How Did Alexander II Lead To The Downfall Of The Tsardom

Superior Essays
The introduction of industrialism into Russia was not a wise move for the survival of the Tsardom because it eventually led to the end of the tsar, but it was a wise move for Russia. Alexander II, the Russian Tsar from 1855 to 1881, introduced the beginnings of industrialization into Russia. Although the reforms that Alexander made were small, they will spark the rise of the third greatest industrial power in the World. This was a great move for bettering Russia, but will lead to the downfall of the tsar because of the inevitable opposition towards future tsars. Opposition was created during the emancipation of the surfs, universal military conscription, and the creation of a new judicial system. All seemed great on the surface, but proved to create hatred and opposition towards the tsar from all social classes. Although a lot of the reforms that Alexander made bettered Russia, they were not wise for the survival of the tsar, and led to the fall of the tsardom under Nicholas II.
Russia was one of the last European “powerhouses” to even think about industrializing, and it was not until a devastating loss that Alexander
…show more content…
After the devastating, embarrassing loss of the Crimean war, Alexander realized he needed to do something to improve his army. The old army was composed of serf recruits, and now that serfs were emancipated Alexander needed a new way to build a successful army. January 1, 1874 Alexander introduced the universal draft. This ended only tax paying estates, that being the peasants and the bourgeoisie, to be apart of the army. Conscription was another reform that included equality of all estates. Now every social class had to serve in Russia’s army. The military reforms not only included conscription but an outlaw on corporal punishment. This meant peasants and the middle class men who participated in the military could no longer be physically

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    US Honors Pre-WWI

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The news of defeat was unexpected in Russia. There was social unrest, a hatred shown to the military and economic disruption. The revolution of 1905, which included protests from liberals, socialists, workers, peasants, ethnic minorities and even some soldiers and sailors, forced the Tsar of Russia to grant Russia’s first parliament. The Tsar reluctantly granted an elected legislative assembly during the 1905 Russian Revolution.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter The Great Decrees

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    And having fully learned these skills, they were directed to return home and be “assigned soldiers, one soldier per returnee”,” to teach them what they had learned abroad.” “Decree on Western Dress”, which was aimed at “creating a new Russian.” With the exception of “clergy and peasant tillers of soil”, people were to no longer wear “Russian dress…sheepskin coats, or Russian peasant coats, trousers, boots or shoes.” Instead, men were to wear clothing “of a German type”, such as “waistcoat, trousers, boots, shoes and hats” and the women “Western dresses, hats, jackets and underwear.” “Decree on Shaving” which said that “all…must shave their beards and mustaches” but if some did not then “a yearly tax” would be “collected from such…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He improved the Army and helped create Russia’s first Navy. During this time period the iron industry in Russia increased as did the munition production, meaning Russia did not have to depend on the west anymore for weapon productions. He also introduced new church-state control, a reformed tax system, and western dress. He also helped bring…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It triggered peasants to take a strong stand against landlords. In 1905 Russian government suffered decline of in fear and lost respect to its authority. The Russian working class was no longer an unorganized mass, restive but irresolute, in some ways hostile to all the ideas of political change. Rather, it became an organized group that moved slowly in the direction of the liberation movement.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the period 1855 – 1956 Russia was involved in many major wars, all of which played an important role in its development. With the exception of the Second World War many of the wars Russia was involved led to defeats for them and these defeats exposed the weakness of the Tsar or government in charge. War outlined the flaws in the presiding system and highlighted Russia’s faults, and thus placed a spotlight upon the shortcomings of the Russian leadership. Such pressure prompted the Tsars and other leaders to react and change in order to appease a nation on the brink of an oncoming revolution therefore Trotsky’s statement that ‘war was a locomotive of Russian history’ is true as it led to significant changes such as the Emancipation of the Serfs and the Abdication of Tsar Nicholas.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Imperial Russia continued to expand, Serfdom took its place as a commonality in Russian culture. While social classes grew more and more apart, peasants were hit with the harsh reality of this class separation. As Kizhanich mentions in the source book; Medieval Russia, “in the middle of the fifteenth century, conditions of Russian peasants deteriorated rapidly. By the early seventeenth century the majority had become serfs of one kind to another.” Serfs did not live the best life, this can be seen in Alexander Pushkin’s The Captain’s Daughter, a story of a young Russian noble who ends up in the middle of the Pugachev rebellion fighting for his life .…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The emancipation of serfs would seem, to the other western powers, that the Tsar is doing good for his people and abolishing a morally incorrect system. At the same time it would help maintain the autocracy in Russia following the social unrest and growing economic problems which could be fixed by the emancipation. Additionally, serfdom was not entirely different to the feudalism which had been present in many areas of pre-modern Europe, although long abolished. The fact that Russia still had serfdom when other western countries had long moved on past feudalism showed Russia’s backwardness…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Autocracy In Russia Essay

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A crisis of modernization was one of the many reasons that caused the collapse of the autocracy in Russia, and the first step to allowing Lenin and the Bolshevik party to eventually gain control of the state. In the 19th century, Russia was one of the largest and most backward states on the European continent. The peasants of the country remained serfs until the mid-1800s, and even when they gained their freedom, they were enslaved to debt and redemption payments to their landlords that they would never be able to pay back. When they gained their freedom and were given small plots of land, the legal ties peasants did have to the states were weakened as nobles enhanced their own rights. This left peasants feeling even more detached from their…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The humiliation of the Crimean War had greatly exposed Russia's main problems, involving its lack of communication; problems within industry; the useless military; and a corrupt, ineffective administration. The defeat acted as proof of Russia's backwardness compared to other western powers. Alexander II needed to act effectively. The first reform…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although many of Alexander II’s reforms appeared liberal in nature, most of them did not turn out so in practice and were simply initiated to promote stability in the Russian Empire. Furthermore, Alexander II was reluctant to relinquish his absolute power. Combined with the fact that he displayed traits of an autocrat from time to time, particularly after an assassination attempt in 1866, these reasons make ‘Tsar Liberator’ an unsuitable title for him. Instead, a better term to describe Alexander II would be a ‘reforming autocrat.’ While, in many cases, he was genuine in his pursuit of reform, his intentions remained rooted to the perpetuation of the Tsarist autocracy.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people around the world are aware who Alexander The Great was, but few are familiar with his story. Alexander The Great is considered to be one of the most successful leaders in history. With his philosophical intellect and his ruthless ways, he conquered nations others failed to conquer. Alexander the Great was a genius and a great military leader.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ill-fated by the Khodynka Tragedy, the reign of the last Tsar was plagued with public discontent from his inauguration. Nicholas’ fear that he was “not prepared to be Tsar” caused him to cling to the outdated social and economic rhetoric of his father, Tsar Alexander III, despite the rapidly changing and evolving state of Russia. By 1905, many of the classes, particularly the peasants, urban workers and the reformist middle class were angered and politicized by Nicholas’ reactionary policies. The events of 1905 were preceded by a Progressive and academic agitation for more political democracy and limits to Tsarist rule in Russia. Nicholas II caused grievances for almost every class of people under his protection, to the extent that the gentry…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The revolutions in Russia during 1917, particularly the February Revolution, 'grew out of prewar political and economic instability, technological backwardness, and fundamental social divisions, coupled with gross mismanagement of the war effort, continuing military defeats' and the inadequacy of the Tsar and his government. However, whilst it was these factors combined that resulted in the Russian Revolution, the primary factor…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the opinion of George Buchanan, British ambassador to St Petersburg from 1910, “The emperor Nicholas was one of the most pathetic figures in history, he was so unfitted for the role and never really governed Russia.” The industrial revolution throughout russia had just been started at the time of the First World War, this is partly to blame for the fall of the Romanov Dynasty. Due to late industrialisation, the economy of russia was very weak, leading to there being no way for russia to provide for its people, soldiers and even war supplies. The russian army was even left with ridiculous supplies, many soldiers fighting barefoot and without weapons.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Political: Russia was being ruled by an absolute and despotic monarchy , where the will of the sovereign (great King) considered the law as it was. The king thus had unlimited power; ruled arbitrarily, without giving anyone their acts of sin and respect the freedoms and rights of…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays