Isaac Ehrlich On Capital Punishment

Improved Essays
Capital punishment has been a very diverse and controversial argument between right and wrong in social and political American culture. Some of these arguments include retribution or justice for the crime committed, deterrence of future crimes, and prevention of future crimes from that individual. Prevention of future crimes differs from deterrence because the prevention of future crimes is focused on preventing the same individual from committing future crimes. Contrarily, deterrence focuses on preventing other individuals in society from committing not only the crime being punished for, but also, any other crime. In this paper, I will focus on the argument of deterrence. Although the research done by pro-death penalty supporters, like Isaac Ehrlich, dates back to the 1970’s, the argument presented for the deterrence factor of capital punishment is unaffected by time. Isaac Ehrlich concluded that future would-be murderers would make a decision between illegal and legal, (right and wrong) behavior based on the threat of execution. I suggest capital punishment doesn't deter people from committing serious violent crimes. The thing that deters is the likelihood of being caught and punished.
Ehrlich was one
…show more content…
In the past multiple researchers have attempted to replicate Ehrlich’s results without success. The complexity and time length of Ehrlich’s experiment is likely the reason that other researchers are having difficulties producing the same results. Because on the conflicting results and outcomes, then the argument for the proponents of capital punishment becomes opposite for which they intend. If you are unable to conclude that you are taking the criminals life to help a greater number of people, then it would be a “wrong” action and on the same as committing

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    From these numbers it is hard to see capital punishment as a crime deterrent. To further see the falsehood in capital punishment as a deterrence I searched Canada’s homicide rate. The homicide rate in Canada in 1975 (capital punishment abolished in 1976) was at 3.03 (victims per 100,000 people).…

    • 1370 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tess Hutchinson Crimes

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages

    There is no connection to Tessie Hutchinson and the individuals sentenced to capital punishment; however, a link between these suspects and the villagers in The Lottery exist. For a convicted criminal who is condemned to capital punishment, they have committed a major offense and endangered people within their community. The villagers are also members of these acts because they are taking innocent lives; as well as, putting more people of their community in danger by continuing the lottery each year. As stated previously, by implementing capital punishment into the American system, we continue to deter a copious amount of homicides.…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “I see no alternative but to conclude that capital punishment cannot be justified on the basis of its deterrent effect” (Marshall,1972). Proving that is really is not a deterrence. Although one example of where capital punishment could be seen as an effective possible deterrent would be in The District of Columbia which has no death penalty has a very high rate of homicides. There are other deterrents to crime other than Capital Punishment, there is incarceration, fines, moral prohibitions and many others. One study, found that the elevated levels of assurance of arrest on crime lowered the burglary rate in Canada (Zedlewski, 1983).…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Article Summary #1: Author William Tucker uses his 2000 American Spectator article to explain why the death penalty is actually a deterrent to criminals. Tucker analyzes the statistics of crime over the years and concludes that when death penalty rates are up, murder rates are down, and when execution rates decrease, the rate of homicides rises (par. 13). While many criminologists believe that the death penalty doesn’t affect the amount of murders that take place in America, Tucker counters by saying, “The results are plain to see. Beginning at almost the exact point when executions ended, murder soared to unprecedented heights.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The death penalty has caused tension between more than just those who enforce it and those who receive it. The shock waves caused by the death penalty can be found building tension within the conversations of those who may not have a true role in the process but who, in the eyes of the American democracy, have a voice on the matter. As an observer of the current and past status of the death penalty, one can form the opinion and understanding the necessity of capital punishment in the form of the death penalty. The death penalty has been apart of the court rulings since its reinstatement in 1988. Although those who are against the death penalty would argue that each one of these deaths were not necessary to the safety of our nation..…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This process is then represented intermittently in this country during the last 35 years. It then concludes that as a deterrent, and the relatives frequency to murder that “it is a function of the cultural condition of whether a not a person is given the death penalty”(Schuessler). He quotes that if “ people are believed to refrain from crime because they fear punishment. Since people fear death more than anything else, the death penalty is the most effective deterrent, so runs the argument” From Schuessler’s focuses on how the US homicide and execution data for the periods of 1925-49 it has been organized around six topics which are; (1) the purpose of measuring the deterrent influence of the death penalty, (2) the deterrence viewpoints,(3) whether fewer murders occur in places where murder is punishable by death than in places where it is not, (4) difference in use of death penalty,(5) consistency between deterrence viewpoint and murder rates, (6) lastly general appraisal of the deterrent value of the death penalty. Lastly, Muhlhausen from US News discusses in an article about how the death penalty saves lives.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ernest van den Haag didn’t use a large amount of evidence to support his opinion, instead, he used a lot more common sense and moral and non-moral purpose of death penalty to explain why capital punishment should not be abolished in the United States. Surprisingly, Ernest van den Haag didn’t use any sources or research findings to serve as evidence, instead, he liked to explain his perspective by simply saying it. An example of this can be found in his third point, where he points out that according to some research data, death penalty is the most deterrent punishment available in the society without citing any sources. Besides the evidence and sources utilization, his logic is clear and well maintained throughout the paper. He gives several real life example to demonstrate his point on the death penalty problem, the case and effect relation is clear and solid.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Haag, a sociologist, wrote an extensive explanation on why the death penalty would help deter criminals from committing crimes. He has stated that the death penalty may be the only way to keep some people from committing crimes. He has said that this will help reduce the number of victims to crimes such as murder and rape. Haag also feels that if the punishments for a crime is raised then the desire to commit a crime is quickly diminished. I agree with Haag.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many argue that the Death penalty functions as a specific and general deterrence in society. For instance, general deterrence aims to make the individual aware of similar consequences occurring if he or she were to commit a similar offense (Fuller 2014, 20). Whereas, specific deterrence focuses on preventing the perpetrator itself from recidivating, due to understanding the consequences of having that behavior (Fuller 2014, 20). It is argued that one fears death and would rather face a life sentence in prison than Capital punishment. This allegedly is the reason why those who deviate lessen the severity of their offense to avoid the Death penalty.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Texas Deterrence Effect

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Texas, who has the highest execution rate, is used to determine whether or not the executions in this state are effective in deterrence of crime. Richard Dieter feels that the execution rate in Texas is a crisis (1994). Numerous offenders who have been sentenced to the death penalty have been later found innocent of the crimes they were accused of committing. The death warrants are signed so quickly that the investigations are not given a fair amount of consideration. During trials the corrupted prosecutors, unreliable medical “experts”, and perjured testimonies have led to false imprisonment of many people.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital Punishment: An Annotated Bibliography When considering the possibility that capital punishment could be justified as a response towards evil action. Approvingly that capital punishment is an appropriate crime punishment in a response to murder, “the greatest crime known to the law.” As capital punishment is not morally permissible as a response to evil, then it cannot be permissible morally. If capital punishment cannot be justified towards a response in evils acts, when will it ever be justified.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The evolution of punishment practices with time has been influenced by the underlying justification for the punishment: namely utilitarian, retributivist, or a combination of the two. The concept of general deterrence utilizes the threat of punishment to deter society from crime, and the reasoning behind punishment based on those grounds will be examined in this essay. Rehabilitation rationale will also be analyzed to highlight the respective strength of general deterrence and retribution in offenders receiving the punishment they deserve. The utilitarian and rational strengths associated with the threat of punishment makes general deterrence the most convincing utilitarian justification; however, general deterrence alone may give rise to a system in which punishment is not certain or just, necessitating the retributivist establishment of culpability and the reduction of unfair advantages. Since the Enlightenment, the practice of punishment has revolved around the twin cores of rationality and utilitarianism, and the necessity in making the perceived costs of crime not worth…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    American prisons are extremely overpopulated, thus executing the worst kind of criminals will be beneficial to the prison system. Various workers in the criminal justice field also believe that capital punishment costs less than life imprisonment. The death penalty ensures that fewer taxpayers’ money is spent for the maintenance of individuals that have acted against society in the most violent way (Kasten, 1996). Capital punishment is the only way that victims and their families can get the justice that they…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment or simply the death penalty, is usually the harshest sentence reserved for those who have committed such reprehensible acts that they warrant death. In justifying punishment, there has been significant discourse regarding a retributive point of view and a consequentialist one. Retributivists, such as Immanuel Kant, posit that punishing those who have done wrong is justifiable because we are merely giving them what they deserve in return for what they have done. On the other hand, consequentialists assert that punishment is justifiable as it brings about positive consequences such as crime deterrence, rehabilitation, and social protection. In this paper, we will primarily examine the Kantian approach to capital punishment as well as its objections, followed by the consequentialist view as a secondary response in formulating a more comprehensive view of its justification.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    People live in a society that is surrounded by violent behavior for that reason the justice uses the death penalty to send out a positive message for those who tend to commit capital offence. Capital punishment is not an act we wish to place on a single soul, but it is the best way to keep the killer out of society and prevent any further murders. There is no concrete evidence of either positive or negative effect, but this does not mean it would not help lower the crime rate. People need to understand that the best way to prevent any possible murders in the future is not let the killer walk free. The death penalty allows us to see the seriousness of a crime and the value of life.…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays