Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

Improved Essays
What example of dramatic irony appears in the opening lines of this scene? An example of dramatic irony happens in the begining of the scene when Caesar say “what touches us ourselff shall be last served”(III.i.8.). This is dramtically ironic when you thing about how Caesar says the word touched, although he is the one who will be touched by all the conspiritators.

What traits does Caesar show in dealing with those who approach him in this scene? When talking with those who approach him, Caesar shows his love the state over himself. He states that “what touches us ourself shall be served last”(III.i.8.). Normally Caesar comes off as arogant, but him putting Artemidorus last, shows that he values it.

In the exchange between Caesar
…show more content…
This response shows that they fell for Brutus’s form of persuasion, the plebeians want Caesar to rest peacefully. Brutus said similar things in his speech about leaving Ceaser alone. By the plebeian saying this back, it lets Brutus know he was heard.

What actions and tricks of Antony’s particularly impress the mob?
Antony uses several rhetorical devices when trying to persuade the people of Rome, such as anaphora, logos, pathos, and rhetorical questions. The crowd is impressed when Antony shows them that he has “a parchment with the seal of Caesar”(III.ii.130.). The mob becomes depressed when they hear Caesars will. Antony knew that by showing the will, the people the mob would see him as a hero for reading it as they grieve his death.

After reading the two speeches, do you agree with Antony’s statement, “I am no orator as Brutus is,/But (as you know me all) a plain blunt man”? After reading the two speeches I disagree with Antony stating he is “no orator as Brutus is, but a plain blunt man”(III.ii.220). I disagree with Antony portraying himself as a plain blunt man because the way he speaks to the crowd of Rome reveals his manipulative, selfish and conniving ways. He does not want what is best for Rome, but only what is best for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “Brutus is an honorable man.” (Act 3, Scene 2). Mark Antony as well as Brutus both used very convincing techniques to sway in their favor. Mark Antony did have a better way with words, as we would say. He had a more respectable tone as well as diction.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s funeral speech about Caesar in Act Three demonstrates his own use of rhetoric irony with the help of Ethos, Pathos, and Logos. To begin with, the conspirators and people of Rome could have delivered the message that resulted in his speech. Since the conspirators killed Caesar, Antony got the message that he should strike back. In Antony’s speech, his overall motive was pointing out the ambitions of the conspirators, not Caesar, achieving his goal of rousing the plebeians to riot and civil war. His strong use of ethos…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For when the noble Caesar saw him stab, Ingratitude, more strong than traitors arms, Quite vanquished him. Then burst his mighty heart." (III:ii:171-180) He is making the commoners visualize what happened and allowing them to feel the emotional pain Caesar felt when he seen Brutus stab…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s speech ultimately leads to a battle between him and the conspirators. Brutus has good intentions, but nevertheless he makes a lot of bad decisions which eventually leads to his…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Caesar uses this line to convey…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, at the beginning Brutus was able to sway the Roman people to see his side of the story. He included logos and ethos in his argument to make it more effective in gaining the citizens trust. In some aspects the arguments are similar, but one is more effective that the other. Antony's speech is the greater of the two.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Brutus says “not that I loved Caesar less, but that i loved/ Rome more” (III, ii, 23-24), he is using pathos to appeal to the Plebeians through their love and loyalty to Rome, which can make them betray anyone, even Caesar, whom they loved. Brutus also uses rhetorical questions to address the audience including ”Had you rather Caesar were living, and/ die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all/ freemen” (III, ii, 24-26). This rhetorical question is used to make the Plebeians think about what is better for their life by making them choose between being free without Caesar or slaves with Caesar. Lastly, Antony uses verse format in his speech while Brutus uses prose, which make it easier to appeal to the masses by speaking the ordinary form of the…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He does it in a very smart way though while following the rules Brutus has given him. Instead of telling the citizens flat out that they should join his side and that Brutus’ and the rest of the conspirators that killed Caesar were wrong for killing him. He does it using verbal irony. Four different phrases Antony uses in his speech that contain verbal irony will be explained throughout this document.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The “sweet Caesar’s wounds” become personified to “poor dumb mouths” as he shows the crowd the 23 stab wounds. The wounds he believes should speak as though they are a mouth, like the people should feel sorry for Caesar by looking at what happened to him. This conveys both melancholy and manipulation. The stabbing and adding selective words like sweet next to Caesar coincide with the melancholy tone; however he also manipulates them in the same way by making them turn against the Conspirators. At the end of the speech, the rebellion starts against the Conspirators, proving that Antony won Rome over.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Brutus recites a speech in the market place after Caesar’s death the speeches exemplify parallelism, verbal irony, and witty use of rhetoric. With the Roman public watching on eager to see a reprisal for the death of Caesar, Brutus uses the undetected technique of coercion on the Romans taking advantage of their easily susceptible minds. In his speech he proclaims his love for Caesar passionately stating “If there be any in this assembly, any dear friend of Caesar’s, to him I say that Brutus’ love to Caesar was no less than his”. With the public making up their minds, Brutus plays his pathos card, showing he really did care for Caesar but claims, “Have you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” .Here…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Sacrifice

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the first act of the play, Caesar’s interaction with the commoners suggest that although he is not crowned king, he believes he can remain in power over others. An example would be the interaction between the soothsayer and Caesar. Caesar starts with: “What sayst thou to me now? Speak once again.” (Act 1.2,…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In a sarcastic tone, Antony repeatedly referred to these "honourable men". Repeating "Honourable men" is also seen to be ironic, he's ridiculing Brutus and the conspirators saying his idea of Caesar being so ambitious, he's a threat, is something to laugh about. Every time Antony cleverly pauses in his speech to let the plebeians comment, the plebeians are more spiteful toward the conspirators. As the crowd begins to favour Antony the citizens make comments like "Methinks there is much reason in his saying" which shows there change in opinion. Antony said his speech, after Brutus so Antony could adapt to what Brutus has already said and even prove it wrong.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Once they do however, Antony 's speech becomes much more interesting. Each seemingly complimentary statement about Brutus and the others becomes a disguised insult. Every kind word is another jab. This is another tactic used by Antony to dance around Brutus 's demands, and one that works…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays