The hunter - gatherer food chain can be defined as the oldest type of food chain there is. It´s hardly a chain at all really. Hunter gatherers ate better , grew taller , lived longer and were healthier than “ civilized ¨ people. This means that if you like living and you want to be healthy than you should hunt and gather to do better in life. This is a good piece of evidence because it persuades the reader to believe that hunting and gathering your food will help you in the long run.
Secondly , hunter-gatherer food chain is very healthy and good for our environment , while other chains use bad chemical to “help¨ animals . “ the biggest controversy centers around taking antibiotics that are used to treat human illnesses and administering them to feed animals.” This means that farmers outside the hunter-gatherer are not treating our animals with care and that you have to …show more content…
“To harvest mushrooms , people keep track of when they are ready and then search the forest.’’ This means that hunting is not available for people who live in areas like new york and chicago because it's not a lot of farming places. This evidence matters because the hunter gatherer food chain is not something. However , people who argue that hunter gatherer food chain is not are uneducated on the chain and going based on assumptions they have made in the best. People say that local sustainable is the best food chain because you could easily access it in a city environment but he chain is bad for animals and america whereas the hunter gatherer food chain helping america even though in some area sit is not