John Stuart Mill Essay

John Stuart Mill’s advocates and supports that Utilitarianism is in fact a moral theory under what he calls the Greatest Happiness Principle. The term “utility,” in Mill’s opinion can be described in the Greatest Happiness principle. In the Greatest Happiness Principle, Mill’s elucidate that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill). His argument under this principle was that the equality of pleasure comes from an individual’s higher faculties. Thus, through happiness one is able to express higher faculties. The end of his argument ends with things that people should count towards their happiness. In addition, Mills also seeks to explain the stratifications of the different types of pleasure. I believe that we should embrace utilitarianism as a moral theory and furthermore as an ethic. However, I believe that Mill’s principle creates a moral problem. According to the Greatest Happiness Principle, actions are right in order to promote individual happiness. However, I do not fully agree with this part of the principle because there is a slight chance that an individual’s actions can promote unhappiness, in response …show more content…
One should not yearn to be a happy pig over being an unhappy human because the individual that is best capable to critic others pleasure eminence must have experienced the higher and the lower faculties. I agree with Mill’s conclusion on this part of the principle because an individual is able to compare satisfaction with happiness and pleasure. I assume the statement also implies that the more aware an individual is of their various choices, the more satisfaction they can receive. Furthermore, one should never desire a lower existence, but rather exercise one’s higher faculties and maintain