• Home Page
  • Thomas Hobbes Arguments For The Existence Of A Political State

Thomas Hobbes Arguments For The Existence Of A Political State

Superior Essays
Show More
Introduction
Considering Hobbes argument for “why the existence of a political State is justified,” there are two arguments. One is to defend Hobbes and the other to go against him. This paper has the goal to support why the existence of a political state is justified in the view of Hobbes. This paper is divided into two other sub-arguments. The first part uses Hobbes’ three laws to figure out why a political state is justified. The second argument puts in perspective Hobbes view of the aims of a political state to also show us why having a political state is justified. We will also look at an objection that some may have. The arguments both give us a good amount of insight as to why the political exists and why it is justified.

1. Laws Given by Hobbes
Thomas Hobbes gives us three laws. These laws are: 1) To seek peace if attainable 2) If something furthers peace, the people should …show more content…
The Aim of a Political State
The aim of a political state as presented by Hobbes is to provide all that is needed to satisfy the rational requirement of security and protection. These aims tie into his natural laws. As these are 3 laws that are naturally occurring in the state of nature. These laws ought to be followed because it is the rational thing to do.
An objection may say that, in state of nature since there is nothing just or unjust that people would not have any reason to go towards the idea of a political state and that people would not have to follow covenants although, the three laws help to show us why having a state of nature is not an ideal state. There should be a political state because no rational person would want to be in a state where competition is forever occurring, and death could occur at any moment due to someone wanting what you have. Hobbes uses natural laws, which is a general rule that man is forbidden to do because it is destructive to his life, to justify the being of a strong central

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Meng Tzu Case Study
    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Meng Tzu Case Study

    4) What does Meng tzu mean by “a heart sensitive to the suffering of others?” Why does he claim that this defines our humanity, and why does it need to be developed if we are to be ethical or truly humane? What are the other three “seeds” which make up the “sensitive heart,” and how do they become developed? Why is the development of each a necessary part of humaneness?…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli And Hobbes Political Analysis
    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Machiavelli And Hobbes Political Analysis

    It is from this idea that Hobbes argues that the fear of death and bodily harm usher man to seek collective peace. The anarchy of the state of nature is consistent with the continual emotion of fear, fear that someone will steal your property or perhaps enslavement. To relieve this tension and enjoy life with less worry, Hobbes claims that people create a social contract between them and a ruler. According to him, people would essentially give up their power to one ruler who in turn, the ruler would ensure they could live peacefully. The only right left to the people, after they give all their power to a ruler and agree to abide by those laws, is the right to not be killed.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli Vs Hobbes Political Power Analysis
    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Machiavelli Vs Hobbes Political Power Analysis

    ‘For Hobbes, the purpose of politics is to escape war. As such, he insists that in order to establish a democratic political order, all individuals need to hand over their will to a single point of ultimate authority’ (Field, 2015). Due to their beliefs on human nature, Hobbes and Machiavelli shared comparable principles with regards to the need of a sovereign ruler, and the requirement for a functioning supreme power in order to control the people. In the enlightenment period in which Hobbes wrote in his book the Leviathan about the human nature of people, he, similarly to Machiavelli, described that they were selfish and war-prone. Hobbes believed that people are not born with the understanding of what was right…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Hobbes And John Locke's Political Debate
    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes And John Locke's Political Debate

    If this was truly an adequate representation of human nature and state of nature, mankind would know how to mitigate issues on an individual position without the interference of a government. Some may object by saying that there are anomalies in every community that deviate from the consensus. However, human nature implies that said characteristics are universal in all humans, there are no exceptions. If the basis of Locke’s interpretations were as plausible as Hobbes, every exception would be a result of human nature, not vice versa. Thus, a government is compulsory because the state of nature is a state of war of every man against every man, human nature is egotistical and power-driven, and the government should be in the form of an absolute monarchy because it instills strict and effective law and…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes And Locke Similarities
    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hobbes And Locke Similarities

    Hobbes and Locke’s methods of discerning the cause of man’s desire to join a commonwealth are very similar, yet they both have dissimilar views on what the state of nature should be like and what the legitimate power would look like, but Locke’s creation of executive prerogative complicates his negative views of Hobbes’s sovereign. Though Locke disagrees often with the works of Hobbes, he does share similar qualities of both his view of legitimate political power and what the state of nature is like. In both Hobbes and Locke’s view, the legitimate authority of government comes from receiving the consent of those that want to join the commonwealth while still in the state of nature. In the state of nature, Hobbes and Locke both agree on the idea that man is an individualist, looking out only for himself.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Argument Or False Assumption Of Human Nature?
    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hobbes Argument Or False Assumption Of Human Nature?

    Do you have an unquenchable and selfish desire for power? According to Thomas Hobbes take on human nature, you do. This view will be examined by asking; Does Hobbes’s account of why life would be so bad in the ‘state of nature’ rest on a false assumption about human nature? Who is Thomas Hobbes will be the first premise for investigation then The ‘state of nature’ as defined by Hobbes will be described then assessed.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    State Of Nature: Thomas Hobbes And John Locke
    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    State Of Nature: Thomas Hobbes And John Locke

    Hobbes for instance, believing that the state of nature is enviably a state of war explains that society needs a strong government to maintain order, ensuring that people do not lapse into war. This is why he argues for an absolute monarch. Hobbes view is that everyone is born with rights that they relinquish to the monarch in return for safety and protection. This is called the social contract. When people do this, they are essentially giving up their freedom and liberty, surrendering all control to the monarch.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Compare And Contrast John Locke And Thomas Hobbes
    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Compare And Contrast John Locke And Thomas Hobbes

    Introduction ‘During and after the English Revolution (1642-88), different English thinkers reacted differently toward the revolution, based on their own life experience and philosophical outlook’. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke strongly argued distinct notions of political power. One absolute kinship, the other a democratic republic. In this essay it will firstly state and discuss the relation between state and sovereign according to Thomas Hobbes. In doing so Thomas Hobbes ideas will then be compared to John Locke’s.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Strengths And Weaknesses Of Hobbes Theory Of Civil Order
    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Strengths And Weaknesses Of Hobbes Theory Of Civil Order

    PS4217F Major Political Thinkers: Hobbes Assignment 1: What are the main strengths and weaknesses of Hobbes’ theory of civil order? Name: Denise Cher Yan Wen Matriculation Number: A0127001A Word Count: 1887 Introduction Hobbes’ theory of civil order is based on the fundamental law of nature, which is to seek peace (Hobbes 2012, 200). According to Hobbes, to seek peace is necessarily to seek peace in the condition of war, and justice is therefore a legal compliance with the terms of the social contract (Hobbes 2012, 220).…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Comparing Hobbes And Aristotle's Views Of Human Nature
    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Comparing Hobbes And Aristotle's Views Of Human Nature

    Aristotle states that the polis allows for man to have the best life, and thus they naturally choose to live in it through the usage of reason. Similarly, Hobbes holds that the natural law is what leads us to forming a polis. The natural law states that man should do anything possible to extend his own life, this means creating peace. To Hobbes the only way to create peace is through having a sovereign, which in the process has individuals give up all their rights to the sovereign, except there right to protection of one’s own self. The sovereign therefore allows for peace which makes it the best possible place for individuals to live.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Vs Rousseau Analysis
    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hobbes Vs Rousseau Analysis

    Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau strongly differ on their view of the purpose of the state. Hobbes sees the state as a positive institution that creates order and sows peace. Rousseau sees the state as an institution of chains, that renders it’s citizens salves to the will of the majority. Before reaching these conclusions they argue on the base nature of man. Hobbes argues that self preservation is the base of human nature whereas Rousseau argues it is property.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes And Locke's View On Human Nature
    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hobbes And Locke's View On Human Nature

    Hobbes, on the other hand, thinks that people only care about power and appetite. We want certain things and we want to get power to get those things. Hobbes’ view is that there is no such thing as responsibility. Moreover, we look at the state of nature. Locke stated that the state of nature is the state of no government; law that obliges everyone and reason.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Hobbes And The Leviathan
    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes And The Leviathan

    Hobbes has been coined for planting the first seed of liberalism, but even though he has been credited for it, it is important to notice the aspects of conservatism found in his philosophy. There are four functions that all ideologies follow, including Hobbes’ Leviathan. The first function is the explanation for a political phenomenon. Since it is known that Hobbes wrote at the time of the English Civil War, it was no surprise that he was trying to explain the reason for the war. Hobbes believed, “that in the nature of man, we find three principal causes of quarrel.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Compare And Contrast Hobbes Locke And Rousseau
    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Hobbes Locke And Rousseau

    Hobbes wants the society to work together meaning giving some rights up in exchange for protection. “This equality of ability produces equality of hope for the attaining of our goals” (Thomas Hobbes). For example, if two people want something they both can’t enjoy or use then they quickly become enemies. Hobbes view, “A law of nature is a command or general rule, discovered by reason, which forbids a man to do anything that is destructive of his life or takes away his means for preserving his life, and forbids him to omit anything by which he thinks his life can best be preserved” (Leviathan, Chapter 14). Those who debate this subject often mistake right and law to be the same yet they ought to be distinguished.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes And Rousseau: A Comparative Analysis
    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hobbes And Rousseau: A Comparative Analysis

    Hobbes reduces the state of nature to a list of laws based on the individual’s desire to seek peace, which would conflict with the scenario Hobbes presents. However, one could view the state of nature as an example of collective rationality prescribing individual rationality. In the end, peace may be the goal, but it can only be achieved if others are united in seeking this goal.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings