The Role Of Justice In Criminal Justice

Improved Essays
Introduction

Justice means to do just, to do what is right. Egalitarians believe that justice can only exist within the coordinates of equality. Whether, in reality, this equality is given to all at every time so that justice could actually be done? Equality does not only mean equal representation of both victim and accused before court or equal opportunity of being heard.
Equality, for justice, also means that both the victim as well as accused have a fair chance of representing their side of story so that no innocent would suffer at the hands of law.

The importance of the witnesses to the trial process could be inferred from the words of the eminent thinker Jeremy Bentham: “Witnesses Are the Eyes and Ears of Justice.” The ordinary meaning
…show more content…
Anirudh Singh observed that: “It is the salutary duty of every witness who has the knowledge of the commission of the crime, to assist the State in giving evidence.”

Wadhwa J. in Swaran Singh v. State of Punjab while commenting on the importance of a witness in the criminal justice system observed: “A criminal case is built on the edifice of evidence, evidence that is admissible in law. For that, witnesses are required whether it is direct evidence or circumstantial evidence.”

Thus a witness is an important party in a case apart from the complainant and the accused. Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System while emphasizing the importance of a witness says: “By giving evidence relating to the commission of an offence, he performs a sacred duty of assisting the court to discover the truth. It is because of this reason that the witness either takes an oath in the name of God or solemnly affirms to speak the truth, the whole of the truth and nothing but truth. He/she performs an important public duty of assisting the court in deciding on the guilt or otherwise of the accused in the case. He submits himself to cross-examination and cannot refuse to
…show more content…
Protecting witnesses from intimidation or physical threats from crime suspects is therefore a requirement to uphold the rule of law. In the case of Krishna Mochi v. State of Bihar . Supreme Court observed that society suffers by wrong convictions and it equally suffers by wrong acquittals. The main crisis being faced by Criminal Justice System relates to intimidation or allurement of victims or witnesses leading to inevitable consequences of collapse of trial. In Krishna Mochi Case the Supreme Court pointed out various reasons why the witnesses are not deposing in the court or why their deposition is not found credible. It was observed that one of the reasons may be that they do not have courage to depose against an accused because of threats to their life, more so when the offenders are habitual criminals or high ups in the Government or close to power which may be political, economic or other powers including muscle

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    People make decisions on the basis of circumstantial evidence in the everyday affairs of life. Nonetheless, the sources that stated the court…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The justice approach stems from the Aristotelian philosophy where it is stated that “equals should be treated equally and unequals unequally”. The justice model of ethical decision-making can be described as “moral obligation to act on the basis of fair adjudication between competing claims. Hence, when making the decision, the individual should assess how fair the action will be and if it could potentially discriminate and show favouritism. Discrimination by definition “imposes burden on people who are no different from those on whom burden are not imposed”. Favouritism, on the other hand, provides benefits to a certain group of people, without a justifiable reason.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lucy McMillan, a Former Slave in South Carolina, Testifies About White Violence, 1871 feels like a communication/question testimony that occurs in communities for point of views on different classified subject matters. This document does indeed originate from an excerpt from Testimony Taken by the Joint Select Committee to Inquire into the Condition of Affairs in the Late Insurrectionary States (Washington 1872) Because it stands as a creation of a group venture of a committee from the U.S. Congress, there is no singular identifiable author as a “face”. Thus the identifiable figure taken from these testimonies is really people who are asked to be involved in thus testimony; with this excerpt displaying information from the answers of Lucy McMillan.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The term crime cannot be defined easily because it does not have one definition nor two; crime is a concept. Moreover, crime is based on a general notion of ideals formed by society, according to time and place (Friedman, 1993, 6). Society does not imply all individuals, the rich and powerful create the laws that compose certain acts as a crime and are then enforced by law enforcement (Friedman, 1993, 10). Thus, giving law enforcement control and power over all individuals. Their job is to protect and serve within their community.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    General Difference Between Successful and Unsuccessful Mental Disorder Defense Despite many characteristics mentioned in the above, the fact that most individuals found NCRMD have had previous contact with the psychiatric system or history records with the criminal justice system are very interesting to acknowledge. When compared with individuals with successful the NCRMD defense and unsuccessful NCRMD defense, individuals with NCRMD found more involvement with the psychiatric previously(Gullets, 2016). It suggests that the offenders who have been diagnosed with a mental disorder in the past have more possibility of successful NCRMD defense compared to others with no previous records with the psychiatrist. In another words, the previous records…

    • 1688 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How Visual Evidence Influenced the Boston Marathon Case It’s April 15th, 2013, the 117th running of the Boston Marathon. The runners line up at the start, with thousands of fans along the sidelines, all eagerly waiting to see who the next Boston Marathon winner will be. At 2:49 pm, the event went from cheerful to tragic. Within 12 seconds, two bombs go off 100 yards away from each other, killing three people, including an 8 year old boy.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Now this case was based solely on circumstantial evidence, with no direct evidence, and yet it was still the job of the trier of fact to decide whether the evidence provided held enough relevance to the case to convict Hodge. Fortunately for Hodge, the jury found that the evidence presented did not meet a two-part test. First, for the jury to find Hodge guilty they must be “convinced of two things: (1) that the circumstances were consistent with Hodge having committed the crime, and (2) the facts were inconsistent with any other rational conclusion.” This case still holds precedence for current trials that are solely based on…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The prosecution witnesses, both Ms Molly Simpson and Ms Jessica Clancy gave evidence to support the case in court. A witness must stay outside the courtroom until his or her name is called. When they are called they must take the witness stand and swear an oath or make an affirmation to tell the…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    When a person becomes a criminal defendant they are granted constitutional rights that can be used to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The result of the Crawford v Washington case defined the standard for determining the admission of hearsay statements in cases permitted under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. In conclusion, the Crawford v. Washington case impacted the Supreme Court of Virginia’s decision in Briscoe v. Commonwealth and Cypress v. Commonwealth. The defense attorneys and prosecutors in Virginia should proceed in caution of the sixth amendment with confronting witnesses. Keywords, Briscoe v. Commonwealth, Cypress v. Commonwealth, Crawford v. Washington, Sixth Amendment The Supreme Court of the…

    • 1007 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Few Good Men Essay

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A witness is any policeman, lay person, or expert who is called to court to help determined the innocence of the accused. In this movie, we basically see every type of witness. We hear from different lay people, which are basic bystanders. These happen to be lower class military men. We hear from high up military men, who almost act as police, even though they aren’t.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When an officer needs to testify he needs to be confident and prepared when they are called upon to testify in court. Though when finding proof you need proof beyond a reasonable doubt even if the suspect admitted to doing it. How it works if the jurors or judge have no doubt as if the…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It reiterates on there key factors of an Expert Witness which is Retain, Record and Reveal. Moreover criminal proceeding rules emphasize on the criminal proceeding rules adding to it and emphasizing the obligation of the Expert Witness and his duty to the court binds him thus overriding all other obligation especially if he had accepted any bribery or other instruction, which are detrimental to the case itself.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Balancing the tension between community interest and individual rights and freedoms are a significant component of the criminal trial process and is relatively successful in that retrospect. In order to be effective and efficient the criminal trial process should reflect the moral and ethical standards of society, ensure the community is sufficiently protected and respects the rights of the individual. However, despite efforts to achieve justice for all members of society, the criminal trial process does fail to provide adequate success in some areas of the law such as the jury system, Legal Aid and the provocation defence. All these areas to an extent highlight the lack of success the criminal trial process serves in balancing community interests…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    | | | |No enquiry allowed into jury deliberations after verdict, even if juror | |Section 51 Criminal Justice & Public Order Act 1994 creates offence |alleges racial or any other type of bias or wrongdoing by the jury. | |to intimidate or threaten to harm a juror. | | |Prosecution and defence "challenges" correct the problems caused by |Jury vetting is against the principle of random selection. | |random selection.…

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Justice is a term that people use to describe as an act or behavior that represents the good people present to others and themselves. It serves as a moral high ground that people strive to be, although sometimes these thoughts can be twisted into its opposite and cause pain, anger, and other negative emotions and acts arise within people. This pain erupts into what is known as injustice and is the epitome of what people should not strive for due it bringing so much negativity. It is a moral choice that no one what’s to make due to the label that it puts on them making them into monsters in the eyes of others due to what they believe could have been done. Although, in some cases, injustice is sometimes the best choice in the matter if one is…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays