Julian's Theory Of Evil

Improved Essays
The problem of evil is an atheistic argument, against the existence of God. It is a deductive argument that pits the existence of unjustified evil against the existence of any kind of divine being. Julian of Norwich presents a response to the problem of evil, but there are also some possible holes in Julian’s theory. This paper explores the problem of evil and how it is connected to human suffering, Julian’s theory in response to the problem, and a critique of Julian’s theory.
One must assume that an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent God exists. He is omnipotent because he has complete, unlimited and unmatched power. He is omniscient because he knows and understands everything. He is omnibenevolent because he will always act in moral
…show more content…
Natural evil may also be called unjustified, as it cannot be justified by reason or explanation. The problem of evil is relying on the existence of natural evil. It cannot use metaphysical evil because by definition it depends on God’s existence. The evil exists simply because God exists and is perfect. It cannot use moral evil because this can be explained by the necessary existence of free will. Humans are able to sin because they have free will to obey or disobey God. If God made creatures that automatically loved him, it would not be real love, but a robotic semblance of a relationship. The argument must rely on natural evil because it does appear that these things are caused by man’s choices or God’s power. Once it is assumed that God exists, and proven that natural evil exists, it must be shown that it is impossible for the two to exist in the same universe. If God is omnipotent, or all powerful, he would have the ability to create a world without evil. His omnipotence gives his the ability to create each of the infinite possible universes. Among those infinite possibilities, there would be another infinite number of universes without evil. If God is omniscient, he would fully know and fully understand …show more content…
Julian of Norwich had an encounter with Jesus in a vision, which she writes about in her Revelations of Divine Love. Primarily, Julian discusses that God has purpose in everything and causes everything. She believes that God does all things and God does all things for good. She repeats the phrase, “all shall be well.” Julian believes that sin itself is not a thing and it does not have substance. When people discuss the problem of evil or sin, they are more accurately talking about the pain that sin causes. The pain is the substance that humans can feel, understand and analyze. This helps bridge the connection between the problem of evil and the problem of human suffering. Without that pain, there is no result or consequence from sin. As mentioned earlier, Julian thinks that God has good reason for everything. She concludes that God’s ultimate desire, and why he allows pain and suffering, is so he can comfort his people. Despite the immense difficulty of life on earth, those who believe in the 3-0 God are offered peace and rest for following him. This peace and rest bring comfort and relationship through God from the pain and suffering caused by sin. God’s good purpose for pain, his plan for “all shall be well,” is for his people to come to him for comfort, peace and rest. Julian, in response to the problem of evil,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This comes to the conclusion that if God is omnibenevolent then the natural possibility of evil…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bibl 104 Research Paper

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The purpose of this philosophical research paper is to attempt to develop an understanding on the concept of suffering while investigating the problem of evil from a theological perspective using scriptural references from the Holy Bible. Evil is the Absence of Good The Bible teaches that God is a powerful and almighty God. Many people wonder why there is so much pain, suffering, and corruption in the world if there is a presumably good God overseeing it. According to the Bible, God could not possibly cause evil since he is a righteous God.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article “Evil and Omnipotence,” J.L. Mackie explores the various adequate and fallacious solutions to the “problem of evil,” a problem in which “God is omnipotent; God is wholly good; and yet evil exists” (p. 119). While Mackie discusses, analyzes, and criticizes many solutions, including “good cannot exist without evil” (p. 120) and “evil is necessary as a means to good” (p. 122), my paper will solely focus on Mackie’s response to the fallacious solution that “evil is due to human free will” (p. 123), which begins “first I must query” on p. 124. This paper will formally extract, justify, critically evaluate, and engage with Mackie’s argument that existence of evil due to free will is erroneous. Mackie describes the free will…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Swinburne Vs Adams

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages

    I agree with Marilyn McCord Adams’ assertion that Hell is a bigger problem than evil. For the purposes of this essay, “Hell” will refer to the fire and brimstone or “Traditional Hell” (Adams, p. 276). Adams’ position will be elaborated upon by first discussing the non-fatalistic aspects of the problem of evil. Next, her position will be strengthened by inspecting Richard Swinburne’s theodicies. Lastly, an examination of Adams’ discussion on human agency will support her view that Hell is a bigger problem than evil.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “Roundtable Discussion on the Problem of Evil”, Meghan Sullivan, Trent Dougherty, and Sam Newlands discusses the Problem of Evil for theism, as well as defences theists have come up with against the problem. All three people do not take the side of a theist or an atheist, but instead discuss the problem from a mostly objective view. The Problem of Evil is also discussed by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and William Craig in God? A Debate Between a Christian and an Atheist, where Sinnott-Armstrong argues from the atheist’s point of view and Craig argues from the theist’s. In this paper, I will discuss the points made in both sources to make my argument: I shall argue that there is a possibility that God could have made different types of evils…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the article, “God,” Simon Blackburn gives different insights that may seem logical to a person limited to a self-seeking mindset. Therefore, I will be making the argument that Blackburn is incorrect when claiming that, due to the existence of evil, there must not be an all-powerful God whom doesn’t care. Through his piece “God” Blackburn addresses various different cases through famous philosophers and theologians, namely Anselm, St. Thomas Aquinas, and Cleathnes. He firmly disagrees with these three scholars in their belief of the existence of God.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    S4 explains why God allows moral evils—humans can be bad moral agents. However, S4 does not explain why God allows natural evils—tsunamis produce disasters. S4 fails to explain how natural evils are consistent with the notions of an omnibenevolent and omnipotent God. Mackie offers a dilemma to show S4 is meaningless. The two possibilities are: (i) human character determines free action; or (ii) human character does not determine free action.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Exposition of the Problem of Evil In my paper, I will present the argument Weirob gives on the Problem of Evil, and explain Miller’s response to the Problem of Evil. I will explain why the character of Weirob argues it is impossible for an omniscient, omnipotent, and totally good God to exist simultaneously with evil in the world and go into detail about how Weirob believes that if God has these traits, He should be able to eliminate all evils in the world before they occur. Then I will give Miller’s defense to this argument which includes how God and evil can both exist in the world.…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    My midterm paper will be covering the issues of Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz’s Theodicy and the problem of evil as well as the objections to his argument. In life, I favor optimism over cynicism, but sometimes it can be hard when there are so many horrible things that occur within our world. After reading Leibniz’s theory for the problem of evil and why it occurs, I was moved because he finally put in to words my everlasting faith for the reason God does the things that he does. Leibniz’s theodicy is based on the “best of all possible worlds” argument and his “metaphysical evil” argument. The first argument, which I’ll refer to as worlds, first establishes God’s existence and continues on listing the characteristics of Him.…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction Science is based on the premise that everything originated from something and to believe that this universe occurred by random chance seems illogical. The perplexities and intricacies of nature postulates the idea, or lack thereof, of a higher power. The question of God’s existence is one that has intrigued humanity and countless of philosophers since the beginning of logical thinking. Many philosophers believe that God exists, while others argue and refute His existence. Did the universe really occur by random chance?…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most persistence questions we as thinking having often tends to challenge the existence of God. That question is, ‘if God is good and made us in His likeness, then why is there evil in the world?’ This question has plagued both theist and philosophers alike. I personally have encountered this very question in both Religious Quest, as well as Philosophy. While the latter concentrates on the logical problem of evil in order to argue that there can not be a perfect God who could then allow evil, the theist believes in an omniscient, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent God.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Connection With Evil Essay

    • 3651 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Suffering and its connection with Evil in our world. Thesis: how has humanities understanding of suffering changed over the centuries? I will be exploring how our understandings of evil affects was our knowledge of suffering. My sources will include apostolic letters, academic journals from various university professors.…

    • 3651 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evil exists because we chose it to. We, as free agents can choose between right and wrong. Through this we can justify our actions. What kind of world would we lead if everything was already decided for us and all we would have to do is perform it? God, although knows how we will choose, plays absolutely no role in our process of choosing.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I assert the position that to argue the existence of God, first depends on how much control one is or is not willing to exercise over oneself. The belief in the existence of an omnipotent, supreme being or force, requires one to relinquish some sort of control over one’s own faith and reason in return for the entitlement of certain divine positive rights. For example, the concept of salvation in Christianity requires repentance and faith in the holy trinity. this then, entitles the devotee comfort that they have been spared from eternal damnation. It also provides a comprehensive ethical and moral framework, by which one can model their life from.…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Fifthly, in my point of view I argue that the problem of evil succeed in showing that atheist and theist both have conversing arguments for they positions. Firstly, the problem of evil succeeds in showing the theist view that sometimes seeing is not the only way to know that something exists. For instance, you can know that something exist because of its effects, therefore it is the same in Gods case. Just because we cannot see God or just because we see evil happen around us and he does not do anything about it does not mean he does not…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays