Kant And David Hume Comparison

Great Essays
Paul D. Cottingham
Fr. Kurt Messick
Epistemology
September 13, 2014

Kant’s and Hume’s epistemology

Immanuel Kant and David Hume were notable philosophers within the modern era, each with their own respective ideology and philosophy; Kant was influenced by rationalism, crafted a theory after the Copernican Revolution explaining the role of human reason in obtaining knowledge, whereas Hume, who was influenced by skepticism, put an end to pure reason and an end to the Enlightenment Era. In the following term paper I will first give a definition of epistemology, followed by explaining in detail Kant’s distinction between analytical and synthetical judgments as well as compare the similarities and differences between Kant’s distinction between
…show more content…
This is where justification is suppose to come in if I believe it to be true, and it is actually true. Generally, it is agreed upon that justification has no truth to it if: it is wishful thinking “e.g. I really wish that I was skinny so I believe I am skinny”, fear or guilt, “e.g., I get all freaked out about death and so this forms the belief in an afterlife”, or it is something that I made a wild guess over which I formed in the wrong way, “e.g., when I traveled to Vietnam I knew nothing about the country, when I exited through the airport doors I saw a flesh colored speck from afar and I concluded that it was a white”, dumb tuck, “e.g., off the top of my head I formed the belief that around the next corner I will come upon an Argo Tea shop. Low and behold, what do you expect the next corner I came to there sets an Argo Tea Shop”. Justification seems even harder to distinguish since beliefs come in all shapes and sizes and it’s not easy to find a single theory that can atone for everything we claim to want to know. It boils down to fact that it is possible for justification on belief that Wadsworth, OH is about 224 miles from Charleston, WV; differently than I would be on the belief that God existents or that you have an ingrown toenail. No matter how it is looked upon, this is the center piece of any knowledge of

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Essay 3 Given what we know or can safely assume to be true of animal brains and behaviors, do animals actually exhibit thought and reason? The answer depends in large measure on one’s definition of thought and reason. Philosophers René Descartes and David Hume hold conflicting views about the nature and possession of thought and reason and, as a result, offer starkly different arguments for and against the existence of thought and reason in animals. While Descartes maintains in Part Five of Discourse on Method that only humans are capable of conscious thought, Hume asserts that human and animal behaviors are not so different in Section Nine of his An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s critique of consequentialism comes from his principle of morality, more specifically the categorical imperative, and how it is immoral to use an individual as merely as a means to an ends and not be treated as ends in themselves. This theory is in distinct contrast with the principles of consequentialism because the theory is based on the fact that the consequences of a conduct determines whether the conduct is right or wrong. The individual would thus be a slave of utility maximization because their actions would solely be based off of reaping the best possible results. Therefore, meaning that consequentialism does not take into account the morally relevant difference between acts and omissions because consequentialism ignores moral…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though Aristotle was not a direct student under Plato at The Academy, he became and developed into one of the most famous Greek philosophers. After his years spent at The Academy, Aristotle developed his moral of philosophy in his book the Nicomachean Ethics. In this book, Aristotle explains the origin, nature, and development of virtues, which are essential for achieving the best and highest good that human beings are capable of, which is happiness. According to Aristotle, happiness is defined as to live well and do well, where virtue is key, but alone it is not enough. In order to be happy, you need full virtue across a complete life, which means that you need to regularly perform all the virtues.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justifying belief and what is knowledge’s nature and scope is well defined by the philosophical stance of “naturalized epistemology” in that knowledge comes from the empirical sciences though it’s application of theory, methods and results. Knowledge comes from proving things. This is different from the classical foundationalism which asserts the need to basic belief from which other beliefs can be built on. This essay will discuss the distinctiveness of naturalized epistemology, then how it differs from classical foundationalism and conclude with why it is referable. It should be noted that both systems of knowledge have many variations and so this short essay is more a general discussion.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In contrast to the Scientific Revolution, the Enlightenment did not represent the expansion of new ideas for intellectuals only but humanity as a whole. While both periods of discovery sought to expand and develop new ideas about the world around us, the latter was centralized around the social sciences (rather than the natural sciences). Consequently, Enlightenment thinkers believed that the advancement of society lay in the hands of everyone. As a result, the common man could become an integral part of new thought; they were encouraged to “Dare to Know,” as Kant wrote in An Answer to the Question: What is the Enlightenment (Enlightenment Documents, 3). Despite this positive attitude around advancing human thought during the 18th century, the question of how to achieve such goals remained.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant Vs Aristotle

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Kant and Aristotle both have differing stances when it comes to the entirety of philosophy. First, before I delve into the details that differentiate the two from each other, I will first expand upon Kantian ethics and the virtues of Aristotle. After doing so, I will follow by explaining the underlying problem that each philosopher has, as both Kant and Aristotle each have their own issues. Following this will be the major differences between the two, such as how they perceive life and duties. There is a major distinction amongst Aristotle and Kant, a distinction which rests upon the core of each individuals methods of insight.…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Holden Gilbertson Philosophy 101 Dr. Fletcher RAP Assignment Kant Vs. Mill Mill believe that the consequences of actions determine its moral worth. While Both Philosophers have a good argument on the process of making decisions. Mill believes in utilitarianism and thinks that actions are based off of happiness.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I am going to explain the thoughts of myself, Clifford, James, and Hume about justified beliefs and how our views compare. More specifically, I will explain why I think we are sometimes justified in believing something we cannot prove, why I think we are justified in believing something as a matter of faith or ideology, how an evidentialist (Clifford) and a pragmatist (James) would respond to these same questions, how some kinds of beliefs that we cannot prove are more justified than others and what sort of justification they have, and how Hume and his idea of induction play into these matters of justified vs unjustified beliefs. Additionally, I will consider the strongest objections to our thoughts on these matters. I have decided that we…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hume discusses much about how morality is just based off of our own volition. I believe this to be true. Hume extends on this further stating impulse arises not from reason, but is only directed by it. While humans have a general knowledge of right and wrong, it ultimately is up to our passions and sensations that drive us to our moral decisions. I find Hume to have a very original, thought out, and realistic take on how moral decisions are derived and where reason stands in one’s decision making.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume was one of the most influential philosophers of his time and continues to be mentioned and studies to this day. Almost equally as impressive was the response that philosopher Immanuel Kant had to his Inquiry of Human Understanding. Kant attempted to respond to Hume’s ideas and in this essay, I will identify the Hume’s beliefs behind the concepts such as cause, and effect and I will later defend Kant’s response to Hume. He raises points that leave his reader with a deeper understanding of his concept and explicitly outlines his beliefs on the concepts that Hume covers in his Human Inquiry.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Traditionally, epistemology has been defined as the theory of knowledge in which the primary goal has been to obtain truth while avoiding false beliefs . Knowledge was defined and universally accepted to be “Justified True Belief”. However, this was challenged when Edmund Gettier released a 1963 paper which demonstrated that justified true beliefs are intuitively not sufficient for knowledge due to epistemic luck. This sudden revelation triggered “a cottage industry of knowledge-analysers” , all of whom were unsuccessful in their attempts to overcome or bypass the Gettier cases by defining a fourth ‘anti-Gettier’ condition.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume and Immanuel Kant are both known for their great contributions to moral philosophy. Hume who is mainly known for his empiricism, skepticism and naturalism and Kant who is best recognized for his great work in metaphysics, ethics and also for his contributions in others disciplines in the area of philosophy. Although they were both exceptional philosophers and gave stupendous apports, Hume and Kant agreed nor differed in various aspect and ideas. Hume believed and is mostly based on his empiricism which involves the theory of the mind. Hume’s empiricism consist in to affirm that the moral foundation is not in the reason but in the senses.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke's Argument Against Innate Ideas

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    The first of these arguments was that there is no universal assent; the second argument was that if innate ideas are through reason, then they are deduced and lastly, the third argument was that if self-evidences is equal to innateness, the consequences of innate ideas end with something absurd. It touched on Locke’s general concept of experience and how we in fact experience things through reflection and sensation. Lastly, examples of supporting and opposing arguments and ideas on the subject matter were discussed as a way of comparing the ideas in all of…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two of the most intriguing schools of philosophy are the two which deal specifically with epistemology, or, what is better known as the origin of knowledge. Although they are not completely opposite of one another, they are argued in depth by two of the most famous philosophers in history. The origins of study in rationalism and empiricism can be found in the 17th century, during a time when various significant developments were made in the fields of astronomy and mechanics. These advancements undoubtedly led to the questions that probed the sudden philosophical argument: What do we truly know? Many people throughout history began to question whether science was really providing them with the true knowledge of reality.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant and Aristotle have similarities and differences when it comes to their ethical theories. Both men believed in logically understanding what was right and moral, but just in different ways. Kant mainly focused on Humans being ends rather than the means to achieving the happiest life possible. Aristotle focused on the “Golden Mean” between emotion and action. Using Sandal’s “Jumping the Queue” and “Markets in Life and Death”, Kant and Aristotle ‘s similarities and differences will become more evident.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays