Negligence Premise Liability Vs. Homeowners

Improved Essays
Claim #1 Negligence: Premises liability vs. Homeowner
Injury: Vicky received multiple hornet stings, providing an allergic reaction, which is a physical injury sufficient for a negligence claim.
Duty: Vicky is considered to be an unknown trespasser. That means that she is not only trespassing, but the landowners are unaware of her presence. Vicky was given no permission expressed or implied to be on the property. In this case the homeowners were not home, when the incident causing injury occurred. A defendant owes no duty of care to a trespasser he is not aware of. Also, the defendant has not duty to continually surveil his property for unknown trespassers. Hypothetically, Vicky may argue that her trespassing was foreseeable to the homeowners,
…show more content…
Both are physical injuries and a sufficient basis for a negligence claim.
Duty: Generally, no duty is owed to aid or rescue an injured person. However, once a person has voluntarily provided aid that person now has a duty of reasonable care to the injured person, not necessarily successful care. In our case, both Dwayne and Felix had voluntarily undertaken a duty to aide Vicky with reasonable care.
Breach: Dwayne and Felix breached their duty of reasonable care to Vicky. They pulled her away from the hornets’ nest and correctly called emergency assistance. However, after the emergency operator instructed them that ambulance was on its way, they hung up and proceeded to leave the scene. Before leaving, they acted unreasonably by carrying Vicky and dropping her to the ground at one point. Their idea was that moving Vicky closer to the road, would allow the ambulance to find her faster. However, the ambulance was responding to the exact GPS location from where the phone call came. And since Dwayne and Felix were not present to direct the ambulance, their replacement of Vicky actually caused confusion for the ambulance. A reasonable person would not have prematurely hung up on the operator, and I assume the operator would have told them not to move Vicky and not to flee the
…show more content…
Therefore, their breach of engaging in the unreasonable carrying of Vicky, factually and proximately caused the injuries to her shoulder.
Affirmative Defense: With this claim Vicky in no way contributed to the injuries of her shoulders. Dwayne and Felix took it upon themselves to carry her causing the injury. She would have been better off if they would have just fled the scene after calling 911. She had no control of them carrying or dropping her to and in no way contributed to their decision to do so.
Damages: Vicky should be awarded personal injury damages, for the injuries to her shoulder. Such damages will include any medical bills or rehabilitation expenses both past and future, in order to repair her shoulder. I would want to know if this shoulder injury forced Vicky to miss any time from her teaching duties. As she would be compensated for lost income or future earnings as well. Also Vicky may be compensated for any pain or emotional distress that directly stems from the incident causing her shoulder

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Jon M. Espinoza's Case

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ms. Espinoza stated that throughout the claimant’s probationary period from 8-3-2015 through his LDW on 11-25-2015, the claimant never reported any injuries or illnesses either to her or to Supervisor Mr. Gerardo Navarrete. Ms. Espinoza checked her personnel records and the claimant’s personnel file and did not find any injuries leading up to the claimant’s current claim of injuries that allegedly occurred on 11-20-2015. Ms. Espinoza stated that after the claimant’s termination on 11-25-2015, when the claimant was terminated for cause, approximately two weeks after she was served with legal documentation via the mail from the claimant’s attorney at the Law Offices of Jon M. Woods. The service was conducted on 12-14-2015. The claimant and…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jay is entitled to full compensation of the life insurance policy that occurred as a result of Joleene’s death. This is because Joleene had already paid the first premium of the Life insurance policy. Even if she had submitted the medical examination form, it would have had no connection to her death since the medical examination form would only show internal diseases and disorders or other internal factors. In this case her death was not as a result of any internal factor so the medical examination form cannot come in the way of Jay claiming the compensation from the life insurance policy that Joleene had taken up. It would have been a different case if Joleene had not paid the premium to the insurance company but in this case she had shown her commitment and seriousness to this policy by paying up the premium hence Jay can comfortably claim the compensation from Magnum Life Insurance co.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marshall is the purchasing agent for the DigitoolArt Corporation. His duties require him to negotiate and execute contracts to purchase office supplies and equipment for the corporation. Assume that Bronson, a computer salesperson, pays Marshall a $20,000 kickback to purchase from him computers needed by the DigitoolArt Corporation. What breach of the duty of loyalty has Marshall committed here? A) competing with the corporation B) making a secret profit C) self-dealing D) usurping a corporate opportunity 4.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mr. Chavez stated that the claimant’s job required the claimant to use handheld tools along with small and large equipment such as wheel barrels, forklifts, and Bobcat Skip loaders. He stated that the physical demands of his job were 100 % that consisted of pushing, pulling, lifting, kneeling, and bending while using the handheld tools. Mr. Chavez said the claimant’s job required the claimant to lifting an average 90 pounds to include items such as bags of concrete, roofing materials, mortar, boxes of tiles, sinks, lavatories, doors, and street lights. Also, to these duties of carrying and lifting items, the Claimant’s physical functions requires the Claimant to perform the following physical motions: Kneeling, squatting, bending at the waist and bending at the neck.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The applicant testified there were no witnesses to this incident. He claimed he believed he informed the companies supervisor, Mr. Greg Whitaker, the next day. However, as you know, there was a delay in medical treatment. I questioned the applicant regarding this delay. The applicant claimed it was the carrier’s responsibility to make an appointment and claimed he initially requested medical treatment the day after the date of injury.…

    • 1891 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    what happened on the murder of candace montgomery ax murder, was it an accident or was it on purpose for what happened that day that the murder occurs what made candace montgomery commit this murder. candace montgomery was a women that live in wylie tx she was a single woman but she met this guy that was marry over the time the guys name was allen and his wife was name gore. gore didn't know about the affair they were having until later on something terrible would happen. in this article,Gore had accused friend Candace Montgomery of having an affair with her husband.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ANTHONY BELL’S CLAIM FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION. Anthony Bell, by and through his undersigned attorney, respectfully submits the following memorandum of law: ISSUES PRESENTED Can an employee receive workers’ compensation for an injury sustained at a mandated, social, work event when he attended an annual picnic organized by his employer, and got injured while participating in a game of football during the picnic? Can an employee receive Workers Compensation for a recurring injury when he was injured in the same place as before but this time the injury was aggravated during the course and scope of his employment? INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Anthony Bell was denied workers’ compensation by his employer, Safe Place Children’s Home, the defendant. He now requests that the Deputy Commissioner of the North Carolina Industrial Commission award him Workers’ Compensation for the injury to his right rotator cuff sustained at the mandatory annual picnic held by his employer because although it was a recurring injury, it was one that was aggravated by an accidental injury that arose out of and in the scope…

    • 2080 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niles Case Study

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Niles had every right to file a lawsuit against the City of San Rafael because there was a breach of duty that caused foreseeable damage to the Kelly. If Kelly would have suffered no harm, then that would have not been grounds to sue. Mr. Niles won the case because he was able to prove that all four elements of negligence were present. Mr. Niles was able to prove that duty of care was not properly conducted. Duty is defined as the legal obligation of care, performance, or observance to safeguard the rights of others.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sam Clover Case Study

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Clover was diagnosed with smoke inhalation, a separated shoulder, and burns on both legs that required intensive treatment. The fire that spread to Clover’s home was started by Clover’s next-door neighbor, David Soul (“Soul”). This memorandum addresses whether the firefighter’s rule compels a determination that Soul owed no duty of care to…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Personal Comfort Doctrine

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Commissioner will probably rule that Brill’s injury is not eligible for workers compensation under the personal comfort doctrine. When a worker is injured on the job, they can request compensation from the employer. The courts have recognized that injuries may occur during employee breaks and, although employees are not technically “on the job,” they may still be eligible to request compensation if the injury falls within the bounds of the personal comfort doctrine. For an injury to be compensable under the personal doctrine, the injury must arise from behavior that is considered to be an imperative act, and from behavior that has a logical nexus to the worker’s employment.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The impact caused the neighbor to fly 20 feet into an embankment causing her injuries and hurled Elizabeth under the defendant’s vehicle resulting in her death. The husband, Benjamin sustained injuries and ‘mental and emotional’ disturbances. Defendant filed an appeal. Procedural History: Multiple plaintiffs filed 3 different cases against defendant Graham.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The hope is that the client is able to regain or re-own her potential so she is properly able to cope with her injury and the added stress it has put on her life (Harman, 1974). Ideally, the client will learn to handle things that happen to her in the most helpful and healthy ways. Preferably the client will be able to go about her life back in a normal fashion of being able to work properly without fear getting fired, understand that she is a good mother and will be able to provide for her children, those feelings of hopelessness will be gone and be able to get an adequate amount of sleep at…

    • 2060 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas A&M-Commerce M.S. Accounting Comprehensive Exam Matthew Naab CWID: 50112666 October 2, 2014 1.) #1 – Advanced Management Accounting If three businesses show cash increases of $15 million on their balance sheets, they will likely have very different financial positions depending on the source or destination of cash during the period.…

    • 3795 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the law of delict there are five elements that should be considered before someone is held liable for an act that caused damage. These elements include the nature of the act, the wrongfulness/unlawfulness of the act, the damage caused by the act, that causal link and lastly the fault. If the evidence obtained from the act and matched against the element is adequate and proves that the act caused the damage then it can be concluded that the act did indeed cause the act and someone or an organisation will be held liable for the damage caused and will have to face certain consequences. In most case at school the educator is held responsible for the damage the learners suffered but educators cannot be held accountable for everything that happens…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Importance Of Omission

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This duty of care means that if you create a dangerous situation, you are liable for any harm caused if you have not taken reasonable steps to prevent the harm occurring. The act may be done innocently, but there is still a duty to prevent harm. The case of R v Miller illustrates this. Miller was charged with arson, contrary to ss. 1 (1) and (3) Criminal Damage Act 1971.…

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics