The U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau …show more content…
Definitely. Former CEO John Stumpf and the management team appeared to have only their best interest at heart, not the stakeholders, employees, or the customers. In Stumpf’s testimony at a Banking Committee hearing, he stated he feels accountable, but blamed the employees for “misinterpreting” sales goals (Corkery & Cowley, 2016, para. 36). Wells Fargo has a unique selling technique called cross-selling, which through bundling, allowed employees to fulfill the bank’s vision of saving time and money by bringing their financial services to Wells (Askew, 2016; Farfan, 2016). Moreover, because of Stumpf’s large salary of $22 million per year and included stock options, and the $200 million received because of the scandal, it is obvious his best interest was that of his own (Simon, …show more content…
However, I believe it should be terminated sooner. With John Stumpf announcement of his resignation today, Wells Fargo has to do a lot to rebuild trust in its communities. The sales quotas should be stopped immediately, and the stockholders and board of directors should restructure a compensation plan that is ethical, reasonable and focuses on the customers instead of greed. Transparency is going to be critical especially with new allegations on the rise. The public needs information about the new CEO; his credentials and his plan to reassure the customers and employees that this unethical practice will not be tolerated henceforth. Finally, Wells Fargo should provide customers with something such as free credit monitoring for a year for all customers affected by the scandal. By promoting some form of social responsibility, may help rebuild customers’ confidence in the