JL Guest's Analysis

According to JL Guest, a conservative writer from the Western Journalism news company, we are a nation of laws where everyone is treated fairly and equally. Guest states that with a nation of laws, there is a greater balance of human nature, avoidance of government atrocities, and no corrupt officials that could use the imbalance of laws as a weapon to take over people’s basic rights and liberties. On the other hand, Skwirk, an online interactive learning portal, strongly puts in confidence that we are a nation of laws in order to implement rights and to solve clashes. The laws keep or discourage individuals from behaving in a way that adversely influences the nature of life of other individuals. Therefore, consequences are dealt by overstepping …show more content…
John Locke’s philosophy in regards to law in which Pei agreed on was that society in the absence of laws would be a cruel and punishing place. His thoughts were that everyone would have to defend their own lives. To explain, Pei believes people would have to protect themselves from being murdered and robbed because as John Locke said, individuals would have the right to life and property. On the contrary, Illona Levina, from the studymode resource center, grew to agree with Darwin’s theory based on law. Darwin’s theory states that only those who are strong will survive. For example, Levina mentions that if there were to be no laws in this nation, people would merely do as they pleased and would also discontinue from performing their daily responsibilities. Those who were weak would suffer tremendously due to the fact that they would not receive protection nor would be capable of defending themselves from a dangerous society. The strong, on the other hand, would actually have the opportunity to adapt to the harsh