They represent large number of individual and they often get success in influencing law makers to consider their concerns. Whereas Lobbyists are the experts in certain field and they tend to influence legislators in their decision making by providing some information that the legislators have no idea about relating to certain bills. They also have very strong ability to form relationship with law makers through certain steps such has food, beverage and entertainment. They first tend to engage with lawmakers and form bonds which help them to gain trust and makes them able to influence the decision-making process very often. Interest groups, on the other hand, play …show more content…
With that sum of money, they have the ability to gather experts and experienced lobbyists around them. Lobbyist use money to spend on food, beverage and entertainment for legislators. With the amount of time they spend with the legislators, lobbyist try to slip their main issues during their conversation and pursue the legislators to decide on their favor. So, with huge sum of money, they can spend money on more legislators which will eventually help the interest groups to succeed on their many bills they want to introduce. Such a great influence of interest groups strikes down the opportunity of individuals to state their concerns and I show their presence in politics. They get completely erased. Therefore, government need to limit the interest group’s use of their funds and drop the amount of money they can spend on legislators to $60 - $ 80 a day. It would help the system to limit lobbying and give a chance for individuals to present their concerns in the platform. 1 In the current time, I believe the collective influence of interest group override the individuals ability to influence