Section C: Solution Description To address the proposition to improve the infection prevention and policy, an acceptable method of solution must be determined. The solution is not always an obvious source nor does it mean that it will be attainable by normal measures. In this case, the proposed problem: infection prevention in neutropenic patients in the outpatient chemotherapy setting suggests, a standardized policy with care set with antimicrobial prophylaxis consideration is needed. The question stands, is this attainable? This paper will briefly review the solution description, method of field application, financial resources and logistical steps along with possible obstacles to implementation. As previously determined, the need for
…show more content…
Patients will be asked to participate in a study (possibly establish an IRB) to determine if the rate of neutropenic fever has reduced as a result of the increase infection policy. In regard to the proposition for antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients that meet certain criteria, the care-set would be the most time consuming and difficult change for physicians with the possible obstacle of insurance approval and precertification for services. The same route of survey method and participant research (a test and control group) of patients on and off of therapy will participate in a study to determine the effectiveness of the preventative method along with new infection control policy. Previous studies could be referred to for substantial support in favor of the proposed changes at no additional cost. In conclusion, the overall rational for the prosed change must be the center of focus, to help serve the community and patient in the best way possible. The outcome will be supportive to patients but, also provide care givers (RN’s, allied health and physicians) the ability to improve their knowledge and ability to help not only the patient but change the path for future medicine. While the expected outcomes are favorable and attainable, the proposal will require time, resources (staff and patients) and a considerable amount of
Patients will be asked to participate in a study (possibly establish an IRB) to determine if the rate of neutropenic fever has reduced as a result of the increase infection policy. In regard to the proposition for antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients that meet certain criteria, the care-set would be the most time consuming and difficult change for physicians with the possible obstacle of insurance approval and precertification for services. The same route of survey method and participant research (a test and control group) of patients on and off of therapy will participate in a study to determine the effectiveness of the preventative method along with new infection control policy. Previous studies could be referred to for substantial support in favor of the proposed changes at no additional cost. In conclusion, the overall rational for the prosed change must be the center of focus, to help serve the community and patient in the best way possible. The outcome will be supportive to patients but, also provide care givers (RN’s, allied health and physicians) the ability to improve their knowledge and ability to help not only the patient but change the path for future medicine. While the expected outcomes are favorable and attainable, the proposal will require time, resources (staff and patients) and a considerable amount of