Jeremy Bentham's Theory Of Utilitarianism

Great Essays
For years contemporary philosophers have contemplated the implication of a political philosophy known as Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a concept that can be encapsulated by both of its unique tenets, ecstasy and consequentialism. When I speak of ecstasy, I am referring to the notion of nearly complete happiness. The word ‘Ecstasy’ seems to convey a stronger meaning of the concept of happiness. So, from here on I shall use the word ‘Ecstasy’ when referent to happiness. When I speak of consequentialism, I mean to quote a particular class within normative ethical theory by which maintains that the consequences of one’s conduct are ultimately the basis for unbiased judgment about the rightness or wrongness of one’s conduct. Within the political …show more content…
It was not until 1769 that Bentham found purpose in his life and began toying with his version of what he understood as utility. It was during this year that Bentham was inspired by such philosophers such as Hume, Hartley, Priestly and their radical philosophical views as well as their political views. Bentham drew various elements from such thinkers as these to construct his principle of utility. It was not until the late 1770s-80s that Bentham began to develop his notion of science of legislation, this of course was founded upon his principle of …show more content…
Mill believed that human nature was progressive. Mill himself described his philosophical background as one inspired by “Benthamism”. Following a mental catastrophe in 1826, Mill’s transitional period began shortly thereafter. During this time, Mill described himself as becoming more open minded and admitted that he had taken a more cynical outlook on his utilitarian inheritance. From Mill’s observations of Wordsworth and poetry, Mill saw that intellect and emotion should not be left to the odds, He believed that fact should be the intention of both. Mill’s proper description of utility can be viewed as one that fits the type of conventional Benthamism, in it that its account for happiness (ecstasy) is equivalent to pleasure, as well as the absence of pain. Mill wills two goals in which he attempts to accomplish, both the criticism of utilitarianism as it is popularly defined, and likewise the defense of the concept listed above. Mill believed that the general happiness is the fundamental end of action, he too believed that all ration as well as unbiased people would maintain this view. According to Mill all things that retain value, both in the physical realm as well as the psychological realm, should be seen as components of happiness (ecstasy). Virtue, Mill thought, could be seen as the means to an indefinite end. Justice plays a big role in Mill’s position on the concept

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For John Stewart Mill, the resolution of the case study considers the outcome of the moral decision and involves the weight of pain against pleasure, calculus, and a consideration to higher, elite pleasures. Mill’s utilitarianism is supported and influenced by Jeremy Bentham’s philosophy, both of which call for the weighing of the pleasures of an action against the pains of those actions. Furthermore, in making a moral decision, one should use calculus by simply taking a vote of the polis and adhering to the greatest good for the greatest amount of people, known as the “common good.” Here, humans may sacrifice their wants and self-interests for the common good since utilitarianism obeys to a non-egoistic approach. Additionally, Mill’s philosophy also states…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Against this doctrine, however, arises another class of objectors, who say that happiness, in any form, cannot be the rational purpose of human life and action; because, in the first place, it is unattainable: and they contemptuously ask, What right hast thou to be happy?” (EEW p.234) Nevertheless, he was willing to prove them wrong and continued to defend utilitarianism. Mill replies that it is an exaggeration to claim that humans cannot experience happiness. He insists that happiness is possible in those who have experienced a few pains in their life and this could be an attainable life for almost everyone if academic and social reputations change for the better to cultivate the proper values.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction: John Stuart Mill, although accepts the Radicals legacy in the utilitarian domain, he adds to and supplements their points of views, especially in the areas of human motivation and the true nature of happiness. When we read through Mill’s approach on happiness, we see how a lot of Radicals’ assumptions are modified, this can be seen in the second chapter of his essay: Utilitarianism. The Proportionality Doctrine is one of the most prominent concepts that emerge from his writing which suggests that actions are “right” when doing them leads to the highest amount of happiness as a lack of pain, and the reverse of this constitutes a “wrong” action. Here, happiness means pleasure which comes with the absence of pain, and unhappiness…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill defines utilitarianism as “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness,” (484) He then begins to explain that happiness is the absence of pain, and pain is the absence of pleasure. He refers to utilitarianism as the Greatest Happiness Principle. Many people that disagreed with Mill’s definition of utilitarianism insulted his work by stating it as a “doctrine worthy only of swine,” (Mill 485). Mill responds to this attack by stating “...for if the sources of pleasure were precisely the same to human beings and to swine, the rule of which is good enough for the one would be good enough for the other,” (Mill 485). Mill responds to this insult by comparing human…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Together the theory of value and consequentialism make the principle of theory. This says “pleasure and freedom from pain are the only the only things desirable as ends” -that is they are the only intrinsic goods. Intrinsic goods are thought to be sought for its own sake not for the sake of what it leads to. Mill argues pleasure and pain are the only thing worth seeking for their own sake.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through Mill’s view on Utilitarianism there emerges a core moral theory called the greatest happiness principle. However, I believe that Mill’s Greatest Happiness Principle is false. I believe this because after examining his theory I noticed several flaws within his theory. Before I say what is wrong with Mill’s argument and theory I want to address the definition of the greatest happiness principle and what all it encompasses. Mill believes that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, [and] wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill,97).…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Baby Boundaries Case Study

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to John Stuart Mill, utilitarianism is mostly defined by ones actions being guided in the direction of their own happiness. If it makes one happy, then it is morally the right thing to do. Now, we must look at how Mill defines happiness. He says that happiness is, “Pleasure in the absence of pain.” This was a profound discussion we had towards the beginning of class.…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill tells us in his Autobiography that the “little work with the name” Utilitarianism arose from unpublished material, the greater part of which he completed in the final years of his marriage to Harriet Taylor, that is, before 1858. For its publication he brought old manuscripts into form and added some new material. The work first appeared in 1861 as a series of three articles for Fraser’s Magazine, a journal that, though directed at an educated audience, was by no means a philosophical organ. Mill planned from the beginning a separate book publication, which came to light in 1863.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In efforts to find summum bonum or the ultimate good, philosophers during the 20th century began to investigate ethical issues, and tried to create their own versions of an ideal moral code. During this time, John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer base their ethical beliefs in the philosophy of utilitarianism. Both Mill’s essay Utilitarianism and Singer’s work Famine, Affluence and Morality explore the pursuit of happiness and its relation to moral philosophy. The doctrine of utilitarianism emphasizes the consequences of one’s actions as they add to the sum total of happiness.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Bentham's Principle of Utility: (1) recognizes the fundamental role of pain and pleasure in human life, (2) approves or disapproves…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill demonstrate two contrasting moral theories. The philosophers have very different ideas about ethics and happiness. Immanuel Kant, author of “Duty and Reason”, believed in the morality of the good will and duty. According to Kant, happiness is an emotion unable to be controlled while motive is controllable; therefore, duty is the most important aspect of leading a moral life.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jeremy Bentham (1749-1832) was an English political philosopher and legal reformer who founded the theory of utilitarianism in An Introduction of Principles and Moral Legislation in 1789. Utilitarianism is a teleological theory derived from the Greek term telos, meaning ‘end’ or ‘goal’ because it holds that the final consequence of an action determines its moral validity, regardless of whether the nature of that intention. Bentham began with his definition of human nature, proclaiming that “human beings are under governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure”. We invariably seek pleasure and avoid pain wherein these antagonistic forces ultimately determine everything we do and what we ought to do. Bentham contended that happiness…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Through spring-boarding off opponent’s arguments, Mill defines the utilitarian vocabulary and fortifies his theory of morality. Mill begins by first defining “utility” in a way that holds the word neutral from belief that it is opposed to or based solely on pleasure. He defines utility as “not something to be contradistinguished from pleasure, but pleasure itself, together with…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosopher John Stuart Mill argues with Bentham interpretation by introducing his levels of…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays