However, when the platform is widened to allow the selection of “aesthetic traits such as eye color and hair about 72% disapprove and view it as unethical. “Bioethicists believe that regulations on designer baby technology should not affect its use to detect and prevent diseases, but prevent it for the use of “promoting a narrow set of socially admired physical or aesthetic traits.”(Lerner)(1) Some worry that these types of modification could be used as new tools to eugenics; the practice of improving genetic quality of the human population. Those who support the technology such as James Hughes who see the “genetic modification of humans as not only a natural progression of our species, but a right in the same category as abortion.” For Hughes, “if you think women have the right to control their bodies, then they should be able to make this
However, when the platform is widened to allow the selection of “aesthetic traits such as eye color and hair about 72% disapprove and view it as unethical. “Bioethicists believe that regulations on designer baby technology should not affect its use to detect and prevent diseases, but prevent it for the use of “promoting a narrow set of socially admired physical or aesthetic traits.”(Lerner)(1) Some worry that these types of modification could be used as new tools to eugenics; the practice of improving genetic quality of the human population. Those who support the technology such as James Hughes who see the “genetic modification of humans as not only a natural progression of our species, but a right in the same category as abortion.” For Hughes, “if you think women have the right to control their bodies, then they should be able to make this