Summary Of Machiavelli's The Republic

Great Essays
Books of the past can still relate to how society is today. Especially when the book is about political philosophy or political science. Political philosophy is the study of politics, liberty, justice, law, and rights, which leads into why these things are needed, as well as what makes a legitimate government, what rights should or should not be protected and why. Political science is about possessing the knowledge of dealing with systems within a government, the behavior of the government and the examination of political actions. One of the most famous ancient Greek philosophers was Plato, and the book he is known for is The Republic, which was written around 380 B.C. The book is about political philosophy and concerns the definitions of justice …show more content…
The first 25 chapters are guidelines for situations the ruler will experience and what to do to avoid or overcome those experiences. The first few chapters in the book are about how to gain power and keep power. Gaining power comes from understanding which principality the prince is conquering and how to rule each specific principality. Principalities can be hereditary or new. They can also be ruled with the help of ministers or nobles. Ministers are appointed by the prince and help keep the attention on the prince where as nobles are not appointed and have their own groups of influence. It is also important to understand if the prince gains power through buying it, then they are weak and will not know how to rule. The middle of the chapters explain ruling with an army, war and how a prince should act. Princes can have their own troops, mercenary troops or auxiliary troops. For war, a prince must study successful rulers past and their strategies during war such as Moses, Cyrus, Romulus and Theseus, as well as study the geography of their area. This prince should act as a man beast. Machiavelli’s definition of a man beast is that man is the law and beast is the force. So the ruler should use laws as a man and force as a beast to maintain power. Once power is achieved, maintaining it consist of appointing either nobles or ministers. A ruler must avoid being hated at all costs. This is done by not taking property or …show more content…
The State for Plato will be at its best if the people are treated as many. Plato said this in the middle of book IV talking about the State. “I do not mean to say in reputation or appearance, but in deed and truth,” (Internet Classics). This is where Machiavelli greatly disagrees. In Machiavelli’s principality, one has to have a good reputation in order to align with other principalities in the area so they will not be at risk of being conquered. For example, if a principality is known for a weak reputation, than there is nothing from stopping a neighboring ruler from coming to conquer the principality because in Machiavelli’s practical guide for ruling, the more land the prince conquers, the more praise they will be met with from the subjects. Another area where Machiavelli disagrees with Plato is on property. In the state everyone should be equal and not have property to him or herself. If he or she had his or her own property, then that would be unequal, thus others becoming unhappy and breaking the harmony in the state. Machiavelli on the other had says property of the subjects must be left alone so that the subjects remain happy. If the ruler takes away property from the subjects, then those subjects will become unhappy with the ruler and revolt against them. Both Plato and Machiavelli’s view on property is like today; assuming

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli’s Prince seeks to recruit and educate a ruler in the art of ruling. His ideal rulers are founders, men who created a fatherland and were not afraid to sacrifice lives and their self-interests for the common good. Machiavelli stresses that a ruler needs to appear virtuous while using vices when necessary to achieve positive results. Machiavelli teaches the ruler to divide his self. “It is essential, therefore, for a Prince […] to have learned how to be other than good, and to use or not use his goodness as necessity requires” (Machiavelli, 40).…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli’s book The Prince is a guide on how a proper prince should rule his nation. Machiavelli demonstrates how the past rulers have either been successful or not. Even as his audience were that of monarchs, many of his teachings’ outcomes can be seen in present day. In chapter 12, Machiavelli comments on the usage of mercenary troops.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli spent a large majority of his aristocratic platform defaming the many intrinsic characteristics of human emotion and experience. He consciously ignored the essential acts of care and compassion while promoting a message of fear and hate. His teachings offered detailed instructions on the succession and maintenance of a fear-abiding society encapsulated by submission. His philosophy stated that the best interest of the general public was to irrefutably follow the rule of law. To Machiavelli, a human life could be explained as an expendable resource, awaiting its designated task to serve the ruling class.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli and Alvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca went through different experiences that led them to have their own perspectives in human nature and create their ideals for good governance. The simple fact that Cabeza de Vaca was unfortunate enough to have a hard time throughout the expedition made him more open minded about human nature, while Machiavelli had a set idea of what human nature was and how it ties to good governance. Machiavelli's view on human nature is the same as what is a good governance a good leader and a good human being is someone who knows how to be respected and feared without being hated and how that leads to have the people the Prince governs happy and on his side. Cabeza de Vaca has a more down to earth view on human nature but that differs…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Machiavelli and Socrates both lived during times of uncertainty, political fragmentation and violence, their philosophies about how the state should conduct itself are in direct contrast with one another. Machiavelli’s the Prince is founded on the principal that if a ruler wishes to maintain power, he should embody the ideology of pragmatism, while Socrates believes the state should follow him in his commitment to moral purity and justice. The inherent dissonance between these philosophies would lead Socrates to be unsupportive of Machiavelli’s concept of a prince, and consequently the political system Machiavelli would recommend he install, despite his apparent change in rhetoric from the Apology to the Crito. Throughout Plato’s interpretation…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stocker T5.6 The chapter I chose to analyze is from chapter nine, the section in which Machiavelli discusses the best ways to have and maintain a civil principality. Machiavelli does so by using the example of Nabis, prince of Sparta. Nabis who kept his country and his city safe and sustained a siege. Machiavelli says that because the citizens were not hostile toward Nabis, when the imminent danger neared him, Nabis only had to “secure himself against a few subjects.”…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Prince, Machiavelli writes on how a prince is to take power and how to maintain his position (Ryan, 2012, p.364). The concept of virtù is introduced, as an essential component that a prince must possess. It could be translated as the ability, quality or determination that secures political success (Ryan, 2012, p.375). Machiavelli finds an example of a virtuous prince in Cesare Borgia, described as a skillful leader who was only defeated by the negative effects of fortuna (Ryan, 2012, p.371). On the other hand, Agathocles is presented as a tyrant, whose form of ruling was dishonorable.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato’s Republic and Machiavelli’s The Prince depict their views of both the duties and the ideal personas that rulers should strive towards. Socrates, in Republic, strives to discover truth in the creation of a hypothetical “perfect city,” in which all citizens are just and fair to each other. His Philosopher King was designed to rule this ideal city, and as such this is a perfect and ideal figure. Having been educated only in the just for his whole life, this Philosopher King is always virtuous, and relies purely on this virtue to be a good ruler for his people.…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since human beings first started to roam the Earth, there have always been hierarchies within our small communities and large societies. These social structures have helped lead civilizations by making difficult decisions that would hopefully be advantageous to the masses and to give their respective community some security and stability in their lives. Technically, you could call this group of people a government. For centuries on end, governments have been equally analyzed as well as criticized plus we have been given innumerable perspectives on this extremely broad topic. With that being said, there are five main philosophers who gave their input about politics, humanity and society.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ideas that Machiavelli displays are the true ideals of the era, however, the irony and satire surrounding how they are presented are not genuine: ““Any man who tries to be good all the time is bound to come to ruin among the great number who are not good. Hence a prince who wants to keep his authority must learn how not to be good, and use that knowledge, or refrain from using it, as necessity requires” (Machiavelli). Machiavelli is revealing to the reader that in order for a prince to do a good job, he must lie to his subjects in order to be successful. He continues to be ironic and poke fun at the system in play and proves that these thoughts of the prince are not genuine. The beliefs that correspond with those of the era that are presented in The Prince are a strong ruling body in order to maintain social order:“Machiavelli, in the world we have described, often holds qualities like liberality, affability, generosity, courage, sincerity, gravity, and faith, to be of no more or less political value than their opposites, except in communication”(Moore).…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli and The Prince Introduction Niccolo Machiavelli is a famous statesman, thinker and one of the founders of modern political science. He was born in the year 1469 at Florence. That is the age of political chaos. The whole country was separated to city governments。In this case, he wrote his masterpiece, The Price, which to be as much praised as blamed. Machiavelli used terse and forceful words elaborate his argument, which had a profound influence in history.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plato’s Republic should be read not as a political treatise, but instead as an extended city-soul analogy which provides an ancillary…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli’s understanding of virtue and effective rule emphasizes the maintenance of political power and the disregard for morality, differing from the ideology of the classic political philosophers. Machiavelli’s concept of virtue is centered around the glorification of a ruler, facilitated by behavioural traits such as bravery, cleverness, deceptiveness, and ruthlessness. Effective rule requires these attributes, as the successful application of these characteristics towards the acquisition and maintenance of power will allow one to become a powerful leader. Machiavelli first explains the foundations of various principalities, such as hereditary and mixed principalities, as the maintenance of power differs…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Much of what is presented in the dialogue has arisen multiple debates among philosophers, psychologists, artists and even the average person. There are a few instances where I agreed with Plato’s beliefs as well as the opposite. One of the clearest concepts of his work is that the rulers of society must have no ulterior motive than to truly help their people and such types of power should not be associated with individual dominance and wealth. Another idea associated with this is that leaders should have true understanding. Though I do not believe all leaders must be philosophers that have attained enlightenment, they must display moral integrity to some extent.…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hans Baron makes and maintains assertions that The Prince and the Discourses are incompatible. He declares that we ought to face the blatant differences between the two texts. Baron questions the different regime types in the rule of tyrants in The Prince and the nascent Roman commonwealth in the Discourses. The mixed-constitution in the Discourses is problematic in synthesizing it with The Prince. In the Discourses, Machiavelli speaks of Aristotle’s constitutional cycle.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays