How Does Antony Use Emotional Appeals In Julius Caesar

Improved Essays
Rylee Sellitto
Ms. Heaton
RL 1 English 10
November 4th, 2015
Effectiveness From Logical and Emotional Appeal Have you ever noticed the differences between two speeches by listening to how each persuades the audience with their words? In the tragedy Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar gets stabbed in the back by the conspirators and dies. After his death, both Brutus and Antony give a speech to the people of Rome, expressing their logic and emotion behind Caesar’s assassination. Antony’s use of logical and emotional appeals swayed the Romans and proved his speech more effective than Brutus’s. Both Brutus and Antony used logical and emotional appeals throughout their speeches that helped persuade the Romans’ thoughts
…show more content…
All throughout Brutus’s speech he made the point directly and indirectly that he killed Caesar for the people. He rose against Caesar because it wasn’t that “I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more” in which proclaimed the reasoning for killing Caesar (3.2.23-24). By revealing these words, Brutus is providing logical reasoning behind his actions. He didn’t just killed Caesar for himself but for the good of the people. The Romans praised Brutus for his actions and declared him their hero because to the Romans, they think Brutus saved them from Caesar. This was an effective part of Brutus’s speech however, Antony’s emotion will effect the people more. In contrast to Brutus, Antony used a lot of emotional appeals towards the Romans. In one way, Antony points out the people that before Brutus killed Caesar they didn’t have any problems with Caesar’s ways of ruling. The Romans “all did love him once” because Caesar did no wrong to the people …show more content…
But, Antony’s speech was more effective because he connected to the Romans more by using strong logical and emotional appeals. He was able to touch the Romans’ hearts with his emotion and persuade their thoughts with his logic. The emotional appeals also added a sensitive feeling to the people for the loss of Caesar. Throughout Antony’s speech, he was able to demonstrate the true meaning of friendship towards Caesar by sticking by his side, even through his death. Through his strong use of mainly emotional appeals but also logic, Antony won over the Romans and turned them against

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s speech was based on the use of pathos. He mentioned the will of Caesar but then told the people, “It is not meet you know how Caesar loved you” (Anderson 840). The people did not realize that he was manipulating them into demanding to hear the will. His speech was filled with emotional appeals and veiled calls to action such as this. At one point in his speech, he crooned, “Good friends, sweet friends, let me not stir you up to such a sudden flood of mutiny” (Anderson 838).…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony's use of the three forms of persuasion was more effective than Brutus's. Antony's use of ethos, pathos, and logos is able to convince the people that he is correct. Brutus manages to convince people shortly in his speech that he is right, but in the end Antony wins. In the beginning of Brutus's speech he states "Believe me for mine honor, and have respect to mine honor that you may believe. "(III:14-15).…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony later claims, shortly before reading Caesar’s generous will, that he “must not read it”, as it was not for the Roman citizens to “know how Caesar loved you.” While the people of Italy are not described as especially dense, it appears that they are easily influenced in their judgement. Simply by using adverse phrasing in tempting to the citizens, he deeply affects the listeners and deters them from their original devotion to Brutus. Evidently, he was successful in this, as Antony was able to quickly and decisively clout the Romans’ judgement with poignancy, pathos, and emotional coaxing. As Mark Antony states, “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar……

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brutus on the other hand, uses only facts which doesn’t give much credibility and there is no bond between him and the crowd. Antony’s precise word choice allows him to even combine pathos and ethos in one phrase. For example, towards the end of the funeral speech, Antony says “But yesterday the word of Caesar might have stood against the world: now he lies there.” Antony appeals to the empathy of the crowd by making them feel sad about his death, especially when he says “now he lies there”. He also shows Caesar was morally good because Caesar was willing to stand against the world just for…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony delivered a more effective speech than Brutus by using many rhetorical devices including irony, pathos, . By making his speech emotional and manipulative, Antony convinces the people of Rome to avenge Caesar's death with him. In their speeches, both Brutus and Antony use irony to appeal to the people’s emotions and convince them of different beliefs. One example of irony in Brutus’s speech is in the lines “Who is here so vile…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although people generally believe they are persuaded by ideas that they have discovered, William Shakespeare’s historic tragedy, Julius Caesar illustrates that an individual’s thoughts are inevitably shaped by external factors. Persuasion and suggestion are rhetorical skills that play central roles in Julius Caesar, but they also demonstrates how individuals bend towards words they want to hear when faced with a difficult situation. The play cautions the dangers and powers of rhetoric as a tool for manipulation and reminds us how easily and completely an audience can be both won and lost in terms of persuasion. In the few early scenes we are able to see Cassius promoting his own views upon Brutus.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus only aims to be heard, not to be loved, however Antony wants acceptance, and passion for his cause. As Mark Antony receives the crowds acceptance, he also attempts to receive acceptance from his ‘friends’ on Caesar’s behalf. Antony uses pathos once again when trying to convince the people of how much love Caesar had for them. He states on Line 91 of Scene ii “when that the poor hath cried, Caesar hath wept” (III). Antony’s vigorous use of the word ‘wept’ reiterates Caesar’s deep care for his people.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To explain, Antony finally returned to the topic of the will. The only reason he got off the topic was so that he had time to talk about the conspirators in a negative way. This quote shows how in the next couple lines, Antony will read Caesar’s will to the crowd, saying that they have gained seventy five drachmas and Caesar’s private arbors. The persuasive technique of Pathos was used here as well because this shows that Caesar considered the people of Rome family, which made them very emotional and excited because being family with Caesar meant so much to them. By showing the common people of Rome Caesar’s will, Antony created a whirlwind of emotions throughout the…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Knowing he had to sway the crowd to believe his opinion, Antony had to discreetly show the crowd that conspirators were not heroes, but murderers. Using different forms of persuasion, Antony was able to achieve his goal of turing the sympathy to people now had for Brutus, over the Caesar once again. In order to persuade the people to not have sympathy for the Conspirators, Antony showed them Caesar’s will, repetitively said the word “honorable”, and showed them Caesar’s…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Once they do however, Antony 's speech becomes much more interesting. Each seemingly complimentary statement about Brutus and the others becomes a disguised insult. Every kind word is another jab. This is another tactic used by Antony to dance around Brutus 's demands, and one that works…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony was able to convince the crowd to do what he wanted by conjuring their emotions. He was also able to gain power over the plebeians because they were followers. In addition, Antony’s speech was successful because he made the crowd feel pity as well as guilt for betraying Caesar. Furthermore, it made them feel anger towards the conspirators for killing Caesar and sympathy for Antony because he showed his emotions. Antony’s speech is one for many generations to uses as a model for persuasive speaking, as it uses genuine emotions to persuade the…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whether public speeches result from those such as Adolf Hitler or Martin Luther King, Jr., their remarkable ability to ignite the population persuades people to take up arms regardless of the cause. In the midst of Act III in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony both speak to the bewildered citizenry regarding Caesar’s demise. Resulting from a handful of conspirators assassinating him in the Senate, Caesar’s death sparks chaos which demands explanation. Thus, some individuals assert Brutus’ speech over Antony’s by claiming that Brutus’ effect and ability to direct his point sooner propel him higher than Antony. Unfortunately, this argument fails to acknowledge Antony’s mightier impact on the audience and his employment of a larger…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony has to slowly plant doubt and anxiety that perhaps Brutus was wrong; that although he is a good and honorable man, Brutus could have just murdered another good man, who was only doing good for Rome. Antony uses his words to manipulate the people’s minds much better than Brutus did. The people know that Antony was Caesar’s good friend and the good things he is saying about Caesar are credible. Since Antony is changing the crowd’s perspective about who Caesar was, his continuous good remarks about Brutus keep them from getting angry and…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before Antony’s speech, the crowd calls the deceased Caesars names and acknowledge Brutus as if he was their savior. Brutus ask the crowding a very common-sensed question whether if they didn’t loved Rome and freedom, majority of the crowd answered no. Immediately after the crowd answered the risky question Caesar had to be immediately killed. What Antony did for his own good and maybe others explained that he is a calm man who allows common sense to answer his questions and others as well. Antony does not seek action with resisting Caesar’s murder but his words spoke a bit louder if he were to act on the situation.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays