The Social Contract And Discourse On Inequality

Improved Essays
Jean-Jacques Rousseau, an influential philosopher and writer during the enlightenment of the 18th century, explicitly expressed his view of slavery and alterity in two of his well-known works, The Social Contract and Discourse on Inequality. In The Social Contract, Rousseau supposes that man is born free, and no man should be able to rule over another , while simultaneously summarizing and refuting opposing claims made by relevant and significant philosophers before him.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau was born in Geneva, Switzerland on June 28, 1712, the second child to his father, Isaac Rousseau, and his mother, Suzanne Bernard. His mother died only nine days after his birth, so he grew up primarily under the care of his father, a clockmaker, until the age of 10. Jean-Jacque and his father shared a love Greek and Roman literature, which they bonded over for the first many years of Rousseau’s life. However, by the time Jean-Jacques reached ten years of age, his father ran into trouble with a French captain, and promptly decided to flee Geneva, leaving him behind to be cared for by relatives. After being abandoned by his father, Rousseau went to live with a maternal uncle. This uncle looked after Jean-Jacques for only a couple years before sending him and a
…show more content…
As man becomes sociable and slave to others, he becomes weak. With his depictions of both the savage man and the civil man, Rousseau makes it clear that neither one is necessarily greater than the other; each has its own set of flaws and faults, and they are more similar than some philosophers might believe. For example, man and beast both have and operate under instinct, but the man perceives his instinct as freedom. Instead, Rousseau posits that humankind would fare best operating under some middle ground between civil and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Jean Jacques Rousseau’s “The Social Contract” and the Declaration of Independence might at first appear as two heavily similar literary works. But in fact, the United States, Thomas Jefferson specifically, inferred heavily to Mr. Rousseau’s works in the drafting of the Declaration of Independence. These similarities are very evident as both documents demonstrate that without the consent of the governed there is to be no government. The question, however, is what specifically did Mr. Rousseau’s writings influence on the Declaration of Independence and what were the specific instances where the Declaration displayed influence.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Enlightenment Dbq

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau lived from 1712 to 1778, was one of the most influential philosophers during the Enlightenment in 18th century in Europe. Rousseau argued that the people and the government form a social contract. The people allow the government to have power over them, they consent to be governed. In return, the government promises to protect the rights of the people. Rousseau believed that the right of individuals to be free is one of the most important things that people have. Because of this, he believed that a good government had to protect those…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau was an English Philosopher whose work was influential especially in the eighteenth century. Some of his main works include the Discourse on the Sciences and Arts, and the Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. Both of these works were written in response to prompts from the Academy of Dijon. For the first discourse, the prompt was, “Has the restoration of the sciences and arts tended to purify morals?” and for the second discourse the prompt was, "What is the origin of inequality among men, and is it authorized by the natural law?"…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rousseau’s “savage man” is essentially an animal in human form, living in nature among the wildlife and the elements, his body as his only tool, non-communicative with others, his instincts placing survival over interpersonal relationships, and pity serving as a surrogate for law. Mentally the savage man is very simple, knowing only food, sex, rest, and pain, and whether to desire or avoid these events. Rousseau further compares this version of humanity to the modern man, noting that “in becoming habituated to the ways of society and a slave, he becomes fearful, and servile; his soft and effeminate lifestyle completes the enervation of both his strength and his courage” and even contends that “the difference between the savage man and the domesticated man should still be greater than that between the savage animal and the domesticated animal” (pg. 23). Even the lack of a communicative language was a benefit to the savage man, keeping him free of civil societies, personal relationships, and a sense of duty to others. The savage man was free to follow his instincts and roam the land as he saw fit, only guided by the need for self-preservation and only limited by uncontrollable natural…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When considering women’s equality in the United States, the average person considers examples such as the Suffragist movement at the turn of the twentieth century or the Feminist movement of the 1960s and 1970s. These two movements did not just occur on a feminine whim. They were often curated by previous movements and expectations held for women that they felt was necessary to update and change, much to the chagrin of the traditionalists of their respective time periods. The same can be said about both Republican Motherhood and the Cult of Domesticity. While overlapping, the two movements have many nuanced differences.…

    • 1935 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Rousseau’s On the Social Contract, has a plethora of information concerning how citizens must give up their individual liberties in order to engage in a successful social contract and achieve true freedom. It is interesting that Rousseau claims that liberties must be given up in order to achieve freedom, but argues that slaves are inherently not free because they do not have these liberties to give up to begin with. “Aristotle… had also said that men are by no means equal by nature, but that some are born for slavery and others for domination” (Rousseau 158).…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One of his best known quotes states that, “Man is born free, and he is everywhere in chains” (The Social Contract). In his Discourse on the Sciences and the Arts, Rousseau answers the question “Has the restoration of the sciences and the arts contributed to the purification of mores or to their corruption?” (Discourse on the Sciences and the Arts). He goes on to argue that the pursuit of science desensitized people to their natural, good state, and instead caused them to become slaves to meaningless burdens. Rousseau believed man was born inherently good, but by being introduced into society and the sciences, people become greedy and prideful.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The history of colonial America and the colonists’ erudite actions to gain their independence from Britain has served as a microcosm in history to display how the American Revolution was crucial and influenced several movements around the world such as the French Revolution. Some might even argue that the French Revolution also inspired European revolutionary movements and the Russian Revolution around the 1940s. The thirteen colonies altered the way they were being run and developed a unique form of a democratic government after colonists saw interference by the British as denial and restriction of their simple rights that other British subjects possessed without any limitations. The entire world was in awe after witnessing the thirteen colonies…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    INTRODUCTION Underlying Adams’ quote is the important question as to whether society is progressive and has positive implications for humans, or whether its implications are negative and corrupting. Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Émile Durkheim are two political theorists who battle in their writing to determine what is bad and what is good about society. This essay will consider how progressive or corrupting society is and in what ways, according to Rousseau and Durkheim. The essay will explore Rousseau’s argument about the ‘chains’ of society, and look at Durkheim’s contrasting view of the value of community in society.…

    • 2119 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The specific thoughts of Rousseau and Mill on freedom, the significance of social contracts, individual versus social freedom, and government’s role…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In order to be a citizen of the state, one must forgo ‘natural freedom’, for example any human being can with their ‘natural freedom’ hit another, it is completely within their ability to do so. But with ‘civil freedom and property’ one cannot act in this way as it harms another person and thus falls within the public realm. Furthermore one is expected to participate within society and take citizenship seriously under the social contract - one has a duty to the sovereign and thus every other citizen (as they are all part of the sovereign). According to Rousseau ‘civil freedom and property’ means that one’s “faculties are exercised and developed, one’s ideas are enlarged, one’s sentiments ennobled…” Rousseau clearly sees ‘civil freedom and property’ superior to ‘natural freedom’ as it enables one to be more enlightened - but this ‘civil freedom and property’ is entirely dependent on every citizen agreeing to the social…

    • 2188 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill Vs Rousseau Analysis

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Stuart Mill the liberal and Jean-Jacques Rousseau the republican, are two political philosophers whom focussed on the integration of political liberty with the relationship found between that of the individual, society and the state by the means of power or authority. Both of these political thinkers formed their arguments in their writings, namely; On Liberty (1859) by Mill, and The Social Contract (1913) by Rousseau. On a more specific scale, their views differed in much contrast, whereby Rousseau claims that people and individuals of society may only acquire the entity of freedom through a transitioning process from the natural state to the civil state, whereby they would have to conform to the general will as the common good. On the…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Karl Marx were three opposing philosophers during the Enlightenment with their own interpretations on government and people. Hobbes believed society needed an absolute monarchy, “to confer all their power and strength upon one man.” Locke said that human nature had natural rights, and were therefore “not to be under the will or legislative authority of man.” Finally, Marx believed in communism, in which belongings are public. All of the philosophies had their own relation to the social contract, which was introduced by Jean Jacques Rousseau.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monique Wilder Professor David Hill SSP 101.7920 July 15, 2015 Midterm 1) Explain the main differences and similarities between the ideas of Hobbes and Locke’s. Similarities include: rights, state of nature, atheism, powers of a sovereign, and the idea that governments are beneficial. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two social contract theorist who share similarities in their Social Contract Theories, however they both have differences. The social contract theory is a voluntary agreement among individuals by which organized society is brought into being and invested with the right to secure mutual protection and welfare or to regulate the relations among its members.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rousseau criticizes the state of nature described by Hobbes; instead of a constant state of fear, Rousseau described it as equality and happiness. Through the passage of time, the state of nature started to disappear as small communities formed, here man started to make comparisons to one another as class divisions developed. For Rousseau private property was a drastic change because communities went away from a simple state to one that consisted of greed and rivalry. Disapproving of Hobbes, who argued that people surrendered rights to an overall “ruler”, Rousseau believed people surrendered their rights to each other, in other words the community. For Rousseau, modern civilization took away the good parts of the early societies and replaced it with a society revolved around the state.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays