John Ross Indian Removal Act

Improved Essays
The Removal Act of 1830 was signed by seventh President of the U.S., Andrew Jackson. This act allowed the President to explore unsettled lands pushing the Indians west. The act was not in specific removal of Indian tribes, but in order to acquire their land with treaties. Andrew Jackson professed the Indian Removal Act would be best for the tribes to get away from the whites and it gave them their chance to escape U.S. power. In Jackson's eyes, removing the Indians will also grant them a happiness that they find on their journey. In Jackson's speech to congress he states, ¨It will separate the Indians from immediate contact with settlements of whites; free them from the power of the States; enable them to pursue happiness in their own way and under their own rude institutions.¨ One of Jackson's other main concerns for the Indians was their deteriorating population in an area on the ring of fire of whitemen, he says ¨... progress of decay, which is lessening their numbers, and perhaps cause them gradually, under the protection of the Government and …show more content…
Federal Troops were sent to Georgia to harass the Cherokee tribe and push them across the Mississippi. John Ross’ document explains why the removal would be cruel and unjust. As John Ross stated, ¨We wish to remain on the land of our fathers. We have a perfect and original right to remain without interruption or molestation.¨ One of the biggest problems with moving west is the homeland. Native American tribes are well known for worshiping their ground. Land to them is a sacred possession that their ancestors gave to them. Ross says ¨... still it is not the land of our birth, nor of our affections. It contains neither the scenes of our childhood, nor the graves of our fathers. . . .¨ Ross spoke for many tribes when he spoke out. The Indians had zero interest whatsoever in migrating west and were genuinely scared of what could be out

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Jackson accepted the help of friendly native Americans and the Cherokee Regiment which included John Ross, “…and from the moment he enrolled, his destiny and Jackson’s were linked”, (Inskeep, 5). Jackson and Ross’s relationship evolved with many disagreements of their actions. Especially when Andrew Jackson and John Ross would start as friends and partners during the beginning of their alliance but Andrew ended up betraying Ross in the end due to his presidency power and his desperation to grow and expand the United Sates. Ross disagreed with Jackson throughout the years of the removal debate, the Trail of Tears trek from the Cherokee Homelands, and the rebuilding of the nation. Andrew Jackson left a big imprint upon America, he is best known for being the author of the Indian Removal act of 1830.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Indian removal movement of 1830 started because Americans were moving west and acquiring land to settle, but the Indians became the obstacle. Another factor that made the Americans to remove the Cherokees was, because of the gold that Georgians had found in Cherokee’s land. The government would make treaties, but the government would not fully follow the treaties. While the Americans moved west, they introduced diseases, but this was not enough to wipe out the tribes, war was the answer. It was not until Congress passed the Indian Removal Act of 1830 that it allowed to move Indians further west that became a real problem for the tribes.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Cherokee Removal

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Monetary awards were given to guides and supporters of the removal plan. Indians who resisted migration west were put into stockades for long periods of time, until the arrangement for removal began. “They are prisoners, without a crime to justify the fact”.5 Voices of Andrew Jackson, John Ridge, Lewis Cass, the Cherokee women, Evan Jones, Elias Boudinot and many more could not change the course of events happening to the Cherokee nation. The complexity of this time in history raises many concerns for the survival of the Native Americans. The authors posed many questions as to the actions and decisions of the Cherokees.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jackson Removal Thesis

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Jackson defended his stand by asserting that removal was the only course of action that could save the Native Americans from extinction. Jackson's attitude toward Native Americans was patronizing, describing them as children in need of guidance and believed the removal policy was beneficial to them. To congressional leaders, he assured them that his policies would enable the federal government to place the Indians in a region where they would be free of white encroachment and jurisdictional disputes between the states and the federal government. He asked congressional approval of his removal policy. Some of the people that were sitting in the government didn’t like the idea of Jackson and didn’t want to move the tribes from their lands, by…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A cherokee Indian from the “Memorial of the Cherokee Nation,” describes the western land as badly supplied with food and water, unfamiliar cultures, and “wish to die” on this soil (Doc. K). Jackson forced the Indians to surrender their land and failed to provide any support in terms of food and other necessities for their westward migration. Because of the Indian’s utmost disenchantment, it is possible that they took their case to the Supreme Court. However, Jackson could have ignored that decision since he already had a majority vote in Congress to be condemned and impeached. Conjointly, Native Americans were gathered into similar places in the west.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Monroe Doctrine Questions

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A.1. Faction- is a group within a larger party with a common political purpose. Ex. Discord between the military faction and the people caused an uprising.…

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A vision of wealth, power and religion was to be the driving force of Americans that would eventually lead to the Indian Removal Act of 1830. The Cherokee Nation would be under constant threat. Keeping a wary eye of any encroachment by their near neighbors; The Shawnees, The Creeks, The Choctaws and Chickasaws and now a new force, The…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Manifest Destiny Manifest Destiny was where Americans/whites thought that God wanted them to move west to the Pacific Ocean. It was their destiny to take all that land west. O’Sullivan said that “Manifest Destiny is going to happen so it might as well happen now it’s our destiny we can't change that”(History.com). Americans said anything in there way will be removed. Manifest Destiny affected minority populations in the United States because of the Indian Removal Act, Mexican-American War, and the Dawes Act.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Andrew Jackson, the current 17th president of the United States, has passed a bill that will ruin thousands of lives and families. The Indian Removal Act is in place and is causing any Indians east of the Mississippi to move west. Many are already calling it the Trail of Tears because of the deaths already. We need to stop this from happening again. Jackson has always been into “indian removal” and has even pushed the Seminole Indians out of Florida recently.…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cherokee people lived all over the land before the United States even existed. “The Cherokees lived on land extending from North Carolina to South Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, and Alabama for hundreds of years” (Green & Perdue, 1). They were constantly moving around involuntarily. The Cherokee tribes were often forced to leave their land when Americans found use of the land that the Cherokees were living on. White Americans were wanting their land because they found gold, wanted their livestock and they were able to evict the Cherokees out of their homes” (Green & Perdue, 92)…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Indian Removal Act, which was passed by Congress in 1830, completely changed the path for the future in multiple aspects. In determining what impact this event still has on our country today, one must start by analyzing the relationships between Native Americans, the United States government, and the common white settler. Additionally, one must analyze how the removal of these tribes affected not only them, but the white settlers. Socially, Native Americans were viewed as no more than objects in the way of what the Americans viewed as rightfully theirs.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people were caught up on the Indian Removal Act, mainly the Trail of Tears. In Feller’s article, he does mention it and says it actually happened during Martin Van Buren’s presidency even though Jackson’s law led to it (Feller). The Indian Removal Act allowed the president to negotiate with the southern tribes, asking for their land in exchange for them to move west of the Mississippi River (Wikipedia). Supposedly, it was voluntary; although, in a roundabout way, the Indians would want to if they wanted to survive.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The natives land was constantly being settled on, their livestock stolen, even their villages burned to the ground by the European American Settlers. By signing with the Indian Removal Act, the indigenous peoples were given an opportunity to get away from the violence and discrimination of the settlers. The Indian Removal Act gave the Native Americans a means of survival, thus benefitting the Native Americans and saving many lives that may have been lost on both the European American and the Native American sides had the Native Americans remained on their homeland.            The Native American Tribes were offered land west of the Mississippi River that they would have total sovereignty over. President Andrew Jackson was given the legal right by the Indian Removal Policy to grant the land west of the Mississippi River to the Native Americans for them alone to govern over to the tribes that did agree to give up their ancestral homelands. Most of the European American population believed that America would never expand beyond the Mississippi River, so the Native American Tribes would be safe from the settlers heading west to create their homes on the new…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert V Remini Summary

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Remini says Jackson felt that the only solution for both the Unites States and the Native tribes was that they had to be removed. This attitude towards the Indians followed him into the White house when he was elected President in 1828. Of all the things Jackson accomplished during his presidency, his Indian Removal Act was most important. Jackson finally accomplished his long thought solution to the Indian problem. Today’s historians see this a cruel act against his seemingly long term enemy.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On May 28, 1830, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act. The law authorized Andrew Jackson to negotiate with Indians for their removal to federal land west of the Mississippi River in exchange for their homelands. Andrew Jackson was able to convince the American people that Indians could not coexist peacefully with them. He argued that the Indians were uncivilized and needed to be guarded from their own savage ways. As a result of his actions, thousands of Indians were forcibly ripped from their homes and onto a journey to a unknown territory, that was not as fertile as their home grounds.…

    • 2378 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays