How Does Descartes Prove God's Existence

Superior Essays
In Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes introduces us to his philosophies by taking everything he thinks he knows, and destroying it. He decides to rebuild his knowledge of the absolute truth by tearing down all of his prior knowledge of the mind and soul, God, and the senses. Throughout this essay, I will discuss Descartes’s two arguments that prove God’s existence, and then I will analyze them. And finally, I will bring up a criticism from Kant, as well as exploring some criticisms of my own. In “Meditation 3”, Descartes introduces the reader to his ideas of God. He wants to know whether God is a deceiver, or better yet, if there is even a God to begin with. He muses with the idea that exploring God’s deceptive nature is necessary to his search for the truth. If there is a God, and he is a deceiver, then how could Descartes know anything with complete certainty? Using a deductive argument, Descartes explains that since God is perfect and has no imperfections, and deception is seen as an imperfection, therefore God cannot be a deceiver. These thoughts are somewhat echoed in …show more content…
He turns the reader’s attention to the idea of material things and their properties. He starts by introducing different properties of material objects such as size, shape, position etc. However he also considers the fact that geometrical objects do not exist in the material world, yet they have properties. For example, triangles have distinct properties that make it a triangle. Triangles have an essence that doesn’t depend on Descartes’ own mind. He also denies that he was introduced to triangles by the senses, because he can think of other shapes that he has never seen and identify their properties as clearly as he can with those of triangles. The triangle exists as an idea in Descartes’ mind because it has a set of properties that he can clearly and distinctly

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Descartes’ second meditation, he offers up an argument for Defective Nature Doubt that brings forth the idea that we can’t be certain of anything we perceive being actual and real (153). Descartes thinks that there is a possibility that we are constantly being deceived due to the fact that we don’t know, with perfect certainty, where our ideas originate from (154). He tries to describe a method in order to dispel this Defective Nature Doubt by giving an argument for the existence of God. I think that the argument he gives for the existence of God is valid, yet I find it to be unsound due to the fact that a few of his premises are can easily be doubted. In order to express this opinion, I will first provide explanations of the premises and…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people today try and find ways to explain how God exists, and that is no different from when Rene Descartes was alive. Rene Descartes was born in France but later moved to Holland where free thought was tolerated. One night, to avoid the cold, Descartes locked himself in an oven where he had a series of revelations which he claimed came from God. In this paper, I will discuss Descartes argument for Gods existence.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes explains that he is able to understand and imagine a three sided triangle. He understands that a triangle is three sided and further and he can also imagine the three sided figure in his mind's eye. Yet, when Descartes hears of a chiliagon, he can understand that the chiliagon has one thousand sides but when he tries to picture this image in his imagination he can not. This begins to show the weakness of the imagination. Therefore, this leads Descartes to believe that the imagination can not be the only hallmark of his mind because he now knows that he continues to exist even when he is unable to imagine something.…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He states that his ideas that he hasn’t say out loud yet exist just in his mind but those count as existing already. His example is the triangle. He states that in real life triangles don’t exist but material things with the shape of a triangle do exist. But he states that the triangle exists by itself because even if he tries to change its properties with his mind he can’t. Descartes points out the fact that the triangle was invented because of the things that have its shape.…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He instead uses these points to show a bigger truth that nothing can be proven with our senses. How can one prove that anything around them is real? Without senses and the knowledge people have been taught over time, there is no way to prove the life around them is real. Descartes argues that nothing is certain without knowledge to back it up. At a time when most philosophers used God to back their…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Therefore, in this essay, I will be looking into the process of two philosopher’s arguments and comparing them. In addition, I will reveal that Locke’s argument against Innateness of the idea of God could be questionable based on his theory of obtaining true knowledge and idea. Rene Descartes asserts the principle of innate idea in the one of his philosophical treatise named “Meditations on First…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Meditations of First Philosophy, Descartes explains philosophical meditations written over six days. The Second Meditation concerns the nature of the human mind. Descartes argues that the human mind is better known than the body. A major claim of his is his most famous quote “I think, therefore I am,” meaning a thinking thing, such as himself, can exist. In this essay, I will prove that Descartes’ argument in the Second Meditation for his existence as a thinking thing is convincing.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At the beginning of his fourth meditation, Descartes begins reflecting on the three main certainties that he has developed so far: 1) that God exists, 2) that God is not a deceiver, and 3) that God created him and is therefore responsible for all his faculties, including his faculty of judgment. Descartes seems satisfied with the first two convictions, however, he begins to explore the conflict that arises with the third; that, “if everything that is in me comes from God, and he did not endow me with a faculty for making mistakes, it appears that I can never go wrong” (Descartes and Cottingham 38). This dilemma, also known as the “Problem of Error”, prompts the need for Descartes to reconcile the two, seemingly contradictory positions. While…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes Material World

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Descartes’ view on the material world begins with him defining himself as a thinking substance and God as a perfect substance. Without any real justification, while in the process of thinking, there are a variety of different modes working. If he could not say that thinking things exist, then how could he say in what form thinking things exist if had suspended belief in everything? He was unsure. Continued by stating that the mind, the soul, and man’s entirety, merely uses the body, so it can continue to exist without it.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Position Descartes believes in what is called “substance dualism”. Substance dualism means trusting in the viewpoint that substances come in both physical and immaterial forms. He believed that the…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Descartes “Evil Deceiver” argument he argues that an evil demon is the source of our deception rather than an omnipotent God. The strongest argument that Descartes presents is the idea that our senses cannot be trusted as the world around us and everything we experience is a constructed illusion. In this paper, I will argue that this argument can be seen as sound as our senses can not be trusted because they are unreliable. In “Meditation I: What Can be Called Into Doubt” Descartes explains to us that the information we are receiving through our senses isn’t inherently accurate.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    From this quote he developed his reasoning for the existence of God. Throughout his research he discovered two trademark arguments for the existence of God. Descartes formed an ideology that God is perfect, and could never deceive us. This essay will be exploring the importance of God in the creation of life, how we use our…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays