Just War Tradition Research Paper

Decent Essays
Assess the contemporary coherence of the just war tradition.

Realists describe war as an inevitable outcome of the anarchical international system in which states interact with each other. Based on this premise, throughout the centuries, has been witnessed the flourishing of a tradition of thought focusing on the ethics of war: The Just War Tradition. Its central hypothesis is that the use of force can be morally justified, or in other words that war can be morally right. This view differs from the other traditions of thinking that examine the relation between war and politics such as Pacifism and Realism. Indeed, they respectively claim that war is unjust on its own and that war has nothing to do with morality.
Within the Just War tradition,

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Legalist Paradigm Analysis

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The exception of intervention in other conflicts is categorized into three main subfields. Primarily, war is justified when a set of boundaries contains two or more political communities, one of whom is engaged in the struggle for independence. This is the issue of secession or “national liberation.” Subsequently, the next revision is that of counter-intervention stating when the boundaries have already been crossed by the military force of another foreign power, intervention is justified. The last revision to the Legalist Paradigm deems a just intervention when there are large scale violations of human rights within a set of boundaries.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    King Philips War was the last Native American attempt to push off the invading whites from America. Their efforts were left in vain; however, it did inflate the most destruction on a white population in American history. The Native Americans problems and reasons for getting rid of the colonists were based from the lack of land, since more settlers kept pouring into their region, and competition for resources needed for survival. Nevertheless, the biggest problem, and what I believe became the ultimate reason for the war, was the Puritans earnest attempt to convert Native Americans into Christianity. New England established 14 praying towns where Native Americans could live, but under certain stipulations, they had to become essentially English.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    War and Society, North and South - The War 's Economic Impact: The North - Some commercial ventures fared inadequately. - The loss of southern markets harmed the shoe business in Massachusetts, and a deficiency of crude cotton sent the cotton-material industry into a spiral. - Industries straightforwardly identified with the war exertion profited from colossal government contracts. - Federal government went into the railroad business by building up the United States Military Railroads (USMRR) to convey troops and supplies to the front.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    War. Some consider it as a necessary evil, something that we need but don’t want. Others think of war as horrendous violence and death that is unnecessary. On one hand, war has the ability to erase injustice, end tyranny, and bring freedom and liberty to people’s lives. On the other hand, war is a brutal, violent, and tragic tool, and there is always a different way to settle conflicts, such as negotiation.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And the same God who calls us to nonviolence gives us the power to carry it out.” Wink analysis the Just-War theory, finding loop holes in its logic so that the theory fails, especially if you realize how many millions of innocent civilians are killed in war, regardless of any attempt to “give noncombatants immunity.” In fact, Wink sees Just-War theory as a Christian appropriation of the Myth of Redemptive Violence. At the same time, Wink does not encourage pacifism if that means cowardice and docile submission to the Domination System. Wink reminds us that we must face the fact they the world is hooked on violence.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Agent Orange Vietnam War

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages

    War is a period of time in which lines between right and wrong are blurred. When you’re up against a claimed enemy, the cost of their lives is the price you must pay in order to further your goal. Sometimes we don’t always know what consequences will follow our actions, but in this case, the price of war has followed on throughout generations and generations of people. Leaving a lasting effect on not only the claimed “enemies” but also on them as well.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the essay, three reasons from the Just War Theory will be used to outline the vindication of the war; they are legitimate authority, possessing right intention, and reasonable chance of…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This PowerPoint by Dr. Hinman about “Just War Theory”talks about justifying and creation and creator of real war in the history of Iraq and US government. The topic of Iraq 2003 is provocative because the US and Iraq has their own view about it. I think there are several reasons like oil, nuclear bombs and Iraq is being powerful in front of country like US. One of the big question from the reading was “Can terrorist groups be said to declare war? If not, is the response to terrorism really war?”…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This concept can be split into two main types, Personal/Prophetic Pacifism and Political Pacifism. The former refers, in essence, to a complete intolerance to all forms of killing, while the later discusses opposition to all war (Ryan, 2013). Political pacifism is the more relevant argument, and will therefore be the only one discussed and will from now on be referred to as just ‘pacifism’. Pacifism’s first major stance is that all war is unjust, and in no situation can be fully controlled; war cannot avoid violation of human rights (Ryan, 2013). The second stance is that it does not focus on the practice of violence and killing, but rather the illegitimacy of war making.…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Walzer's Just War Theory

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages

    For a long time, the traditional just war theorists has been challenged by the revisionist’s view of a revised version of just war theory, which the original theory itself was believed to possess flawed ethical arguments; the Walzer’s just war theory of doctrine of military ethics explicitly indicates the independence between the two fundamental principles, the just cause for war (jus ad bellum) and just conduct in war (jus in bello), but the revisionist McMahan believes the moral equality does not apply to both just and unjust combatants equally due to the belief that there is symmetry between the two principles. I argue that the ideas of moral subjectivism could plausibly invalidate Walzer’s traditional view of just war theory, and in addition,…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Just War Theory

    • 2920 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The “Just War Theory” (JWT) is a body of thought that has been constructed over many centuries. The theory is widely contested and has many critics. JWT discusses certain situations and instances in which the use of physical force is “justified” to accomplish desired outcomes. I consider this physical force or aggressive action an act of “war.” In my work, I will discuss how the environment is incorporated into this, and if it plays a factor in justifying “aggressive acts.”…

    • 2920 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even before World War One, the desire to abolish the cycle of war was apparent in civilized society. This was made apparent by William James with his essay “The Moral Equivalent of War”. In his essay, James argues through anecdotes and multiple viewpoints that another method besides warfare should be used to advance civilization. James utilizes perspective throughout his essay to strengthen his argument through an ethos appeal. Throughout his work, he consistently acknowledges two parties: pacifists and advocates of war.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Rationalist Explanations for War,” James Fearon argues that due to war’s costly nature and states’ risk-averse, or at least risk-neutral, tendencies, there should always exist some possible prewar agreement between two disputing states that both parties would prefer to achieve over committing to war. While seeking to reveal his main claim that war is caused by information problems, commitment problems, and issue indivisibilities, Fearon critiques five traditional Neorealist explanations of war: anarchy, positive expected utility, preventive war, lack of information, and miscalculation of relative power. Although Fearon’s critique of the majority of these theories are earnest and do expose multiple logical shortcomings, his rapid dismissal…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From a realist point of view, power is the currency of international politics. This theory states that main actors in the realist’s account are the great powers, who pay careful attention to how much economic and military power they have relative to each other. It stresses that it is important not only to have a substantial amount of power, but also to make sure that no other state sharply shifts the balance of power in its favor. However, realists are hardly the only scholars to apply the concept of the security dilemma. The security dilemma is the essential part of defensive realism because it is the security dilemma that makes possible the cooperation between states.…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Multilateral Negotiations

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages

    For war to occur at least one of the two parties must see a net potential gain from war under certain circumstances and second, there must be a barrier to make negotiation so difficult that a “credible agreement cannot be reached.” Multilateral settings, consisting of three or more states, must try to come to an agreement with the possibility of alleviating a common problem, however, the outcome is not always successful. The outcome depends on the specifications of the negotiation process and many other factors. One solid aspect in the failure of multilateral negotiations is when one state has more information than the others (asymmetric information). Asymmetric information can come in a variety of sources such as the amount of strength a…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays