James I And Absolutism

Decent Essays
• Absolutism is a political theory in which one individual holds unlimited and complete power, with no challenges from the rest of the nation or government. This means the individual has ‘absolute’ power. • James I and absolutism: James I was the king of England from 1603 to his death in 1625. He united the thrones of England and Scotland and was the first of the Stuart Kings. • James I believed in the ‘Divine Right of Kings’, meaning simply that the ruler was chosen by God and thus cannot be challenged in any way, shape or form, this is a common defence of monarchical absolutism. • He also wrote ‘The True Law of a Free Monarchy’, this was his idea that he his ideals were for God and not the people, meaning he was free from all hindrance including …show more content…
He ruled England with the thought that everyone should obey and follow him. This caused a divide between him and the people as he held the most power. • Charles I and absolutism: Charles I ruled England between the death of his father, James I, in 1625 to his execution in 1649. He was the first ruling King of England to be executed and his greed for absolute power was the reason behind the English Civil war and the period of 11 years without a monarchy. • When Charles came to the throne after his father’s death there was high tension with parliament began at once due to Charles’ belief in the ‘Divine Right of Kings’ and his attempts at absolute power for the monarchy. • One of his first acts was to dissolve parliament in 1625, and again in 1626. In 1629, he dissolved parliament again and ruled without it until 1640. He summoned the ‘Short Parliament’ in April of 1640 but dissolved them after three weeks when they refused to grant him funds. • In November of 1640 the ‘Long Parliament’ as assembled and passed an act that stated it couldn’t be dissolved without its own

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Oliver Cromwell is an important figure in English history as he held a unique position of ruling as ‘Lord Protector’ instead of a monarch. This could result in Cromwell being perceived as a military dictator because the legality of his rule could be questioned. In addition to this he could be seen as an opportunist for military power because his increase in status was due to his role in the army in the First and Second English Civil Wars from 1642 to 1649 and he rose to prominence after the execution and abolition of monarchy on the 30th of January 1649. However, Cromwell not being part of the traditional constitution does not mean he should be viewed as a military dictator. The first section of this essay will portray how Cromwell in terms…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charles I’s abuse of power brought significant changes that impacted England because he dismissed the Parliament, created new religious laws that caused disputes and ignited the start of the English Civil War. Charles I often created new laws that were not passed through parliament and refused to take advice given by the members. During his rule he passed the ship money law during peacetime which angered many citizens. When Parliament disapproved of Charles I’s actions and, “…passed further measures displeasing to Charles, he dismissed Parliament”. The creation of this tax fortified his abuse of power because the English law prohibited the tax to have effect during peacetime; however, Charles I demonstrated he had the power to overrule…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Henry IV took the thrown France was in troubled times. The religious troubles that had plagued Europe since the Reformation had left no nation untouched. Out of the troubles of religion emerged an absolutist period in France. It started with Henry who allowed Cardinal Richelieu dictate his policy and continued to centralize France’s power. Henry’s policies like the Fronde the Law of Concord allowed Louis XIV to obtain the throne and impose his will on his French subjects.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He attempted to be an absolutist leader, but ultimately failed. He made very rash and poor decisions and tried to evade Parliament in the decisions he wanted to make such as levying taxes without Parliament permission. Radical Parliament members eventually got fed up with Charles I. A civil war was started in England and eventually England had Charles I executed for treason. Civil war and financial problems were the result of Charles I aspirations to become an absolutist leader in England.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The manner with which Charles led the British government is a little more difficult, but he still does not seem to be cruel or a lunatic. On the other hand, he inherited a position and a way of thinking that was not always good for his image or reflection on the government. King Charles…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2. Divine-Right Monarchy- Divine-Right Monarchy- was a political and religious doctrine that stated that only God can judge a king, and any that attempt to dethrone the king, is considered a sacrilegious act. A supporter of this theory was Bishop Jacques Bossuet, who expressed his ideas in a book called Politics Drawn from the Very Words of Holy Scripture. 3.) Intendants-…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many monarchs during the seventeenth century used absolutism as a governing force to rule their lands. During the reign of Louis XIV, Jean Domat wrote a profound document in which he addressed all areas of government and outlined what he believed to be the tenets of an absolute monarchy. This document, entitled “On Social Order and Absolute Monarchy” defined what he believed to be the basis of absolutism and class structure in regards to the law of God and the law of nature. Absolutism is as form of government where unrestricted, complete power is retained by a centralized sovereign individual. Domat displays immense support of the concept of absolutism and outlines the idea that the people should show loyalty to their one appointed leader who is chosen by God.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William James', “The Will to Believe, James provides a defensive response to religious faith regarding W. T. Clifford's position in his essay, "The Ethics of Belief" (James, 2001). Within his stance, James suggests that his views have a somewhat broader scope that Clifford’s (Princeton University, n.d.). Moreover, that in certain cases, it is not only permissible but inevitable that a person’s passional, non-rational nature will determine that person’s belief (Princeton University, n.d.). In summary, James presents that anything that is proposed for our belief is a hypothesis and that any question about which of the two hypotheses to accept is a person’s option (Princeton University, n.d.).…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The belief was “monarch's held their authority directly from God, that the king in his kingdom was as God in his creation, and enabled the absolutist monarchs to challenge the power of the church, effectively removing them as a rival to the sovereigns and making their power more absolute”. As stated in the article What was Absolutism? I don’t believe that his power was more absolute than men who were tried before him. Royalty in my opinion should not exempt any individual noble or peasant from being tried for their crimes. There should not be any bias especially when seeking justice or when attempting to uphold the law.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charles I was very much a key part in causing the regicide, as his unshakeable personality and damaging fatal flaw of stubbornness made sure he was unwilling to accept any sort of compromise from Parliament or the New Model Army. As he had shown earlier in his reign, in his rejection of the 1641 Nineteen Propositions (where Charles would have been able to stay in power to an extent and Parliament would have taken control of many of England’s political and religious policies, but Charles would still have some control, essentially peacefully doing exactly what the Civil Wars achieved), Charles was unwilling to agree to any terms that damaged his prerogative and belief in the Divine Right of Kings, which was what he believed was being set forward…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    We have incessantly and ineffectually besieged the throne as supplicants; we have reasoned and remonstrated with parliament in the most mild and decent language" (Setting Forth the Causes and Necessity of Their Taking up Arms) to no avail. " In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Louis XIV And Absolutism

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Absolutism states that monarchs have the divine right to rule people and received their authority from God. The monarchs have all of the power and everyone else must obey the monarchs. To do that, the monarchs must take away the power of the powerful nobles. Louis XIV did this by moving the powerful nobles to his court at Versailles where they were occupied with numerous activities. He then appointed people from the middle class to government positions, where he could dominate them and keep them from being a problem.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Absolutism is a political solution where the monarchy controls every facets of government with no checks or balances, it was initially introduced by the English by Kings, James and Charles I. Although it was introduced in the England (maybe Spain) it never did take hold mainly because of an established parliament that was so strongly ingrained into the English process of government. On the other hand, Louis XIV was able to secure an absolute monarchy and take it to extremes. He was able under the precept of “Divine Right” and claiming to be servant of God. This would allow Louis XIV to dissolve the Estates-General (a general assembly). Louis XIV is the poster child of what an absolute monarch is supposed to be and had no issue in letting the people of France know his status.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Absolutism was a political theory created by the following individuals; Jean Bodin, Thomas Hobbes (somewhat), and Bishop Bossuet. The era of absolutism was a time, 16th to 18th centuries, when monarchs ruled with all power to themselves in most countries, especially in France. Absolutism was favored among monarchs because it gave them complete power over their country and did not have to answer to anyone but themselves. Western absolutist France and eastern countries were similar by focusing on military aspects such as spending money to build large and powerful armies to win wars and gain land, and using increased taxation on lower classes to gain money, as well as monarchs ruling as the sovereign of that state. Eastern and western absolutism…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Absolutism Vs Monarchy

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Absolutism is known for being under a single leader. Many have stated that “monarchical government is the best.” In The Theory of Divine Right absolute monarch was the “most natural” which lead to it being the “most durable” and “strongest.” With the government under a single ruler it could also lead to it being the “most opposed to divisiveness”, “worst evil of states”, and the “most certain cause of their ruin.” In many societies absolutism “works in harmony” with everything.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays