The conflict between the Christians and the Jesus Seminar has been an ongoing struggle since 1985. The Jesus Seminar, founded by Robert Funk, originated in 1985 as around 70 biblical scholars set out to determine the legitimacy of Jesus’ sayings (Dart). The Seminar focused on the historicity of Jesus using the best methods of science and literary criticism as it pertains to the Bible. Funk believed that the gospel writers had made Jesus into a “larger than life” figure in order to satisfy their religious desires. The Jesus Seminar’s goal is to rid the historical figure of Jesus from “Christian legend and myth” and to find out who Jesus really was and what he really said (Craig). The Seminar believed that Jesus was a mortal who was born naturally
…show more content…
As a result of the historicity of Jesus, his performing of miracles, and his resurrection, which are explained by the gospel writers and outside, non-Christian sources, The Gospels have been proven reliable and the claims of the Jesus Seminar stand invalid.
The Jesus Seminar utilized very meticulous methods in determining the authenticity of the Gospels. In 1993, the Seminar published their first claims, known as “Seven Pillars of Scholarly Wisdom,” in The Five Gospels: The Search for the Authentic Words of Jesus. The first pillar is identifying the historicity of Jesus. It looks at Jesus as a historical figure as well as how the gospel writers look at him. The second pillar focuses on the Synoptic Problem, focusing on the differences between Jesus in the Synoptics and Jesus in the Gospel of John. The third pillar identifies Mark as the first written gospel and thus Matthew and Luke used Mark as a source. This is known as Markan priority. The fourth pillar looks at the highly debated Q document, which allegedly houses many of the sayings of Jesus. The Seminar identifies Q as “hypothetical.” The fifth pillar doubts Jesus as an apocalyptic figure. The sixth pillar takes a look at the methods of journalism during Jesus’ ministry. Lastly, the seventh pillar examines the amount of …show more content…
This writing examined the historical figure of Jesus. In it, the Seminar published the following conclusions: Jesus was born in Nazareth, while King Herod was in power. Jesus’ mother was named Mary. However, the Seminar questioned the identity of Jesus’ father. Jesus spent his time indulging in meals with social outcasts. Jesus used unconventional psychological methods to perform certain healings, without the use of medicine. The Seminar concluded that Jesus did not perform miracles, such as the feeding of the 5000, walking on water, or raising people from the dead. They claimed that Jesus was arrested in Jerusalem then crucified by the Romans. Another conclusion was that Jesus was killed for being a public distraction, not for his blasphemous statements. Jesus’ body did not rise from the dead and Paul, Peter, and Mary Magdalene, who were likely hallucinating during this traumatic period of their lives, falsely documented his resurrection (Funk). Contrary to the Jesus Seminar, the gospel writers and church members believe that Jesus was born in Bethlehem, in a supernatural birth to Mary and Joseph. The gospel writers agree that Jesus spent time with social outcasts, however the
As a result of the historicity of Jesus, his performing of miracles, and his resurrection, which are explained by the gospel writers and outside, non-Christian sources, The Gospels have been proven reliable and the claims of the Jesus Seminar stand invalid.
The Jesus Seminar utilized very meticulous methods in determining the authenticity of the Gospels. In 1993, the Seminar published their first claims, known as “Seven Pillars of Scholarly Wisdom,” in The Five Gospels: The Search for the Authentic Words of Jesus. The first pillar is identifying the historicity of Jesus. It looks at Jesus as a historical figure as well as how the gospel writers look at him. The second pillar focuses on the Synoptic Problem, focusing on the differences between Jesus in the Synoptics and Jesus in the Gospel of John. The third pillar identifies Mark as the first written gospel and thus Matthew and Luke used Mark as a source. This is known as Markan priority. The fourth pillar looks at the highly debated Q document, which allegedly houses many of the sayings of Jesus. The Seminar identifies Q as “hypothetical.” The fifth pillar doubts Jesus as an apocalyptic figure. The sixth pillar takes a look at the methods of journalism during Jesus’ ministry. Lastly, the seventh pillar examines the amount of …show more content…
This writing examined the historical figure of Jesus. In it, the Seminar published the following conclusions: Jesus was born in Nazareth, while King Herod was in power. Jesus’ mother was named Mary. However, the Seminar questioned the identity of Jesus’ father. Jesus spent his time indulging in meals with social outcasts. Jesus used unconventional psychological methods to perform certain healings, without the use of medicine. The Seminar concluded that Jesus did not perform miracles, such as the feeding of the 5000, walking on water, or raising people from the dead. They claimed that Jesus was arrested in Jerusalem then crucified by the Romans. Another conclusion was that Jesus was killed for being a public distraction, not for his blasphemous statements. Jesus’ body did not rise from the dead and Paul, Peter, and Mary Magdalene, who were likely hallucinating during this traumatic period of their lives, falsely documented his resurrection (Funk). Contrary to the Jesus Seminar, the gospel writers and church members believe that Jesus was born in Bethlehem, in a supernatural birth to Mary and Joseph. The gospel writers agree that Jesus spent time with social outcasts, however the