Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

Improved Essays
Dissonance drives conflict. It is also highlights the opposition of two sides. In Julius Caesar, Shakespeare expertly characterizes Brutus and Antony into foil roles to utilize the advantages of their dissonance. Brutus is easily swayed and relies on logic and values to justify his actions. Antony, on the other hand, utilizes rhetoric and manipulation to guide others to where he would like them to go. The use of Brutus and Antony as foils, specifically in the speech scene, highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each. The situations that highlight the contrasting qualities of Brutus and Antony the most are the funeral speeches each gives after the assassination. The juxtaposition of the two styles amplifies the foil nature of their relationship. Brutus takes a logical, sensible approach to convincing the masses that his actions were justified. His …show more content…
Brutus offers that Caesar possesses the power to enslave all of Rome and has the ambition and power to do so. He directly tells this to his audience of plebeians, letting them know it exactly how it is. His entire argument hinges on the ability of the crowd to see his logic and agree with it. He is unable to realize that some people may have ill intentions, his greatest weakness, and gives Antony the chance to speak. Antony, in a complete inversion, does not let the crowd make their own decision. Through manipulation and cleverly used rhetoric, Antony deftly leads the crowd to the conclusion that the conspirators were wrong in their actions. He uses his strength of subliminally proving his point to capitalize on Brutus’ blind trust. .He also excels in applying the emotional appeals that Brutus neglected. He finishes his eulogy with the line “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, And I must pause till it come back to me. (weeps)”

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Antony, in his eulogy, presented himself as filled with grief and loss; however, a form of subliminal persuasion and manipulation is used to sway the Roman people in his favor. The loyal friend of Caesar appeared to be supportive of the conspirators, but his devotion to the true king never wavered. While he praised the conspirators for being “such honorable men”, Antony admitted how he grieved for his friend. He utilized paralipsis in his cajolery, stating that “I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke, / But here I am to speak what I do know.”…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Effects of Brutus and Antony Brutus Is a noble man Antony repeats with sarcasm during the time that Brutus allowed him for Caesar’s funeral. Brutus was a noble man indeed, though he was corrupted by the conspirators to betray Caesar. Antony can relate with Cassius for being manipulative and weasel like. The contrast between both Brutus and Antony are very distinct and can show how easily someone can be manipulated or how a person can hide their true self.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Brutus's speech he says, "Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?" (III:ii:22-24) Brutus is hitting their emotions by saying that they would be all slaves if Caesar was still alive and ruling over Rome. This was extremely effective because he knows that none of the commoners would want to live their lives as slaves. Antony says in his speech, "Look, in his place ran Cassius' dagger through.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brutus on the other hand, uses only facts which doesn’t give much credibility and there is no bond between him and the crowd. Antony’s precise word choice allows him to even combine pathos and ethos in one phrase. For example, towards the end of the funeral speech, Antony says “But yesterday the word of Caesar might have stood against the world: now he lies there.” Antony appeals to the empathy of the crowd by making them feel sad about his death, especially when he says “now he lies there”. He also shows Caesar was morally good because Caesar was willing to stand against the world just for…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although people generally believe they are persuaded by ideas that they have discovered, William Shakespeare’s historic tragedy, Julius Caesar illustrates that an individual’s thoughts are inevitably shaped by external factors. Persuasion and suggestion are rhetorical skills that play central roles in Julius Caesar, but they also demonstrates how individuals bend towards words they want to hear when faced with a difficult situation. The play cautions the dangers and powers of rhetoric as a tool for manipulation and reminds us how easily and completely an audience can be both won and lost in terms of persuasion. In the few early scenes we are able to see Cassius promoting his own views upon Brutus.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There's many different things that authors incorporate into their writings to make them superior and so they can persuade people easier. In Julius Caesar Shakespeare uses rhetorical situation to help him create masterpieces, he also uses a certain style, appeal and arrangement. In act three Shakespeare has two characters Brutus and Antony include those devices in their speeches to persuade the people to be on their side. Antony has a better argument than Brutus because he uses arrangement, appeal, style, and rhetorical situation much better. Put yourself into the plebeians shoes….…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus Eulogy Analysis

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Shakespeare created Brutus and Cassius as foils, highlighting Cassius’ proclivity for emotions and Brutus’s preference for reason. As revealed in the speech, “[Cassius’] emotions [would] patter on [his] door, but Brutus’/Would…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He convinces the crowd that Caesar was great. The crowd would feel guilty about trusting Brutus, after Antony persuaded them he was almost pathetic, this makes the crowd angry and they rebel. Antony also says "Here was Caesar! When comes such another?" which makes the citizens feel guilty and like they'll never get another Caesar, so they have missed there chance to let Caesar…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Knowing he had to sway the crowd to believe his opinion, Antony had to discreetly show the crowd that conspirators were not heroes, but murderers. Using different forms of persuasion, Antony was able to achieve his goal of turing the sympathy to people now had for Brutus, over the Caesar once again. In order to persuade the people to not have sympathy for the Conspirators, Antony showed them Caesar’s will, repetitively said the word “honorable”, and showed them Caesar’s…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of this writing style, Shakespeare shows the audience internal conflict in his characters. Marcus Brutus was a very hesitant character, he constantly second guessed his decisions and pondered whether they were the correct choice. In the article Brutus’ Personal Failure is the Central Tragedy, the author says, “Brutus is the only one of the conspiritors who is portrayed as inwardly debating the justification for commiting the ‘dreadful thing’”. Almost immediately after the brutal stabbing of Caesar, Brutus doubts his hasty decision. On one hand, the killing of Caesar stopped the tyrannical reign and would hopefully restore freedom to all of Rome.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony manipulates the audience by using this deductive reasoning to prove that it is unjust to murder someone who cares so much about them. Antony starts with a universal truth and backs it up with evidence. He is giving the citizens of Rome further knowledge, so they can make their own decision. From this truth, Antony was able to reach the conclusion that Brutus cannot be labeled as a honest man when he said that Caesar was ambitious and Antony had just proved his point wrong. The audience comes to a realization that they cannot trust Brutus.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whether public speeches result from those such as Adolf Hitler or Martin Luther King, Jr., their remarkable ability to ignite the population persuades people to take up arms regardless of the cause. In the midst of Act III in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony both speak to the bewildered citizenry regarding Caesar’s demise. Resulting from a handful of conspirators assassinating him in the Senate, Caesar’s death sparks chaos which demands explanation. Thus, some individuals assert Brutus’ speech over Antony’s by claiming that Brutus’ effect and ability to direct his point sooner propel him higher than Antony. Unfortunately, this argument fails to acknowledge Antony’s mightier impact on the audience and his employment of a larger…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Brutus addresses the crowd with logic and reason, Antony uses emotion. The use of rhetorical questions, parallel structure, and repetition by Brutus and Antony throughout their speeches changes the views of the crowd and what they should believe. While…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The play “Julius Caesar” explained two men named Brutus and Antony who both presented speeches in front of their town with different meanings about the assassination of Caesar. Antony had to ask Brutus for permission to speak at Caesar’s funeral. His despairing emotion and speech drawed the crowds special attention. Antony speech does not show any praise of caesar but does show sympathy and memorable memories that caesar did for his town. This whole situation sums a complete catastrophe.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays