Ivan Karamazov's The Grand Inquisitor

Improved Essays
As a character, Ivan Karamazov is the rational voice inside of all people. He may have his misgivings, but he strives to be superior to the other members of his family. He is not reckless like Dmitri, nor is he a spiritual idealistic. Rather, he strives to be the judge of his own actions and stand on the pulpit of righteous at the same time. Ivan rejects all higher orders, and instead sets up the individual man as the sole judge of what is right and wrong, independent of any system of religious belief or morality. In Ivan's view, "everything is permitted," even cannibalism, if the individual feels like it.
His life was extremely hard, even from the beginning. This could play a major role in the life he leads and how he interacts with other
…show more content…
He is a character who strives to gain knowledge, but the way that he is able to portray that knowledge is only through fantasy scenarios and through fictition. Ivan shares his poem, "The Grand Inquisitor," with Alyosha and brings about several important atheistic principles. “The Grand Inquisitor rejects free submission to God, choosing instead his own grief, resentment, and a sense of bitter righteousness. Ivan’s story is compelling and it leaves a lasting impression. It is what classic novels do: they suggest motivations and solutions, but in such a way as to invite interpretations that are never complete and always in need of another commentary or clarification.”** Ivan is especially prone to leaving lasting impressions because he connects with readers as someone who is struggling with his faith, but he puts on a mask of intelligence to show that he is not waging an inner battle. After their meal Ivan brings up an extremely important ideological belief that he holds, which is that “Everything is lawful” (Dostoevsky 238). This will come back to haunt him of course when he talks to Smerdyakov and he is told that through his teachings he was able to commit murder because there will be no consequences for him to come to grips with. This also makes Ivan the mouthpiece of Dostoevsky’s message that nihilism is dangerous and should be avoided for when there are no morals, there are no laws, and things could go radically wrong. By exemplifying the modern Russian, we see a character who is unable to cope when he sees that he was wrong. This manifests itself in the end, when he develops brain fever and becomes extremely ill because he realizes that the through the so called “prophecies” he convinced Smerdyakov to kill his

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Christian imagery and allegory are remarkably prevalent in many soviet films. This is reflective of the Russian Orthodox Church’s ineradicable position in Russian culture as well as the applicability – the universal nature - of the biblical story. Paradoxically, this phenomenon directly contradicts the idealized atheism of the soviet state. In this paper I will explore the different ways four of the thirteen films we have watched this semester incorporate Christianity.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A quote that helps us understand his reasoning for not endorsing Christianity in relation to suffering is that “{he}cannot accept an existence of a God that would allow such atrocities. ”(Devita) From this particular quote, Ivan is indirectly doubting the existence of a God because of self-centered behavior among humans. He implies that by adopting a theistic approach to solve suffering, Ivan implies that humans have become…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many people think of brutality and ruthlessness when discussing Ivan the Terrible. Although he was cruel and ruthless during his reign, Ivan IV, as he was formally known, did implement some lasting reforms for his country. There were many events, some tragic, in his life that greatly affected him and would ultimately have profound consequences during his reign. Ivan the Terrible was the Grand Prince of Moscow from 1533-1547 and called himself “Tsar of All of the Russians” until his death in 1584. He inherited the title of Grand Prince of Moscow at an early age which greatly affected how he ruled.…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ivan Ilyich lived a life filled with disingenuous relationships, self- interest, and “materialism.” Every decision that he made revolved around the attitude and opinions of his peers. Take his marriage for example; when considering whether or not to marry his wife, he chose to wed her, because “his social circle approved of the match...and…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through Applegate’s portrayal of Ivan, the reader learns that it is important to be loyal in life, because the traits that fall below that topic. A loyal person is trustworthy, faithful and will never betray anyone, just like…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ivan, his servant shows signs of abuse, his lack of voice and ability to hear leaving him vulnerable to oppression and his submissive behavior towards Zaroff. Many readers label his relationship with Ivan as employee and employer. The description of Ivan’s attire “a black…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ivan The Terrible Essay

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Firstly, his mental state was completely disturbed. When Ivan was younger, his parents died, so he…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Dimitri is arrested for Fyodor’s murder, Ivan feels guilty and defensively says “I’m not my brother’s keeper,” but Ivan finally accepts the guilt. Digging even deeper into Ivan’s childhood, it is apparent that in contrast to Alyosha, who we earlier discussed was carefree of where he lived, Ivan has alway been conscious and critical of these things. Therefore, he naturally possessed the inclination of an intellectual mind. However, what further complicates Ivan is a combination between a brilliant analytical mind and a heart that loves humanity but only shows concern on scholarly critics who distances himself from directly interacting in a loving manner with people. This intellectual and detached characteristic contrasts the active love Father Zosima teachers and Alyosha practices.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Once Ivan Ilych embraces his newfound humility by asking for forgiveness and faces his demise without fear, he truly embodies the fundamental qualities of a…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Leo Tolstoy wrote: The Death of Ivan Ilyich in 1886 to show his view of how life should be, how we all should live, and what actually matter most at the end of everything. According to Tolstoy, there are 2 ways to live life; one is by outer appearance which are propriety, decorum, and standards of conduct, and second, inner appearances, and spiritual life which are “the real thing” that makes one’s life worthwhile. Insincere life style is the first way human can choose to live and it is shown at the beginning of novel when Tostoy explains that Ivan Ilyich’s life is based on an outer appearances and social statuses means. He is surround by “the best circles of lawyers, and wealthy gentry in town...” (54).…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The ability to distinguish a good person from an evil person is usually a simple task. Although in most literary works, it can be more difficult to differentiate between the two. In society people are quick to draw a line between good and evil but as people grow and face new experiences that line can become blurred and morals and values begin to change. In the novel, Crime and Punishment, Raskolnikov can be branded as a morally ambiguous character. Raskolnikov can be viewed as morally ambiguous because he is portrayed as if he has two different personalities.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As the title character of Tolstoy’s The Death of Ivan Ilyich takes his final breaths, he mutters “death is over…there is no death,” (134). In the same way, The Death of Ivan Ilyich is a story about the life leading up to death, rather than death itself. Through both Ivan and the rest of the characters, Tolstoy offers moral advice regarding how to handle the ultimate buildup to death. Ivan’s family and colleagues’ grandiose materialism is strikingly contrasted with the servant Gerasim’s selflessness. In fact, Gerasim’s personality is so divergent from the rest of Tolstoy’s characters he is often depicted as an impractical one-dimensional character.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One question I have is, if Ivan had grown up in different circumstances with a family he could rely on, a government that provided aid, and society that did not repress his people, would he have been able to enjoy his fame without as many outside forces working against him, or can this situation occur in any setting? Could a situation like this happen today in America where our government can provide some aid to those who are struggling, or was the impoverished Jamaican society that Ivan lived in the deciding factor of his fate? Another question I have is, if the church had tried to help Ivan after he murdered the man who claimed he owned Ivan’s bike, rather than turning Ivan away so he could no longer practice his faith, would the protagonist still have had a chance to be successful in life? The Pastor clearly did not care for Ivan and made sure he could not practice his faith there because he was a sinner.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nature and nurture are the very essential building elements of an individual’s character. A controversial, yet often recognizable concept that some people are born more intelligent, charismatic, loving or even on the dark side. The effect of one’s upbringing, surrounding environment and the influence of certain events, neither anticipated nor facilitated by the individual are also significant. In order to make such an observation of character, I will be concentrating on the sons of Fyodor Karamazov in The Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor Dostoevsky. The moral stance of the four sons ranges from Alyosha, who is said to be good by nature and Smerdyakov, the one who murdered his father without a shred of guilt.…

    • 1688 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Due to this reason, his resentment toward his family increases which accumulates his mental sufferings. Ivan doesn’t believe his pains will be so terrible that will end his life until he goes over the syllogism of Kiesewetter’s logic. In the syllogism he learns about the example of Caius, and he analyzes the syllogism in three different parts. After his analyzation, he realizes his pain is a severe problem, and it will cause him death. Although he wants to force himself to think about the healthy thought, he can not exactly forget the understanding from the example of Caius.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays