Just War Theory Analysis

Improved Essays
Show More
There are many different ways war can support or erode our sense of what is ethical. Many people view war as unethical and think it mostly erodes our sense of ethics, like committing war crimes or killing innocent people. On the other hand, many people believe in the “Just War theory”. I believe that as long as people follow the “Just War” theory, war can be ethical and help in achieving our goals as a country.

War crimes include acts that violate the international laws, treaties, customs, and practices governing military conflict between belligerent states or parties (US Army, 2014). Most war crimes fall into one of three categories: crimes against peace, crimes against humanity, and traditional war crimes. Crimes against Peace include the violation of international agreements. Crimes against humanity include the enslavement or persecution of certain persons based on their race, religion, ethnic origin, or some other identifiable characteristic. Lastly, Traditional War Crimes consist of those acts that violate the accepted customs and laws of warfare that have been followed by civilized nations for centuries. War crimes are thought by many to erode our sense of ethics, especially when the individual or individuals are under pressure. …show more content…
There are three part to the “Just War” theory: jus ad bellum (justice in resorting to war), jus in bello (justice in the conduct of the war), and jus post bellum (justice after the war). The rules of jus ad bellum are pointed towards the heads of state, if anything goes or is done wrong, the head of state can be charged with war crimes. The rules of jus in bello involve correct conduct in the midst of battle. Lastly, jus post bellum refers to justice after the war. Many people believe that because of the “Just War” theory and its three parts, war can be ethical and help our country achieve its

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Liam O Flaherty The Sniper Analysis
    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Liam O Flaherty The Sniper Analysis

    War is war, that fact alone will never change. No matter how many people try to sugar coat the word, it always has the same ending. Only one winning side, broken families, broken homes and broken people. It’s become one of the most common subjects in the news and the only subject that is on practically everyone’s mind. With heroes on both sides with one goal it’s just another death game life has set up for us humans.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Anna Quindlen's We Ve Been Here Before
    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Analysis Of Anna Quindlen's We Ve Been Here Before

    War is a two faced devil, it is justified killing that is latter praised in winning. It has reason for being set into motion that may seem to be logical to certain parties, and to others it may seem like an emotional weight pulling them down under the water 's surface of the frontlines. Pulling them down along side those who are backing up the war with one rash reasoning, a group of suits who have made decisions for war and nearly all of them have never stepped a foot onto those frontlines that they are so willing to put men and women on to fight for them. Men and woman who might not all agree with the reasoning behind the fight in the first place, and one war that caught light on not having everyone agreeing, yet still being forced onto the…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Morality In General Eisenhower's 'Message To Invasion Troops'
    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Morality In General Eisenhower's 'Message To Invasion Troops'

    Throughout history there has always been a predicament that led to war. In that case, it is safe to assume that there will always be war, and that war can be morally justifiable. By society's standards "morality" is typically associated with the creation or demand for peace and independence. In order to obtain peace when there is a threat one must defend oneself or attack the oppressor.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    All Quiet On The Western Front
    • 1616 Words
    • 6 Pages

    All Quiet On The Western Front

    “War does not determine who is right- only who is left,” is a quote by Bertrand Russell. This spectrum expresses the casualties of war. In other words, Russell means war is used as an outlet to define a “winner”, or in this case, someone who is right. The veiled truth is that there are no true winners of war when comparing the damage created and the lives lost. Looking at war through that perspective, John F. Kennedy, among others, also agreed.…

    • 1616 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Agent Orange Vietnam War
    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Agent Orange Vietnam War

    War is a period of time in which lines between right and wrong are blurred. When you’re up against a claimed enemy, the cost of their lives is the price you must pay in order to further your goal. Sometimes we don’t always know what consequences will follow our actions, but in this case, the price of war has followed on throughout generations and generations of people. Leaving a lasting effect on not only the claimed “enemies” but also on them as well.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Johnny Got His Gun Essay
    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Johnny Got His Gun Essay

    Although, the purpose of war can be argued, the overall idea is that war can not be justified because it can lead to the overall failure of an individual, affect the relationships…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Just War Theory Of American Sniper
    • 1848 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Just War Theory Of American Sniper

    Within the just war theory there is a type of just war theorist. The traditionalists, who justify the morality on war based on international law. In international law it is not permitted to target civilians. Civilians can also be considered non-combatants. On the other hand, soldiers are permitted to target other soldiers or combatants.…

    • 1848 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Evil And Evil In Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse-Five
    • 2714 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Evil And Evil In Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse-Five

    The murder of civilians is not admissible in any war. Acts of war are cataclysms caused by the distressed egotism of government officials. The absurdity of war is one that that is inadmissible and what war does to humanity transcends our imagination. The novel by Kurt Vonnegut has the predominant themes of how war affects life.…

    • 2714 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments Against Just War Theory
    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Arguments Against Just War Theory

    Just War Theory is something I believe in. However, I believe some modifications may be needed in contemporary America. Snauwaert asserts it is somewhat of a misnomer to suggest the United States is at war with terrorism because terrorism is a tactic . Thus, Snauwaert suggests the United States is at war with the practitioners of terrorism.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bombs: A Historical Analysis
    • 1354 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Atomic Bombs: A Historical Analysis

    It is safe to say that war is the disruption of peace that composes the deliberate destruction of human lives through means of violence. We have been taught the chaos that ensues from war and the change of government and society brought about it through textbooks and lessons in school and even now the United States is at war in the Middle East. We get the gist that it is bad, but it is necessary to defend one 's home and settle escalated disputes as seen in history, but requirements for a just war were established so that some moral standard could be kept and establishments were found Gena in 1929 in Geneva (BBC Ethics). Such a philosophy finds its origins in Christian teachings in St. Thomas Aquinas ' Summa Theologica. It lays out the conditions for a just war and reconciles the wrongs of war; for example, "True religion looks upon as peaceful those wars that are waged not for motives of aggrandizement, or cruelty, but with the object of securing peace, of punishing evil-doers, and of uplifting the good".…

    • 1354 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Athenian Viewpoints Of Pacifism And Just War Theory
    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Athenian Viewpoints Of Pacifism And Just War Theory

    Assess the Athenians’ argument and actions from the standpoint of pacifism and just war theory. Which position do you find most compelling, and why? Just War theory portrays a practical look at the morality of war in comparison to pacifism, allowing the opportunity to form international procedures and protocol in an attempt to control conflict. During The Peloponnesian War the Athenians offered a valid and in-depth argument on their views of justice in war, over time this has developed into many different perspectives on the place of war in international politics, most noticeably pacifism and just war theory.…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Nuremberg Trials
    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Nuremberg Trials

    War is usually associated with pain, loss, and destruction. There is no doubt that the issues World War II brought were devastating for many citizens of the world. However, there are times when the results of war have paved the road for moral beginnings in order to remake society. After World War II, the world was stricken with shock from the atrocious crimes German officials had committed. The Nuremberg Trials changed how war crimes would be approached for decades to come.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Braveheart Argumentative Essay
    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Braveheart Argumentative Essay

    1. I do think that there is such a thing as a just war. However, I also believe that truly just wars are very rare. It is also in many ways a matter of perspective. In many wars both sides believe that they are fighting for the right reason, but in a just war one side has to be more right than the other.…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is War Bad
    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why Is War Bad

    There is no doubt that war is bad. but they are part of our reality. They exist because humans have not been able, after thousands of years of supposed civilization, to agree on basic issues of coexistence. It is the greatest catastrophe that can occur to humans. It brings death and destruction, the slaughter without mercy and carnage, disease and hunger, poverty and ruin in its wake.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    War Is Never Good Essay
    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages

    War Is Never Good Essay

    War is Never Good War is a destruction which can be performed with weapons or without weapons. It is caused by several reasons such as inequality and religion. War has never contributed in creating something; it always advocates disaster. War is itself an evil and is on the top of many kinds of evil like unemployment, illness, poverty, illiteracy and instability. Conflict has never done well to anyone.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings