In succeeding chapters, Gaddis goes more into depth about the evolution of social sciences. In chapter two, he discusses the relevance of time and space. Gaddis makes many connections to geography and the patterns that we see extend throughout eras. He explains a lot about the historical method and why it’s engaged into many historical theories and concepts. He claims; “The answer isn’t as flaky as you might think, because when it comes to the dimensions of time and space with which historians have to deal, it really is tortoises all the way down: time and space are infinitely divisible. We’ve agreed, as a matter of convenience, to measure time by a series of arbitrary units called centuries, decades, years, months, days, minutes, and seconds – historians don’t normally go beyond these” (Gaddis 27). It’s interesting to note that Gaddis focuses on the scientific ideologies and argues how historians need multiply causes for one big issue. In the next few chapters, Gaddis brings about the topic of the interdependency …show more content…
I think it’s engaging how he engages his arguments about social sciences, mathematical ideologies, and correlates them back to history. He introduces the idea of reductionism. Reductionism is the belief that you can piece together reality through variables and mathematically it’s basically like solving an equation. Gaddis states; “Nevertheless, reductionism remains the dominant mode of inquiry within the social sciences: historians are still the principal practitioners of an ecological approach to the study of human affairs. To see why, it’s worth exploring in greater detail the relationship between explanation and generalization as historians and social scientists have traditionally understood it” (Gaddis 62). Gaddis argues that historians are developed to accept tendencies and patterns. I agree when he claims that historians believe in contingent, not categorical, causation and trace processes from a knowledge of outcomes. Similar to political scientists, they need certain tools and techniques to establish conclusions on many