Jenner's Epileptic Seizure

Improved Essays
Jenner (Defendant) experienced an epileptic seizure while operating his vehicle that crashed into Maxine Hammontree (Plaintiffs) bicycle store causing her personal injuries and property damage to the shop owned by her. Plaintiff sued the defendant for negligence and total liability. However, the court rejected to impose absolute liability. The case was appealed by Los Angeles County Supreme Court.
Facts:
Jenner (Defendant) has had seizures in the past, but not since the DMV issued him a license to operate a motorized vehicle. The defendant was under good care of his neurologist who deemed it safe for the defendant to operate his car. During that time, Jenner (Defendant) was driving home one day from work and crashed his vehicle

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Suspecting the driver was intoxacated, he stepped out of the vehicle; where Constable Meyers adminastered a field sobriety test. The driver failed the test, falling over twice while trying to balence on one foot. The officers took the driver into custody, and arranged for a tow truck to retreive the…

    • 98 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Durham v. McDonald’s Restaurants of Oklahoma, Inc. FACTS Camran Durham filed an intentional infliction of emotional distress lawsuit against his former employer, McDonald’s in Oklahoma. As he was denied three requests by McDonald’s manager which was his supervisor to take his prescription anti-seizure medication. After the denial of the last request the manager called him “f…ing retard”. Durham alleged that the refusals by the manager caused him to fear that he would suffer a seizure which made leave the work and not return. The federal court determined that the manager’s behavior was “not severe.”…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Girard Case Summary

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This action arose out of an incident that occurred on February 6, 2013, at the intersection of West Fullerton Avenue and North Artesian Avenue. Plaintiff, Kevin Girard (DOB: 8/2/1983) was driving home on his motor scooter after having dinner with his wife, Plaintiff, Lindsey Girard (DOB: 12/17/1980) Mr. Girard was driving, with a helmet on, and was traveling westbound on West Fullerton Avenue in the right lane. Defendant, Sharif Umar, is a taxi cab driver who leased his taxi from Defendants, Chicago Elite Cab Corporation, Chicago Carriage Cab Corporation, and the Medallion Funding Chicago Corporation. On February 6, 2013, Mr. Umar was driving his taxi southbound on North Artesian Avenue.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mr Jetke Case Summary

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mr. Jetke had completed an Independent Medical Evaluation (IME) and a clarification addendum was received by the claims adjuster, Rachel Ryke. Mrs. Ryke has now recommended case management to proceed with closure, as the IME physician does not feel that surgery is related to his work related injury, but rather it is degenerative in nature/aging process of the shoulder. No further treatment is needed pertaining to his work incident. .…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It additionally claims that the deadly crash was a "proximate result" of this police conduct. The District Court released for inability to express a case, presuming that the barrier was sensible in light of the current situation, and the Court of Appeals certified on the ground that no "seizure" had…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Oliver Vs Brock Case Study

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A civil suit is commonly derived from a private party or individual, who alleges damages from duty of care. Once a civil case begins, it is the duty of the plaintiff to prove, with evidence, duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and damages. Conversely, the defendant must prove their affirmative defense against documented allegations. The Oliver versus Brock case proves the importance of supporting evidence as opposed to hearsay statements, to prove the truth of the matter. In the Oliver versus Brock case, Cathy (Plaintiff) filed a lawsuit against Bryan Whitfield Memorial Hospital of Demopolis and the treating physicians Dr. F.S. Whitfield, Dr. Paul Ketcham and Dr. E.C. Brock (Defendant) for negligence of care.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Bryan S. Neiderhiser of Marcus & Mack Attorneys at Law in Indiana, Pennsylvania, represents clients in personal injury cases. His typical cases involve industrial accidents, medical malpractice, wrongful death, products liability, dangerous drugs or medical devices, premises liability, motor vehicle defects or animal attacks. Many of his clients are residents of Blair, Centre, Westmoreland, Armstrong, Bedford, Cambria, Clearfield, Elk, Huntington, Indiana, Jefferson and Somerset counties [1] or the Altoona and State College metropolitan areas. Prior to completing his Juris Doctor in 1997 at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law, Mr. Neiderhiser earned his Bachelor of Science in business management from Grove City College. In 1998,…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1. The Plaintiff, SHELLY WILSON, (hereinafter “WILSON”), alleges that the vehicle operated by the Defendant, BRENDA JOHNSON, (hereinafter “JOHNSON”), at the time she struck the Plaintiff’s vehicle, was registered, owned, and within the control of the Defendant, PERRY FRANKLIN (“FRANKLIN”). Prior to the date of the accident, Mr. Franklin was aware that Johnson’s driver’s license was suspended, and was an otherwise incompetent driver. The Plaintiff alleges that on the day of the accident, Ms. Johnson was driving Mr. Franklin’s vehicle with the knowledge and consent of Mr. Franklin, despite the fact that he knew that Ms. Johnson was an incompetent…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Lia's Serious Seizure

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Both chapters take place after Lia's serious seizure. Chapter fifteen explains how the Lees take care of Lia now and how she is in a vegetative state. We also see that the Lees are now seen as suitable and caring parents that want the best for their daughter rather than neglecting parents. This chapter showed the mistake made by the doctor and his failure to admit to it. Before, Lia's parents were not seen fit to take care of her but after the doctor's mistake they are suddenly viewed as good and caring parents.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Abstract Termination due to medical condition or disability is illegal and as it violates the laws enforced by U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. In the book Medical Law and Ethics, by Bonnie F. Fremgen she describes a case study, "The case of Janet K. and Epilepsy" on Chapter 8. "The Case of Janet K. and Epilepsy" describes the discrimination faced by employees. This case study will analyze the wrongful discharge of Janet, due to her epilepsy.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The plaintiff then fell backwards and hit his head on the pavement. The defendant was charged with the intentional tort of battery. The Court in that case ruled that the defendant’s use of force was not excessive since the defendant, on numerous occasions, asked the plaintiff to calm down, and the plaintiff instead became physical with the defendant by pushing him. The court stated that since the plaintiff was intoxicated and belligerent towards the defendant it was reasonable for him to believe that the plaintiff was a reasonable threat therefore his force in defending himself was not…

    • 1778 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Tort Of Negligence Essay

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Issue The matters involved in the case facts is if Rebecca can sue Michelle for negligence based on tort law and Rebecca?s decision to accept the ride home even if she knows that Michelle was drunk to drive. Rule The court needs to prove that Michelle has a duty of care to Rebecca. Secondly, there needs to be a breach of this duty due to the negligent conduct of Michelle.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He made sure that the father and the son was rushed to the hospital and others that were hurt and took statements. By the look of the crash he explained the bus ran into the plaintiff…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The lawsuit also gives a detailed description of what happened during the accident. It states that when the vehicle crashed and dismantled Walker's seat belt jerked…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As a vocational rehabilitation counselor I believe that Holly’s goals are very realistic and possible. She wants to first seek an appropriate job in her anticipated field of writing. She enjoys writing as a leisure activity and also has a writing background from a high school job, which could count as a transferable skill. She could work for a local newspaper, blog, magazine or even publishing company. She could start in an entry level position or as a paid intern.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays