Going against this accommodation, a religious non-profit organization called Little Sisters of the Poor argued that the process of exemption should include coverage of a cost-sharing mechanism of such services and not just exception of such services. Moreover, they stated the process of certifying their religious objections violates their religious right under the Religious Freedom …show more content…
Unlike the Supreme Court case of Hobby Lobby, asking for an accommodation for employees to have contraceptive coverage but release the employer from paying for it, Little Sisters of the Poor is requesting for an exemption from the contraceptive coverage rule, meaning their employees would not have contraceptive coverage which violates their religious belief. I think this argument of Little Sisters of Poor is little far beyond the scope, even though I am also against