John Rawls Social Justice Summary

Improved Essays
John Rawls was dissatisfied with traditional philosophers. He wanted to create a theory based around the concept of social justice. Rawls starts by explaining to him what social justice is. After his explanation, we will go into how today’s American society has become injustice in the form of our healthcare system. In the end we will go through any objections that may come from changes within the health care system, and if these have answers to themselves.
Rawls believe that justice is an indeterminable right. In his book, The Theory of Justice, Rawls go into depth around what justice truly is. To him, it is determined to be a “system of thought” (Rawls, 1971). Society is structured around fundamental rights and duties, as well as the advantages of society based around social institutions. The veil of ignorance ensures “no one is
…show more content…
In today’s America, this is not true within the healthcare system we have in place; especially regarding race. This can be seen in many forms. The simplest way is those of minority races, Hispanic and Black, have a drastic change of life expectancy compared to their white counterparts. Black men have a 5-year difference compared to white men (Das and Gaffney, 2015). The healthcare system creates injustice for those on a lower economic status. Many on Medicaid and Medicare, are turned away by specialists, surgeons, and even for necessary medications (Das and Gaffney, 2015). To Rawls, this is a large unjust. People are socially stigmatized by their race and economic status in life threatening ways. Rawls believed “the distribution of wealth and income, and the hierarchies of authority, must be consistent with both the liberties of equal citizenship and equality of opportunities” (Rawls, 1971). The goal of justice is to distribute goods equally, which is not happening when simple things such as medication are

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Now that the objection of self-interest has been refuted, the emphasis needs to shift towards an explanation of Rawls second principle of justice. The second principle, commonly referred to as the “Difference Principle,” indicates that, “[S]ocial and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both (a) reasonably expected to be to everyone’s advantage, and (b) attached to positions and offices open to all.” Rawls specifies that the “Liberty Principle” is “lexicographical”. This means that the principles are hierarchically ordered where the first principle must be satisfied before the second can even be considered.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Before Rawls’s conception of justice and the difference principle, the utilitarian principle was often used in politics justifying inequalities if they made all of us better off. Rawls twist on this is that it is not enough that it should make all of us better off it must make the worst off as well off as possible. Rawls believed in justice…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wage Gap Research Paper

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Pages

    However, not only is the wage gap the issue within societies, but also the prevalent problem of race. One does not even have to wander far from first-world countries to witness the injustices in regards to the wellness of the community in terms of health. They can be found right here in the Land of the Free, the United States of America. Where the very fundamental principle of a country is equality including equal opportunities, the United States does not extend its caring arms far enough for the impoverished when their health is on the line. With 88% of white Americans being under the umbrella of health care, minorities including Hispanics, African-Americans, Asians, and Native Americans’ percentages range from 68% to 82% (Fact Sheet: Health…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Low income individuals and people of color face increased barriers to access in care, receive poor quality care and experience worse health outcomes. Health inequalities represent the accumulative effect of these factors, they are usually passed on from one generation to the next (Rull,…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am here to discuss the reasons why the individual would choose to pick life without possibility of parole in the case of a robber killing a store owner and being charged with 2nd degree murder. With the case of the individual jury person one of the things about him is that one of his children is in law enforcement, this little amount of evidence shows why he would choose life without parole is because he respects the law and the punishment of the judicial system, defendant shown as a threat to society and he had a weapon. After the veil of ignorance the position is still the same because we believe that the defendant will be a danger to society and needs to be locked up from the public.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rawls’ “Theory of Justice” was one of the first formulations of this type of reflective equilibrium as he proposed that individuals under the “original position” would construct their version of justice through WRE. Under the “original position”, individuals weigh their moral judgements and considerations in an effort to choose among competing principles and construct a feasible conception of justice for which people could easily…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So, the first principle of Rawls - is essentially the principle of freedom. Basic freedoms are 1) political freedom (the principle of "equal participation" in the political process defined by the constitution), 2) the rule of law, or legal state 3) freedom of conscience. The second principle of justice of Rawls is formulated as follows that social and economic inequalities are to be settled in such a way as to lead to the greatest benefit of the least successful and that positions in society has to be open to all, with the subject of compliance with fair equal opportunity. Principles of justice Rawls relies on a strategy known in game theory as a "maximin" and implies the maximization of the minimum result. Thus, according to Rawls, the person in the original position inevitably chooses a society in which the least successful will be in the best possible position.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Distributive justice is concerned with fair distribution of resources amongst the general population. When distributing resources they have to take into account the total amount of resources available, and how to distribute it. This is where social justice gets lost. Social justice implies that every individual should get the same treatment no matter economic status. Nurses often face ethical issues that may affect the patient as well as the nurse.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due to racial and ethnic inequality in health care, such as easy access to health insurance and medical doctors, African Americans in the United States are at a higher risk than whites when it comes to diseases. For instance, African Americans are more likely to die of heart disease, stroke, prostate, and breast cancer, then whites and African Americans children are more than twice as likely to be hospitalized for asthma, than white children. (Rosenblum & Travis, 2016, p. 304) This disparity could be contributed to many factors, such as the reduction of spending on public hospitals and other basic services, as well as income gaps and social status between rich and poor. The income gap and differences in status as affected the lack of easy access to health insurance and medical doctors, which as contributed to aversive racism, in the manner of unconscious biases regarding racial and ethnic minority groups.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    According to the US Department of Health and Human Services (2011), “The Economic Burden of Health Inequalities in the United States, by the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, concludes that “the combined costs of health inequalities and premature death in the United States were $1.24 trillion” between 2003 and 2006” (page, 2). Health disparity is not an issue that only affects the uninsured or the under insured. This is an issue that affects the entire American population because the burdens of healthcare inefficiencies and poor health outcomes are ultimately bore by the American people via increase taxes and higher insurance premiums. “Racial/ethnic minority Americans have lower rates of health insurance than whites largely because they are less likely to have employer-sponsored coverage” (Hoffman & Lillie-Blanton, 2005, page,…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Conception Of Unequal

    • 231 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Rawls theory of “general conception of justice” is that all primary social goods are to be distributed equally unless an unequal distribution is to the benefit of everyone. Because of the fact that each person would wish to advance their own conception of primary goods, in the original position they don’t know what these are, each person would find it rational to maximize his share of primary goods and would find it reasonable to not ask for more or feel like are they settling for less than any other person an expect for others to be just as equal as them. So the over all idea is the equal shares between everyone. Likewise, with the “special conception” Rawls brings into the argument the “difference principle”. This principle brings in the…

    • 231 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    New Question 1: Rawls and Feminism Should we be caring for the ones who are most venerable or the poor? Philosopher John Rawls, believes that we should be thinking about the poor first before we make any policies, he attempts to account for social justice. “The natural distribution is neither just nor unjust; nor is it unjust that persons are born into society at some particular position. These are simply natural facts.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Using the first principle of justice, the laws that are based off the “general will” will always promote the security and freedom of individuals intact. Due to the emphasis on promoting freedom and equality, the ideal society would fall under Rawls’ determination of fairness under the first principle of justice. Rawls puts an emphasis on equal liberties and Rousseau’s society is focused on equality of all individuals. In that society, individuals have social liberties similar to those Rawls emphasizes. “The social compact creates an equality among the citizens so that they all commit to the same conditions and should all have the same rights.”…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Rawls Thought Model

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this essay, I will detail the thought experiment of John Rawls known as “the original position,” the two principles of justice he believes this thought experiment results in, and, lastly, consider one objection to his claims. I argue that Rawls’ thought experiment offers a decent starting point to consider matters of justice and/or good and bad in society, but becomes compromised when we are asked to presume members behind the “veil of ignorance” do not know their conceptions of good. In A Theory of Justice, John Rawls considers the role of justice in society and posits a simple conception of just society. In Rawls’ view, justice depends upon a “scheme of cooperation” that enables all in society to achieve an agreeable existence, or the…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The original position plays an important role to lead Rawls’s two principles of justice: first, each person has a claim to a fully adequate scheme of equal basic liberties, compatible with the same scheme of liberties for all (JF, 13), and second, they are to be attached to offices and positions open to all under conditions of fair equality opportunity, furthermore, they are to be to the greatest benefit of the least-advantaged members of society. (JF, 13) Moreover, Rawls asserts the priority of his first principle exceeds his second principle. He, therefore, emphasizes his first principle in the Theory of Justice. Why is his first principle important?…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays