Battle Of Houston

Superior Essays
Houston spent three years with the Cherokees before another series of events began to move Houston’s life in a different direction. This shift started when Houston traveled to Washington to protest an unfair deal that had swindled the Cherokees out of valuable land. Houston’s leadership and speaking abilities were proven in Washington when he “spoke his mind to such good effect and proved his case so thoroughly that five of the agents were promptly dismissed” However, soon afterward, Houston found himself in trouble after a disagreement with William Stanberry. The men had argued over how the Indian deal was handled, leading Houston to attack Stanberry. After a long trial, Houston was let off with only a reprimand. This incident did leave Houston …show more content…
Houston’s men “thirsted for vengeance and was wiled to fight, anywhere, anyhow if only it might wreak that vengeance upon an enemy for which it felt a contemptuous hatred” It would have been easy for Houston to lead his men into battle sooner than would have been fortuitous. However, Houston waited until Santa Anna’s troops were at a disadvantage before striking. On April 21, 1836, Houston’s retreat turned into the Battle of San Jacinto. Houston and his men were victorious, even capturing Santa Anna himself. This battle is the event that “forever enshrined [Houston} as a member of the pantheon of Texas heroes and a symbol for the …show more content…
Houston’s victory in the battle created an enthusiasm for him that swept him into the Presidency of Texas by several thousand votes. Although Houston was the decisive winner, his victory came with a host of problems. Texas’s “treasury was empty and the Republic had no credit. The public debt contracted during the Revolution amounted to $1,250,00” Throughout his Presidency, Houston worked to gain recognition of Texas from the US, and to return Santa Anna to Mexico. Houston served as President for two years before he handed the Presidency over to his Vice President, Mirabeau Lamar. During his presidency, Houston “stabilized the currency, secured the safety of the borders, and gained recognition by the United States.” Houston’s leadership skills, it seemed, had finally paid off. However, the Presidency of Houston’s successor was disastrous and Houston returned to the Presidency in 1841. When he returned, Houston was aware of how ire the situation was stating, “We are not only without money but without credit, and for want of punctuality without character….Patriotism, industry, and enterprise are now our only resources apart from our public domain and the precarious revenues of the country”. Houston’s second Presidency once again proved his strong leadership skills, as it revealed his tendency to keep a level head throughout all the challenges of his Presidency. In the end,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    So, on Sleuthing the Alamo, Crisp was trying to save Sam Houston’s reputation by proving that Sam Houston’s speech was incorrect through further research and investigation. By the time Crisp finished his investigation, he made two discoveries about the speech. Houston’s speech is famous through the history because it is showing his racial prejudices against Tejanos (Texas Mexicans). Crisp said, “The words of the speech were harsh. They accused the…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sam Houston was the leader of the battle of San Jacinto. Both of these men were the bravest men on the…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas Independence Dbq

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Pages

    I believe that Texas was justified to declare independence as its own nation. In Texas’s perspective, they were fighting against an oppressor, like the Unites States fighting against the tyrant King George; in this case, General Santa Anna was King George, earning himself the nickname, Napoleon of the West. In his letter, Colonel Seguin wrote, “... they prefered to die a thousand times rather than submit themselves to to the tyrant’s yoke.” Many of the Tejanos and Americans living there opposed the suffocating leadership from the General from their previous lifestyle of being so independent. Santa Anna took away, “...the right of worshipping the Almighty…”, “... demanded that we give up our arms…” , “... failed to establish any public system…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Civil War was the biggest battle in World History between the Union and the Confederate. It was a bloody battle for what they thought was right and what they thought was better for them, but why did Texas fight? Texas fought for the love of the Confederate, States’ Rights, and to preserve slavery. First off, Texas fought for love. Texans loved the way of life they had and all the ways of the south.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He felt that expanding slavery would make most of the population slavery. Distinguishing himself in combat under General Andrew Jackson, young Houston made an important patron. He was elected to two terms in Congress and also elected two terms as governor of Tennessee. Texas declared independence from Mexico on Houston's birthday, March 2, 1836. Houston married Margaret Lea.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Forty Three men have served as the President of the United States. Each man brought his own ideas, philosophies and ambition to the office. Some of the these gentlemen have been credited with changing the presidency and defining the age, while others have been credited with being helplessly defined by the events of the era in which they held the office. History gives reverence to all of the men who served in what is considered the most powerful position not only in the United States, but also in the world. Perhaps history shows us, that it is not about getting elected to the Presidency that should be applauded, but how one handles the social, political, and economic climate, which he inherits.…

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Sam Houston is one of the most widely known individuals throughout history, many do not know his bitter rivalries in the creation of the Republic of Texas. Houston was born on March 2nd, 1863 in Rockbridge County Virginia. As a product of his era, Houston embraced Westward expansion and moved to Tennessee. While the true intentions for Houston’s arrival in Texas are unknown, it is evident he quickly rose within the hierarchy of Texas politics as he was elected to President at two separate times. However, as Williams suggests in his book, Sam Houston: The Life and Times of the Liberator of Texas, an Authentic American Hero that Houston 's temper and a fondness for confidentiality blocked his top political ambitions .…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1845, the Republic of Texas was annexed by the United States. This, I believed to be the primary cause of the war. The problem was that Mexico was opposed to annexation, holding firm that Texas was still part of their territory, even though the Texans had fought and won their independence, ten years prior and had been officially acknowledged as a sovereign nation by the United States, Great Britain, and France.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Houston was not shy when it came to speaking to the Senate. He spoke out about the Oregon territory (142) and actively spoke against the Kansas-Nebraska act and giving all states the right to slavery (159, 162). Although Houston had some critics, he was elected Senator for multiple terms. He finally retired from the Senate in 1859. That same year, Houston was elected the governor of Texas (178).…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Book Review The book “The Presidency of George Washington” by Forest McDonald mostly concentrates on presidential organizations. It talks about how the presidency of George Washington was one of the most significant events in the history of the United States of America. Also, it discusses social factions, national opinionated politics, war debt, and the regulation of the state and federal governments. McDonald, proclaims that, the office of president may have not existed today if not for Washington.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the next few years, the problems continued and people from each side were captured and imprisoned. Although the relationship between Anglo Americans and Mexican officials seemed to be worsening, some of my Anglo American friends believe they had an ally in Mexican General Antonio López de Santa Anna. General López de Santa Anna was a Federalist and had won victories against Centralist troops. Since he promised to follow the Mexican Constitution of 1824, which pleased the Texans, the Texans responded by adopting the Turtle Bay Resolutions.…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As he was reading it he noticed the speech was out of Sam Houston’s character. In his speech Sam Houston would insult the Mexicans by calling them “half-Indians”. James Crisp was thrown off by this due to the fact of his “childhood image of Sam Houston the adopted Cherokee”(page 39). James Crisp says in page 39 “The speech contradicted much of what I thought that I learned in more than two decades of investigating the causes and consequences of the Texas Revolution”. The author was aware that during the mid-nineteenth century people viewed the Texas Revolution as a racial conflict.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his book, Sleuthing The Alamo, James E. Crisp goes beyond the mere description of the historical events that took place during the Texas Revolution. Crisp’s passion to uncover why certain events of the Texas Revolution were remembered in a specific way, propelled him to closely examine and critically analyze the motive behind a number of writers and historians. It was this determination that forced Crisp to take no for an answer and to “attempt to separate Texas myth from Texas history”. What makes Crisp’s book Sleuthing The Alamo so unique, in contrast with most historical books, is that Crisp involves himself in his text in such a way that it becomes very personal to him. Additionally, Crisp doesn’t conceal his own personal biases as…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jacob Ashcraft 24 October 2016 Texas Revolution Was Inevitable In one of the first major scholarly works on the Texas Revolution, historian Eugene C. Barker in 1928 described the conflict as a “clash of cultures.” Barker maintained that Anglo-Texans and Mexicans had little in common and, as a result, concluded that the rebellion could not have been avoided. Barker is correct in his statement about war being inevitable. Some believe it was because the Anglo colonists wanted overrun Texas and break away to become a part of the United States in the venture westward.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He said “ I was stunned and disbelieving. The words seemed so unlike Houston. Part of my reaction, I suppose, could be attributed to nostalgia from my childhood image of Sam Houston, the adopted Cherokee. ”(39) This…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays