Judicial Branch Vs Executive Branch Essay

The founding fathers cleverly designed the government in way that would prevent the abuse of power, as experienced under British rule. Back before the United States, the colonies had an odd mix of their own local governments, but ultimately subordinates to the British government and controlled by a king. Eventually, they resented the British policies and fought to gain their freedom, resulting in the formation of the United States of America (Peterson, n.d.). This experience made the creators of the Constitution very guarded, so they decided to separate government powers into 3 branches, Legislative, Executive and Judicial.
Congress makes up the Legislative Branch. Within Congress the powers are further separated between the House of Representatives and the Senate. Although Congress was given the power to design laws, the founders purposely made it a difficult process. For example when creating new legislation a proposed bill must be voted on and passed by both the House and Senate and once passed it is subject fate lies with the President. They also have the responsibility to keep check on the Executive branch and Judicial branch. Therefore they have the ability to overturn vetoes, impeach Presidents. The Congress approves Presidential …show more content…
The President is responsible for implementing laws, as well as running the military. The founders gave the President the powerful ability to sign or veto new laws. The veto tool acts as a check to the Legislative Branch. The checks in which the Executive branch has on the Judicial Branch is the President’s ability to appoint judges as well as being able to pardon. Appointing Judges is an important check because the roles outlined within the Constitution for the Vice President are limited. Basically their main purpose is to replace the President in applicable situations and they are the tie breaking vote within the Senate. ("Executive Branch | whitehouse.gov,"