John Stuart Mill And The Proliferation Of Print

Improved Essays
With the proliferation of print emerging in the 18th century, there is an anxiety that crops up concerning the fabrication of literature. Literature has taken on a symbolic feature, that within commercial society, books are regarded as material possessions meant to demonstrate wealth and social status. And thus while there is indeed concern in regards to how literature fits into this commercial society; the quantity of print is a problem, for with the saturation of print comes this compulsion to become an author, to write and become published. However, if everyone is to become an author and writer, then there will be no one to read the works that are being published. Vicemius Knox is concerned with how literature fits in with commercial life, for the sole purpose is not to spend one’s entire life reading. The problem that arises, however, …show more content…
While Knox is concerned about what people are reading, J.S. Mill is concerned about who the readers are. His main argument with the proliferation of print is that it breaks down class distinctions, that literature once available to only a small elite group, is now available to a reading public who seek pleasure rather than knowledge. Considerable emphasis has therefore not only been placed on the proliferation of print, but also on the proliferation of audiences for print and the emergence of a mass reading public. Through a comparison of excerpts from Knox’s Essay and J.S. Mills The Present State of Literature, this essay will demonstrate that the concerns about the proliferation of print and the proliferation of the reading public are two distinct arguments; Knox is concerned with literature within a commercial society and the types of reading that people should be reading, while J.S. Mill is concerned with an uneducated public seeking pleasure through

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    There has been a long tradition in manuscript and print culture, and that tradition is associated with the act of writing, transferring the product of the human intellect and imagination on a tangible that will carry it to distant places and distant times. The book as we know it extends past the life of its author the life of its language, it was written, and the style of art of its content. An Analyses of Greenblatt’s the swerve argues that the defiance of religion is what leads to the change from manuscript culture to print culture. The printing press allowed for the world to develop from manuscript culture to print culture but this change would have happened regardless of the technological advances due to the protestant reformation.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Moral Influence of Literature In an immoral society where technology hypnotizes the people, books are illegal and philosophical thinking is frowned upon; individualism no longer exists, people claim to be happy but feel little emotion, and mistakes are never learned from. However, corruption and immorality remains the result when the obsession of literature and philosophy influence a man’s lifestyle. Philosophy and literature should be learned from, but with reason, adapted into our lives. Through the use of allusions,paradoxes, and motifs, The Picture Of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde and Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury emphasize the statement.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mill’s On Liberty and Marx’s The Communist Manifesto are both political works about how they believe the government should be run in which they both believe that the people should not be oppressed by the government or other people. However, both differ in their opinions of what type of form a government should be; Mill believes that the government should take on the form of liberalism where it plays a limited role on society that emphasizes on individual freedom and freedom from tyranny of the majority. Marx on the other hand, believes that communism is an ideal form for a government where it will emphasize equality for the people that will eliminate exploitation among one group of people over another. While Mill believes human nature is detached…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Literature unites everything that I find exhilarating about life, most of my free time is 2 taken up with reading and creating my own stories which I share with friends and family. To 3 me, Literature and the written word are humankind's greatest accomplishment, which is why I am 4 determined to devote my life to its study. I am not content with simply reading a text, as I 5 have a hunger to learn everything I can about what I read - how it was written; why it was 6 written; what is its place in Literature as a whole. 7 In the words of Jane Yolen, "Literature is a textually transmitted disease, normally 8 contracted in childhood.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill, a philosopher during the mid-1800’s, is known as one of the most important western political philosophers in the past three hundred years. Many of his arguments on freedom can be seen intertwined with the current way we run societies around the world today. Being a self proclaimed Utilitarian, Mill focuses his arguments on making the collective reside with the most utility possible, with utility being defined by happiness. To achieve maximum utility, Mill presents three larger arguments,the harm principle, experiments of living, and freedom of speech. Before one can begin to agree or criticize Mill's arguments they must first delve into the core of Mill’s teachings, the harm principle.…

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill sets up his argument by giving his somewhat of a thesis about how society when it does interfere it is in the wrong time or place. He talks about how people all over use this moral code unjustly against things they do not like. Also that people have this ideal where the public gives freedom and choice in all uncertain matters and only involves itself when it is universally wrong. He argues that no society is like that but acts like it does in the view of others. Mill gives examples such as most Muslims do not eat pork inside their country, or in Spain where they punish married clergy.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cristian Saldana 9/24/14 Political Theory This essay considers the extent to which the U.S. should be tolerant of what can be considered damaging images, speech or actions. For example, I can choose to either live a life of good contribution to the country or no contribution in terms of productivity, development and research. Thus concludes my question if liberty, freedom and democracy improve whether or not somebody does or does not contribute.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The front of the book is extraordinary with its red foundation and yellow written work. Both the front and the back of the book are the same with no other composition yet the title and the writer 's name. There is no depiction of the book or any surveys on the spread. Nothing emerges to snatch the peruser 's consideration, yet this book is a standout amongst the most broadly read books of the twentieth century. Catcher…

    • 2023 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Literature is an inexhaustible source of beauty. People living in the 21st century often turn to the great works of the 19th century. Someone finds solace in books, other people find the support and confidence, and the rest of them find food for thought. But the literature has always attracted people of all ages, professions, and interests. Every literary work is not just simple story created by the author.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper will evaluate the practicable merits of arguments made by John Stuart Mill in and Immanuel Kant regarding motivation and consequences in determining morality. Mill bases his argument on Utilitarianism which seeks to maximize the total amount of happiness and minimize the amount of pain and suffering. Mill removes focus from the motivation and places higher importance on the consequence/result of an action to determine one’s morality. Kant emphasizes the importance of motivation as morality is concerned and dwindles the importance of consequences. This paper will conclude that Kant’s argument is more practicable because it does not hold the individual responsible for circumstances out of their control and places value in motivation,…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our society faces a lot of challenges despite living in such a liberal world. We like to limit the activities we are not okay with or don’t understand so in terms we label them as wrong or even outlaw them. We don’t like to experiment new ways of life because we are often times too comfortable living in our own shell of what is good and what is not that anything outside of it is considered to be erroneous. John Stuart Mill stresses on the issue of conscience and individuality. Mill’s theory is that society should be free of any constrains, we should allow different opinions and experiments of living in order for man to be true to his nature.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill argues that when he is focused on a goal other than his own happiness, such as to other people’s happiness, on improving mankind, on pursuit of art, or other pursuit, then he finds happiness along the way. He feels that enjoyments in life become pleasant when they are enjoyed in passing and not made a principal pursuit. If you have pursuing happiness your main goal, Mill theorizes that your happiness is not achieved, but instead it becomes inadequate. Thus, Mill contends that you should not treat your happiness as your purpose of life. Treat a goal outside of happiness as your purpose of life.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    How important is freedom of thought? Benjamin Franklin is quoted as saying, "Without freedom of thought there can be no such thing as wisdom & no such thing as publick liberty without freedom of speech. " Freedom of thought is defined as the freedom of an individual to hold or consider a fact, viewpoint, or thought, independent of others' viewpoints1. In Chapter 2 of John Stuart Mill’s On Liberty, Mill addresses the issue of whether people should be allowed to limit, or eliminate, anyone’s thoughts or opinions.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Welfarism The word ‘welfarism’ as a midway between capitalism and socialism is said to have been “coined by the British economist John Hicks, and introduced into contemporary debate about social justice by Amartya Sen; and connotes that the distribution of economic goods is evaluated by the effect it has on the welfare of the persons concerned” (Web 29/03/2017). In a similar way, Omoregbe in his book, Social – Political Philosophy, states that “welfarism as a ‘midway’ between capitalism and socialism is an ideology which allows private enterprises on one hand, but takes a substantial part of the profit through taxation by the State on the other hand, and used it to provide basic amenities for the common good” (10). Without undermining the provision…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many more people were learning how to read and those whom already knew how to do it were improving their skills. “As the print culture expanded, reliance on memory and recitation diminished. The very way people thought and learned and remembered was changing” (Kidner, 353) all these changes would make people’s lives better. People were exploring other ideas and topics, they were getting more knowledge; therefore, many people were becoming more cultured in this time in history. The printing press allowed economy to increase by using paper, and producing millions of books, but not only the profitable part was beneting this period, the culture and education side was also improving since more people were becoming more educated by learning and studying about important subjects that were not taught…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays