How Did The Roman Constitution Influence The Federal Government

Improved Essays
The founders were influenced both positively and negatively by the past governments of their time by forging a negative constitution that limits government interference. The founders were ruled by King Georg’s forceful hand, and that directly influenced how they viewed governmental power. Our constitution constantly built parameters that stopped the federal government from growing too large. For example our constitution has checks and balances which was a system that allowed the federalists to give more power to the federal government while ensuring it could not be taken advantage of. The were a way for the government to check itself, and prohibit one branch from monopolizing the power. The Roman Republic was a government that influenced our …show more content…
Our founders distrusted direct democracy, and prefered a representative form of government because direct democracy gives too much power to the majority; ensuring that the general will, will always prevail. Even The Articles of confederation, a form of government that favored general will over the federal government so much so the federal government had so little power, it couldn't even get the states to pay their war debts, was not a direct democracy. England was a representative government as well, but they represented the people by social class; our founders did not agree that this was a fair and just way of governing. SImilar to England to vote in america one had to qualify; you had to be a white male who owned land. Unlike england; land was fairly easy to acquire in America, so around seventy percent of the white population could vote. The founders did not want a “mob rule” because they wanted the people to have a voice, but many of the citizens were uneducated; making it imperative that the people had a representative that was devoted to the issues at

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution created a just government by fixing the many problems with the Articles of Confederation. In Alexander Hamilton’s letter to James Duane he stated that “the confederation itself is defective and requires to be altered; it is neither fit for war, nor peace”. One problem with the confederation was that too much power was given to the states. Alexander Hamilton wrote a letter to James Duane stating that the “Confederation too gives the power of the purse too entirely to the state legislatures”. With the states having too much power, the federal government was very weak and inefficient.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Founding Fathers of the United States of America wanted a strong and central government that could function properly during wartime and was able define its republic character. In March 1, 1891, the Articles of Confederation were ratified by the states and was in effect. However, the under the Articles of Confederation, James Madison noticed that the country was broke not in economical means but in its structure. In 1788, the Constitution of the United States was ratified. It established a strong national government and its fundamental laws and rights that are still in effect in today's society.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the formation of the U.S. government, two different forms of government were initiated. At first, the Americans wanted to form a government that was nothing like monarchy, as they didn’t want a repeat of King George. The Articles of Confederation served as the first constitution of the United States, which was ratified in 1781. However, the Articles of Confederation had issues. The main issue was that the national government was too weak.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Founding Fathers knew they wanted their leader to have limited power. These delegates did not believe the common people would have enough knowledge to make a good decision, therefore they did not believe that the president and vice president should be elected by direct popular vote. With many other possibilities the delegates at this meeting settled on the Electoral College system. Each state has one electoral vote for each of the senators and representatives in their state making this politically equal representation. The way this works come election day, the common people…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Colonial America Dbq

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During Colonial America, Democracy was a work in progress with many democratic and undemocratic features. Most of the undemocratic features have been fixed over the years since america started. Back then not everyone was treated equal and not everyone had the same rights. Some were more unlucky than others.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From their conception and drafting in 1776, the Articles of Confederation were nothing but a reaction to the English government. When possible, the colonists continually strived to do the exact opposite of what the English government would. This effort to avoid tyranny resulted in a decentralized, weak, inefficient, and financially poor government, one that was also nigh impossible to change and amend. Not only did this later spur reform, but it also gave impetus to “those who favored a strong central government” (persons such as Alexander Hamilton).…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It was named the Electoral college. The Electoral College was created for a few reasons. The first purpose was to create a buffer between population and the selection of a President. At the time, the founding fathers were worried of a tyrant like ruler who could manipulate public opinion in a direct election. They didn't trust citizens and wanted to leave it to a group of trusted politicians.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should the electoral college be abolished? To answer the question of rather or not to abolish the electoral college one must first understand the basis of how it works and how it is made. The history of the electoral college and how it came about is needed before deciding which side to choose. The electoral college was made to protect separation of powers over the government and as a country we have advanced past the need for protection of power.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First off, some really big issues was how the colonist had a high tax cost but they had low currency. Consequently, the colonist would have no money after taxes which is why so many colonist started to protest against the government. the government were not able to pay the soldiers because the colonist wouldn’t pay their taxes. Furthermore, the colonist were even able to refuse anything the government asked them to do. However, the main reason the colonist didn’t pay their taxes was because they couldn’t even afford it so they would either hide the money or just beat up the tax collector.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electoral Problems

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When it came to drafting the Constitution, the Framers had different options and ideas of the ways to select a president and the Electoral College seemed to fit their society well. After all, politics in 1787 was different than what it has come to be in this time. During that time, there were only 13 colonies, which are states, all of which were located on the Atlantic border. This made “national campaigns... impractical...”, because transportation and communication wasn’t well built between colonies (Kimberling 1). The founders also believed that “State loyalties could trump the best interests of a national government” which would make it difficult to elect a candidate with a national influence and that it would be difficult to elect a candidate…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Spanish American War Dbq

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Contrary to popular belief in America, the framers of the constitution did not establish a democratic system of government. The utmost that can be said is the framers established a government of, by, and for white males who owned a fairly substantial amount of property. Blacks and Indians were excluded from participation, as well as all women. It was not until the reforms of the Jacksonian Era, during the 1820’s and 1830’s that the states removed property qualifications for voting and holding public office.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While larger states desired representation based on population in order to have more power, smaller, less populous states wanted equal representation so that they would not be ruled by the majority. By establishing a bicameral legislature, the founding fathers ensured that the law making process was contemplative and not based on passionate public opinion, thereby preventing majority rule. The judicial review, the power of the Supreme Court to declare acts passed by Congress unconstitutional, also limited the power of the majority as it had the power to override the decision made by a majority in Congress as unconstitutional and prevent a bill from becoming a law. While the framers wished to observe the principle of the peoples’ will, they understood the downfalls of a direct democracy. By creating an Electoral College system, a bicameral legislature and the judicial review process, the…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should the Electoral College be abolished? America has used the electoral college for centuries now and maybe it’s time we question whether it’s the right way to elect our nation’s president. Both sides have great points, but ultimately keeping the Electoral College is the right thing to do.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Roman Republic The Roman Constitution had three elements, each of them owned individualistic powers, and each of them shared their power so well that they didn’t know what to say if whether the constitution is an aristocracy, democracy, or tyranny. The Consuls known as “magistrates” advantaged the military and are the ultimate masters of the government. The Senate proposed laws and had the control of the money and other valuable things. The constitution made a list or categories of who could vote and who could not.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Republic was in control of many regions and not all of these inhabitants were delighted with the current circumstances, especially the citizens in Rome. During the period of the expansion of Rome, the government was becoming less democratic and started displaying signs of an oligarchy. The Senate of the Roman Republic was the prime branch of government. This was comprised of leaders from the patricians, the noble, and wealthy families of ancient Rome. Members of the senate were not elected but were chosen by the Consuls.2 The senate’s main task was to direct spending and verdicts associating with foreign powers.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays