say anything and always use the same measures of treating others as the ones you’d like to be treated with. Similarities one could draw to this philosophy would be that of Aristotle’s virtue in which they both essential promote virtue as their means of acting. They both believed that treating situations with a good moral scope is what one ought to do when handling difficult problems. A beautiful quality that the categorical imperative can hoist proudly is that it is the most universal ideology that can lead to almost the same result no matter who the agent

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Some people may think determining the morality of an action as an easy task, and fail to realize that it is no easy task. Every action is driven by other actions, and depending on the circumstances, an act may be moral in some cases and not in others. This is why Kant favors the Categorical Imperative when compared to other methods of determining morality. The Categorical Imperative does not deal with circumstances, instead it denotes an all-encompassing rule that, if obeyed, means actions would be moral no matter what the situation may be. He first describes the Categorical Imperative when he states, “I should never act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law” (Kant 14).…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hypothetical Imperatives

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Philippa Foot in her text “Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives” argues against the claim that moral judgments cannot be hypothetical imperatives, first presented by the philosopher Immanuel Kant. As found in her introduction on page 68-69 of the textbook, her argument is that moral judgments are categorical rather than hypothetical. But before one can explain her argument one must define and explain what hypothetical and categorical imperatives are. Kant himself wrote all imperatives command either hypothetically or categorically. He says that hypothetical imperatives “present the practical necessity of a possible action as a means to achieving something else which one desires.”…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The two types are a contradiction in conception and a contradiction of will. A contradiction in conception is when I attempt to imagine a world in which everyone acts from my maxim, I find that in doing so, the maxim would never be successful. This is a violation in perfect duty which is a duty that we must fulfill in all circumstances and at all times. When I try and fail to universalize my maxim, due to the creation of a contradiction in conception, I know that I have a perfect duty not to perform the proposed action found in the maxim. An example of a contradiction in conception would be if I borrowed money from a friend and falsely promised them that I would pay them back, even though I knew I did not have the money to pay them back.…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The categorical imperative means that anytime an act is made, it must be able to stand as a universal law. It provides us with a pattern of morals that does not contain anthropological information. There are five major complaints to Kant’s theory. First, people believe that it is too hard to apply to real life. Next, it does not include enough acts that are common in real life.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The duty or obligation in professional environments to do what is right is held at a higher expectation than the morality of individuals in their personal lives. To further explain if a person was at work and they are there because they desired money then they ought to work this is an example of hypothetical imperative. However, to explain categorical imperatives into the workplace if an individual desires money the “action is good in itself and ought to be chosen, regardless of one’s desires and ends.” So choosing to work is not chosen because of an individual's personal desires but rather because it is their duty/obligation to do because it is good. This is acting within a maxim which in Kant’s perspective is the only way in which one should act, because to do the right thing is done only for the reason that it is…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second formula of Kant’s Categorical Imperative illustrates that to be a moral it is necessary to treat every human being as an end, never as means. Regarding the sexual relationship of the human being, if someone does not seek her partner’s consent to be engaged in sex, he then humiliates his partner by considering her merely as means. In fact, his behavior is equivalent to a rapist because none of them get consent from the opposite, therefore is immoral. But, this sort of philosophical thinking does not go hand in hand with the religious thinking. Hence, I would like to discuss that Islam, one of the major religions on the planet, seems to be reluctant about the consent of women at the time of intercourse.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second formulation of the Imperative is a topic Immanuel Kant strongly believed: “Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One’s moral compromise, integrity, honesty, or if you will be compromising your virtues are the issues that are at stake in the article. One of the points of the author was that if engaging in that behavior does not put anyone in danger it is acceptable; however, it can be argued on the morals of the individual. For example – cheating, just because 99% of the class is cheating in an exam does that mean its ok for you to cheat as well? that is something morally questionable in that case.…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    According to Kant, a good will is good not for the reason of its consequences, or the purpose of its action, and what it may achieve. If we are to take out of its con and pro, its value will still remain, and that indicated an action of good will is simply good, it’s an action of viture, and vuntilary. Kant talked about other goods that are desirable because their qualification, and the good consequences brings us pleasure and happiness. Although they may be good, but unlike good will they are not absolutely good. These goods, such as wealth, while it can bring happiness, but they can also become bad, depends on the motivation, wealth could bring greed, unlike good will, these are tools.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, this is where Kant’s categorical imperatives come into play. As stated before, the first is that we are to never treat people as a means. Secondly, we are to adhere to a maxim that can govern all people and eventually become universal law. There is an incredible difference between a categorical imperative and a hypothetical imperative. The difference is evident because to the Kantian, morality should be based on the categorical imperative, or something that is help to be good in any scenario at any time.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The hypothetical imperatives on the other hand, is not universal and only applies to those whose desires match with the imperatives. For example, if the imperative was to write an essay if one desires a good grade, the imperative would only apply to those who wished for a good grade. If one did not care about getting a good grade or not, this imperative would not apply to them. These imperatives are conditional and are solely followed based on whether or not one’s desires are in accordance with the imperative, which is why Kant believes that the categorical imperative is superior to the hypothetical imperative due to its…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    For Kant, one essential characteristic of morality is that it is a duty to action, an unconditional, categorical imperative to act. An imperative is said to be either hypothetical or categorical. Kant writes, "If now the action is good only as a means to something else, then the imperative is hypothetical; if it is conceived as good in itself and consequently as being necessarily the principle of a will which of itself conforms to reason, then it is categorical . . . . " We must act or follow accordingly as what the imperative requires us, to fulfill responsibilities in accordance to the…

    • 1826 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Kant holds that the fundamental principle of our moral duties is a categorical imperative” (Johnson & Cureton, 2018). Simply, categorical imperatives are actions that people choose to do or not do based solely on their morals. Whereas, “Hypothetical imperatives tell you what to do in order to achieve a particular goal” (Holt, 2009). For example, when people use an if/then scenario to arrive at a specific conclusion in order to accomplish a desired effect. In addition, Jeremy Schwartz published that “Recently, the idea that every hypothetical imperative must somehow be ‘backed up’ by a prior categorical imperative has gained a certain influence among Kant interpreters and ethicists influenced by Kant” (2010).…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A categorical imperative is an unconditional moral obligation that is binding in all circumstances and is not dependent on a person’s inclination. It provides us with a way to evaluate whether an action is moral or not. There are three formulations to test a categorical imperative: the Formula of Universal Law (FUL), the Formula of the Law of Nature (FLN), and the Formula of Humanity as an End. The first formulation tests to see if a universalized maxim contradicts itself, and thus, cannot be universalized as a basis of action without causing confusion. The second formulation asks if an individual would choose to live in a world where the universalized maxim is followed at all times.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the movie My Sister’s Keeper, Sara and Brian Breslin make the decision to conceive their daughter Ana through in vitro to donate compatible organs to their daughter Kate who suffers from acute promyelocytic leukemia. The ethical issue in this movie is the decision Ana’s parents made to go through with genetic pre-implementation with the specific goal of saving their older daughter Kate. The moral agent, Ana, faces moral obligations to save her sister by serving as an organ bank. She is at the center of an ethical dilemma as she has to decide what is best for her and her family.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays